Literature DB >> 30771712

Iterative fully convolutional neural networks for automatic vertebra segmentation and identification.

Nikolas Lessmann1, Bram van Ginneken2, Pim A de Jong3, Ivana Išgum4.   

Abstract

Precise segmentation and anatomical identification of the vertebrae provides the basis for automatic analysis of the spine, such as detection of vertebral compression fractures or other abnormalities. Most dedicated spine CT and MR scans as well as scans of the chest, abdomen or neck cover only part of the spine. Segmentation and identification should therefore not rely on the visibility of certain vertebrae or a certain number of vertebrae. We propose an iterative instance segmentation approach that uses a fully convolutional neural network to segment and label vertebrae one after the other, independently of the number of visible vertebrae. This instance-by-instance segmentation is enabled by combining the network with a memory component that retains information about already segmented vertebrae. The network iteratively analyzes image patches, using information from both image and memory to search for the next vertebra. To efficiently traverse the image, we include the prior knowledge that the vertebrae are always located next to each other, which is used to follow the vertebral column. The network concurrently performs multiple tasks, which are segmentation of a vertebra, regression of its anatomical label and prediction whether the vertebra is completely visible in the image, which allows to exclude incompletely visible vertebrae from further analyses. The predicted anatomical labels of the individual vertebrae are additionally refined with a maximum likelihood approach, choosing the overall most likely labeling if all detected vertebrae are taken into account. This method was evaluated with five diverse datasets, including multiple modalities (CT and MR), various fields of view and coverages of different sections of the spine, and a particularly challenging set of low-dose chest CT scans. For vertebra segmentation, the average Dice score was 94.9 ± 2.1% with an average absolute symmetric surface distance of 0.2 ± 10.1mm. The anatomical identification had an accuracy of 93%, corresponding to a single case with mislabeled vertebrae. Vertebrae were classified as completely or incompletely visible with an accuracy of 97%. The proposed iterative segmentation method compares favorably with state-of-the-art methods and is fast, flexible and generalizable.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Deep learning; Iterative instance segmentation; Vertebra identification; Vertebra segmentation

Year:  2019        PMID: 30771712     DOI: 10.1016/j.media.2019.02.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Image Anal        ISSN: 1361-8415            Impact factor:   8.545


  39 in total

1.  Artificial Intelligence in Neuroradiology: Current Status and Future Directions.

Authors:  Y W Lui; P D Chang; G Zaharchuk; D P Barboriak; A E Flanders; M Wintermark; C P Hess; C G Filippi
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2020-07-30       Impact factor: 3.825

2.  A Region-Based Deep Level Set Formulation for Vertebral Bone Segmentation of Osteoporotic Fractures.

Authors:  Faisal Rehman; Syed Irtiza Ali Shah; M Naveed Riaz; S Omer Gilani; Faiza R
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2020-02       Impact factor: 4.056

3.  Automatic annotation of cervical vertebrae in videofluoroscopy images via deep learning.

Authors:  Zhenwei Zhang; Shitong Mao; James Coyle; Ervin Sejdić
Journal:  Med Image Anal       Date:  2021-08-25       Impact factor: 8.545

Review 4.  Current development and prospects of deep learning in spine image analysis: a literature review.

Authors:  Biao Qu; Jianpeng Cao; Chen Qian; Jinyu Wu; Jianzhong Lin; Liansheng Wang; Lin Ou-Yang; Yongfa Chen; Liyue Yan; Qing Hong; Gaofeng Zheng; Xiaobo Qu
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2022-06

Review 5.  A Review of CT-Based Fracture Risk Assessment with Finite Element Modeling and Machine Learning.

Authors:  Ingmar Fleps; Elise F Morgan
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2022-09-01       Impact factor: 5.163

Review 6.  A review on the application of deep learning for CT reconstruction, bone segmentation and surgical planning in oral and maxillofacial surgery.

Authors:  Jordi Minnema; Anne Ernst; Maureen van Eijnatten; Ruben Pauwels; Tymour Forouzanfar; Kees Joost Batenburg; Jan Wolff
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2022-05-23       Impact factor: 3.525

7.  Automatic detection and voxel-wise mapping of lumbar spine Modic changes with deep learning.

Authors:  Kenneth T Gao; Radhika Tibrewala; Madeline Hess; Upasana U Bharadwaj; Gaurav Inamdar; Thomas M Link; Cynthia T Chin; Valentina Pedoia; Sharmila Majumdar
Journal:  JOR Spine       Date:  2022-06-08

Review 8.  Current and Future Applications of the Kambin's Triangle in Lumbar Spine Surgery.

Authors:  Romaric Waguia; Nithin Gupta; Katherine L Gamel; Alvan Ukachukwu
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2022-06-06

Review 9.  Artificial intelligence in spine care: current applications and future utility.

Authors:  Alexander L Hornung; Christopher M Hornung; G Michael Mallow; J Nicolás Barajas; Augustus Rush; Arash J Sayari; Fabio Galbusera; Hans-Joachim Wilke; Matthew Colman; Frank M Phillips; Howard S An; Dino Samartzis
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2022-03-27       Impact factor: 2.721

Review 10.  AI musculoskeletal clinical applications: how can AI increase my day-to-day efficiency?

Authors:  YiRang Shin; Sungjun Kim; Young Han Lee
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2021-08-03       Impact factor: 2.199

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.