| Literature DB >> 35062908 |
Wei Chen1,2, Boer Shan1,3, Shuling Zhou3,4, Huijuan Yang5,6, Shuang Ye7,8.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: This study aims to evaluate the role of the fibrinogen/albumin ratio (FAR) in predicting platinum resistance and survival outcomes of patients with ovarian clear cell carcinoma (OCCC).Entities:
Keywords: Clear cell carcinoma; Fibrinogen/albumin ratio; Ovarian neoplasms; Platinum resistance; Survival
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35062908 PMCID: PMC8780809 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-022-09204-0
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Cancer ISSN: 1471-2407 Impact factor: 4.430
Fig. 1Flow chart illustrating the patient inclusion
Patient characteristics in relation to preoperative blood parameters
| Characteristic | Na (%) | CA125b (U/ml) | HE4 b | ALBb | FIB b (g/l) | FAR b (%) | DDI b |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (pmol/L) | (mg/l) | ||||||
| All cases | 114 | 186.1 (6.5–5000*) | 106.2 (37.0–1500*) | 41.1 (25.9–52.1) | 4.58 (1.94–8.94) | 10.7 (4.8–25.1) | 1.5 (0.1–55.2) |
| Age (year) | |||||||
| < 40 | 12 (10.5) | 254.7 (66.2–912.8) | 111.1 (35.5–209.6) | 42.2 (33.7–49.2) | 4.85 (2.69–6.59) | 11.4 (6.5–16.3) | 2.1 (0.7–10.7) |
| 40 ~ 59 | 75 (65.8) | 131.0 (6.5–2854.0) | 106.2 (37.0–1500*) | 41.5 (28.1–52.1) | 4.34 (1.94–8.94) | 10.2 (4.9–25.1) | 1.4 (0.1–55.2) |
| ≥60 | 27 (23.7) | 239.1 (13.29–5000*) | 124.3 (55.5–1500*) | 40.3 (25.9–46.5) | 4.38 (2.42–8.79) | 12.1 (6.2–23.3) | 2.3 (0.2–30.6) |
| | 0.081 | 0.228 | 0.377 | 0.778 | 0.074 | 0.451 | |
| FIGO stage | |||||||
| I | 53 (46.5) | 66.2 (6.5–5000*) | 106.2 (37.0–1500*) | 42.1 (28.1–52.1) | 3.90 (1.94–7.15) | 8.9 (4.9–21.6) | 0.7 (0.1–42.6) |
| II | 13 (11.4) | 133.5 (22.2–1401.0) | 106.2 (47.0–252.4) | 43.7 (31.5–47.8) | 4.04 (2.30–7.92) | 9.1 (5.2–25.1) | 1.3 (0.3–55.2) |
| III | 35 (30.7) | 283.8 (46.1–2854.0) | 106.2 (47.4–1500*) | 40.3 (30.8–46.5) | 4.83 (2.20–8.94) | 12.0 (5.4–23.3) | 3.2 (0.5–11.0) |
| IV | 13 (11.4) | 304.8 (48.9–5000*) | 106.2 (44.1–331.9) | 39.2 (25.9–49.2) | 4.75 (3.42–7.95) | 15.1 (8.8–11.5) | 3.9 (0.6–9.2) |
| | 0.837 | 0.180 | |||||
| Residual tumour | |||||||
| 0 | 89 (78.1) | 126.0 (6.5–5000*) | 106.2 (37.0–1500*) | 41.7 (28.1–52.1) | 4.13 (1.94–8.94) | 9.9 (4.9–25.1) | 1.2 (0.1–55.2) |
| ≤1 cm | 16 (14.0) | 551.9 (46.1–1845.3) | 112.7 (68.9–904.0) | 39.0 (29.0–45.4) | 4.98 (3.25–8.79) | 12.9 (7.3–15.9) | 3.9 (0.7–9.3) |
| > 1 cm | 9 (7.9) | 475.1 (151.6–1866.0) | 209.6 (47.4–1500*) | 39.2 (25.9–49.2) | 5.46 (3.42–7.95) | 15.3 (8.9–20.3) | 5.0 (0.8–11.0) |
| | 0.238 | 0.056 | |||||
| Endometriosis | |||||||
| Present | 33 (28.9) | 121.0 (22.2–5000*) | 99.5 (44.1–1500*) | 41.6 (35.7–52.1) | 3.83 (2.20–7.15) | 8.4 (5.0–20.0) | 1.3 (0.2–42.6) |
| Absent | 81 (70.1) | 195.0 (6.5–5000) | 106.2 (37.0–1500*) | 40.7 (25.9–49.9) | 4.72 (1.94–8.94) | 11.5 (5.0–25.0) | 2.1 (0.1–55.2) |
| | 0.314 | 0.111 | 0.090 | 0.593 | |||
| Platinum response | |||||||
| Sensitive | 85 (74.6) | 105.5 (6.5–5000*) | 106.2 (37.0–1500*) | 41.7 (28.1–52.1) | 4.00 (1.94–8.94) | 9.2 (4.9–25.1) | 1.0 (0.1–30.6) |
| resistant | 29 (25.4) | 378.2 (69.93–1866.0) | 134.3 (47.0–1500*) | 39.2 (25.9–49.2) | 4.99 (2.71–8.79) | 13.3 (6.2–23.3) | 5.0 (0.6–55.2) |
| | |||||||
Abbreviations: ALB albumin, FIB fibrinogen, FAR fibrinogen/ albumin ratio, DDI d-dimer
a Categorical data are shown in absolute value and proportion
b Continuous variables are represented by median and range
* The upper limit of CA125 detection is 5000. The upper limit of HE4 detection is 1500
P values with statistical significance were denoted
Fig. 2Differential expression of fibrinogen/albumin ratio in patients with different FIGO stages, platinum response, and residual tumour. (Abbreviations: S, platinum-sensitive; R, platinum resistance)
Fig. 3Receiver operating characteristic curve demonstrating the AUC of preoperative FAR for platinum resistance, PFS and OS. (Abbreviations: AUC, area under the curve; FAR, fibrinogen/albumin ratio; OS, overall survival; PFS, progression-free survival)
Univariate and multivariate analysis regarding platinum response. (N = 114)
| Variables | Univariate analysis | Multivariate analysis | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HR | 95% CI | HR | 95% CI | |||
| stage | 2.526 | 1.503–4.248 | 0.114 | |||
| Endometriosis | 0.365 | |||||
| CA125 | 0.703 | |||||
| HE4 | 0.700 | |||||
| ALB | 0.903 | 0.814–1.002 | 0.567 | |||
| FIB | 1.516 | 1.079–2.130 | 0.661 | |||
| FAR(%) | ||||||
| < 12 | 1 | 1 | ||||
| ≥12 | 5.012 | 1.737–14.464 | 4.963 | 1.845–13.354 | ||
| DDI | 1.116 | 1.103–1.23 | 1.101 | 1.001–1.210 | ||
Abbreviations: ALB albumin, FIB fibrinogen, FAR fibrinogen/ albumin ratio, DDI d-dimer, HR hazard ratio, CI confidence interval
P values with statistical significance were denoted
Multivariate analysis regarding residual tumour of advanced patients. (N = 48)
| Variables | Multivariate analysis | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| HR | 95% CI | ||
| stage | 0.501 | ||
| Endometriosis | 0.124 | ||
| CA125 | 0.765 | ||
| FIB | 0.250 | ||
| FAR (%) | |||
| < 12 | |||
| ≥12 | 5.057 | 1.903–13.440 | |
| DDI | 0.707 | ||
Abbreviations: FIB fibrinogen, FAR fibrinogen/ albumin ratio, DDI d-dimer, HR hazard ratio, CI confidence interval
P values with statistical significance were denoted
Multivariate cox proportional analysis regarding overall survival and progression free survival
| Variables | PFS | OS | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HR | 95% CI | HR | 95% CI | |||
| FIB | 0.902 | 0.922 | ||||
| DDI | 1.045 | 1.013–1.078 | 1.044 | 1.001–1.089 | ||
| CA125 | 0.281 | 0.143 | ||||
| ALB | 0.652 | 0.593 | ||||
| HE4 | 0.667 | 0.587 | ||||
| Endometriosis | 0.629 | 0.947 | ||||
| stage | ||||||
| I | 1 | 1 | ||||
| II | 3.817 | 1.526–9.551 | 0.951 | |||
| III | 7.760 | 3.313–18.173 | 8.586 | 3.234–22.796 | ||
| IV | 3.590 | 1.251–10.308 | 3.596 | 1.123–11.510 | ||
| Residual tumour | ||||||
| 0 | 1 | |||||
| <= 1 cm | 0.410 | 0.669 | ||||
| > 1 cm | 5.556 | 2.079–14.843 | 2.484 | 1.020–6.050 | ||
| FAR | ||||||
| < 12% | 1 | |||||
| > = 12% | 2.228 | 1.217–4.081 | 3.606 | 1.759–7.390 | ||
Abbreviations: ALB albumin, FIB fibrinogen, FAR fibrinogen/ albumin ratio, DDI d-dimer, HR hazard ratio, CI confidence interval
P values with statistical significance were denoted
Fig. 4Kaplan-Meier curves of PFS and OS for all patients stratified into two groups: patients with a FAR ≥12% and patients with a FAR < 12%
Fig. 5Kaplan–Meier curves of PFS and OS for (A) patients without residual tumour, (B) patients with advanced-stage and (C) advanced patients without residual tumour stratified into two groups: patients with a FAR ≥12% and patients with a FAR < 12%