Literature DB >> 32760583

A retrospective analysis of emergency surgery for cases of acute abdomen during cancer chemotherapy. Case series.

Yoshiaki Maeda1, Toshiki Shinohara1, Nozomi Minagawa1, Tadayuki Kobayashi1, Ryota Koyama1, Shingo Shimada1, Yusuke Tsunetoshi1, Keisuke Murayama1, Haruka Hasegawa1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Treatment for acute abdomen during chemotherapy is frequently difficult because of the complicated status of the patients, and there have been only a few case series summarizing the outcomes of emergent surgery during chemotherapy. The aim of this study was to clarify the clinical outcomes of emergency surgery for acute abdomen during chemotherapy and identify predictive factors associated with mortality.
METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed the records of patients who underwent emergency surgery for acute abdomen within 30-days after anti-cancer drugs administration between 2009 and 2020.
RESULTS: Thirty patients were identified. The primary malignancies were hematological (n = 7), colorectal (n = 4), lung (n = 4), stomach (n = 2), breast (n = 2), prostate (n = 2) and others (n = 5). Fifteen patients were treated with the regimen, including molecular-targeted anti-cancer drugs (Bevacizumab: 8 cases, Rituximab: 4, Ramucirumab: 2, and Gefitinib: 1). Indications for emergency surgery were perforation of the gastrointestinal tract (n = 24), appendicitis (n = 3), bowel obstruction (n = 2), and gallbladder perforation (n = 1). Severe morbidity (Clavien-Dindo IIIa or more) occurred in 8 cases (27%), and there were 6 in-hospital deaths (20%). Significant factors related to in-hospital death were age >70 years old (P = 0.029), poor performance status (ECOG score 1 or 2) (P = 0.0088), and serum albumin level <2.6 g/dl (P = 0.026). The incidence of acute abdomen (odds ratio 5.31, P = 0.00017) was significantly higher in the patients receiving anti-VEGF drugs than in those without anti-VEGF drugs.
CONCLUSION: This study identified three predictive factors associated with in-hospital death after emergency surgery during chemotherapy: an older age, poor performance status, and low serum albumin level.
© 2020 The Authors.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Acute abdomen; Anti-VEGF; Cancer chemotherapy; Chemotherapy; Emergency surgery

Year:  2020        PMID: 32760583      PMCID: PMC7393459          DOI: 10.1016/j.amsu.2020.07.038

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Med Surg (Lond)        ISSN: 2049-0801


Introduction

Recently, advances in chemotherapy, including molecular-targeted anti-cancer drugs, have greatly improved the prognosis and quality of life of patients with unresectable or recurrent cancer. With the development of more strong regimens including the combination of multiple anti-cancer drugs, the rates of severe adverse effects have been increasing, so treatment for complications related to chemotherapy is becoming important. Acute abdomen, such as perforation of the gastrointestinal (GI) tract, is one of the most severe adverse events during chemotherapy. Treatment for acute abdomen during chemotherapy is frequently difficult because of the complicated status of the patients, such as the presence of severe neutropenia. The present study clarified the clinical outcomes of emergency surgery for acute abdomen during cancer chemotherapy and identified predictive factors associated with surgical mortality. The incidence of acute abdomen during cancer chemotherapy was also estimated.

Patients and methods

We retrospectively analyzed the records of emergency surgery at our hospital between January 2009 and January 2020 using the database of gastrointestinal surgery division. Patients who underwent emergency surgery for acute abdomen within 30 days after anti-cancer drugs administration were included in the study. Background clinical factors, surgical procedures, and short-term outcomes were analyzed. Potential predicting factors associated with in-hospital death were evaluated. The number of chemotherapies administered during this period was counted using the database of the hospital's chemotherapy ordering system. This study was approved by the ethics committee of the institute, and informed consent was obtained from the all presented patients. This work has been reported in line with the PROCESS criteria [1]. To investigate prognostic factors, a chi-square test was used to analyze the nominal variables. Statistical analyses were performed using the EZR statistical software program [2]. A value of P < 0.05 was considered to be statistically significant.

Results

Outcomes of emergent surgery during chemotherapy

Emergency surgery was performed for 420 cases in the gastrointestinal surgery division between January 2009 and January 2020. Thirty patients who had been receiving cancer chemotherapy within 30 days were included in this study. Twenty-seven patients had been receiving cancer chemotherapy associated with intra-venous anti-cancer drugs, and three had been treated by per-oral anti-cancer drugs. The number of chemotherapies performed in the relevant period was 103249, and these data were used to calculate the incidence of acute abdomen per treatment (Fig. 1).
Fig. 1

Overview of the patients included in the study.

Overview of the patients included in the study. The clinical characteristics of the patients are shown in Table 1. The group consisted of 15 women and 15 men, and the mean age was 64 years old (34–84). Primary malignancies were hematological (n = 7), colorectal (n = 4), lung (n = 4), stomach (n = 2), breast (n = 2), prostate (n = 2) and others (bladder, testis, uterus, pancreas, and soft tissue). Thirteen patients received multi-drug regimens consisting of ≥3 anti-cancer drugs, and 15 were treated with regimens including molecular-targeted anti-cancer drugs (Bevacizumab: 8 cases, Rituximab: 4, Ramucirumab: 2, and Gefitinib: 1).
Table 1

Demographics and clinical characteristics of the patients.

Agea64 (34–84)Chemotherapy regimenc
Gender (F/M)15/15CBDCA + PEM + BEV2
Primary cancerFOLFOX + BEV2
 Hematological7TC + BEV2
 Colorectal4FOLFIRI + RAM2
 Lung4GEM + CDDP2
 Ovary4CHOP2
 Stomach2TC2
 Breast2DTX2
 Prostate2CDGP + BEV1
 Othersb5PEM + BEV1
ChemotherapyRIT + ESHAC1
 Intravenous/per oral27/3RIT + TEMO1
 Anti-VEGF drugs (used/not used)10/17ADM + VCR1
ECOG performance score (0/1/2/3)20/8/2/0IFO + ADM1
ASA classification (1E/2E/3E)15/13/2GEM + L-OHP1
BMIa19.8 (16.8–37.2)FEC1
Time since cancer diagnosis (<3 months/3–12 months/1year <)12/6/12FOLFOX1
DCS1
PTX1
Time since latest chemotherapy (<3 days/4–10 days/11 days <)8/13/9Fulvestrant + Abemaciclib1
Gefitinib1
Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone1

Mean + range.

Bladder, testis, uterus, pancreas, and soft tissue.

ADM Doxorubicin, BEV Bevacizumab, CBDCA Carboplatin, CDDP Cisplatin, CDGP Nedaplatin, CHOP CPA + ADM + VCR, CPA Cyclophosphamide, DCS Docetaxel + Cisplatin + S1, DTX Docetaxel, ESHAP Etoposide + Solumedrol + high-dose AraC + Cisplatin, FEC Fluouraci + Epirubicin Hydrochloride + Cyclophosphamide, GEM Gemcitabine Hydrochloride, IFO Ifosfamide, L-OHP Oxaliplatin, PEM Pemetrexed Sodium Hydrate, RAM Ramcizumab, RIT Rituximab, TC Paclitaxel + Carboplatin, TEMO Temozolomide, VCR Vincristine.

Demographics and clinical characteristics of the patients. Mean + range. Bladder, testis, uterus, pancreas, and soft tissue. ADM Doxorubicin, BEV Bevacizumab, CBDCA Carboplatin, CDDP Cisplatin, CDGP Nedaplatin, CHOP CPA + ADM + VCR, CPA Cyclophosphamide, DCS Docetaxel + Cisplatin + S1, DTX Docetaxel, ESHAP Etoposide + Solumedrol + high-dose AraC + Cisplatin, FEC Fluouraci + Epirubicin Hydrochloride + Cyclophosphamide, GEM Gemcitabine Hydrochloride, IFO Ifosfamide, L-OHP Oxaliplatin, PEM Pemetrexed Sodium Hydrate, RAM Ramcizumab, RIT Rituximab, TC Paclitaxel + Carboplatin, TEMO Temozolomide, VCR Vincristine. The profile of surgical procedures for acute abdomen and short-term results of the operation are shown in Table 2. Indications for emergency surgery were perforation of the GI tract (n = 24), appendicitis (n = 3), bowel obstruction (n = 2), and gallbladder perforation (n = 1). GI tract perforation occurred at the cancer site in 14 cases, and at other sites in 10 cases. The operative procedures performed were resection (n = 7), stoma (n = 5), omentum patch (n = 4), resection and stoma (n = 3), drainage only (n = 3), appendectomy (n = 3), patch and stoma (n = 2), bypass (n = 2), and cholecystectomy (n = 1). The median operative time was 85 min (range 55–165), and the median blood loss was 10 ml (range 0–2750). Severe morbidity (Clavien-Dindo ≥ IIIa) occurred in 8 cases (27%), and there were 6 in-hospital deaths (20%).
Table 2

Operative procedures performed for acute abdomen after chemotherapy.

Character of acute abdomen
 GI perforation24
 Appendicitis3
 Bowel obstruction2
 Gallbladder perforation1
Site of GI perforation
 Cancer site/Others14/10
Operative procedure
 Resection7
 Stoma5
 Omentum patch4
 Resection + stoma3
 Drainage only3
 Appendectomy3
 Omentum patch + stoma2
 Bypass2
 Cholecystectomy1
 Operative time (minutes)a85 (55–165)
 Blood loss (ml)a10 (0–2750)
 Hospital stay (days)a25 (10–155)
Morbidity
 Clavien-Dindo 0/I/II/III/IV/V9/2/9/6/2/2
Mortality
 30-day mortality2
 In hospital death6

Median + range.

Operative procedures performed for acute abdomen after chemotherapy. Median + range. The results of a univariate analysis for potential factors predicting in-hospital death among the cases of acute abdomen during chemotherapy are shown in Table 3. Significant factors related to in-hospital death were an age >70 years old (odds ratio 8.9, P = 0.029), poor performance status (PS; ECOG score 1 or 2) (odds ratio 16.7, P = 0.0088), and serum albumin level <2.6 g/dl (odds ratio 11.1, P = 0.026).
Table 3

Factors associated with in-hospital mortality after emergency surgery for acute abdomen after chemotherapy.

Alive
In-hospital death
Odds ratio95% CIP value
(n = 24)(n = 6 =
Age
 <69 years old2028.90.94–1320.029
 70 years old<44
 Gender
 Female114N.S.
 Male132
Primary cancer
 Hematological61N.S.
 Colorectal31
 Lung31
 Ovary22
 Others101
Chemotherapy
 Intravenous225N.S.
 Per oral drug only21
Chemotherapy
 Single drug31N.S.
 2 drugs112
 3 or more drugs103
Anti-VEGF drugs
 Used73N.S.
 Not used173
ECOG performance score
 ECOG 019116.71.14–9370.0088
 ECOG 1–255
ASA classification
 1E141N.S.
 2E or 3E105
Time since cancer diagnosis
 <3 months102N.S.
 3–12 months51
 12 months <93
Time since latest chemotherapy
 <3 days80N.S.
 4–10 days44
 11 days <72
Character of acute abdomen
 GI perforation186N.S.
 Others60
Morbidity
 Clavien-Dindo 0-II173N.S.
 Clavien-Dindo III <73
Albumin
 <2.6 g/dl7511.10.99–6040.026
 2.6 g/dl<171
Total protein
 <5.0 g/dl53N.S.
 5.0 g/dl<193
Hemoglobin
 <10 g/dl72N.S.
 10 g/dl<174
Cholinesterase
 <150 U/l115N.S.
 150 U/l<131
WBC
 <3000/mm383N.S.
 3000–10000/mm3102
 1000/mm30<61
Neutrophil
 <1500/mm350N.S.
 1500/mm3<163

N.S. No statistical significance.

Factors associated with in-hospital mortality after emergency surgery for acute abdomen after chemotherapy. N.S. No statistical significance.

Incidence of acute abdomen and GI perforation during chemotherapy

In the study period, 103249 chemotherapies, including intra-venous infusion, were performed, so the incidence of acute abdomen needing surgery was 0.026% (27/103249) per therapy session. Anti-VEGF drugs were used in 10311 chemotherapies (Bevacizumab: 8248, Ramucirumab: 1285, Panitumumab: 784, and Aflibercept Beta: 30). The incidence of both acute abdomen (odds ratio 5.31, P = 0.00017) and GI tract perforation (odds ratio 6.62, P = 0.00011) was significantly higher in the patients receiving anti-VEGF drugs than in those without anti-VEGF drugs (Table 4).
Table 4

Impact of the administration of anti-VEGF drugs for incidence of acute abdomen.

Emergent surgery for acute abdomen
(+)(-)IncidenceP valueOdds ratio
Anti-VEGF drugsUsed10103010.097%0.000175.31
Not used17929210.018%



Emergency surgery for GI perforation
(+)(-)IncidenceP valueOdds ratio
Anti-VEGF drugsUsed9103020.087%0.000116.62
Not used12929260.013%
Impact of the administration of anti-VEGF drugs for incidence of acute abdomen.

Discussion

An oncologic emergency is an acute condition of a cancer patient that develops directly or indirectly from cancer or cancer treatment. Acute abdomen is one of the most severe oncologic emergencies and includes GI perforation, GI obstruction, appendicitis, and others. Patients developing acute abdomen as a symptom of oncologic emergencies can typically only be rescued by surgical treatment; however, the surgical mortality rates after emergency surgery for oncological emergencies, such as perforated GI, have been reported to be very high, ranging from 11% to 42% [[3], [4], [5], [6]]. Some authors have reported predictive risk factors for mortality after surgery for oncologic emergency [[6], [7], [8], [9]]; however, the literature describing the outcome of emergency surgery for patients receiving cancer chemotherapy is extremely limited [10]. Since the time for decision-making is limited due to the emergency status of the patients, there is a need for objective parameters that assist in predicting the outcome of surgical intervention for acute abdomen during chemotherapy. In the present study, we identified three predictive factors associated with in-hospital death after emergency surgery during chemotherapy: an age >70 years old, poor PS (ECOG >0), and serum albumin level <2.6 g/dl. It is natural that an older age was identified as a negative factor related to in-hospital death, since an older age has been reported to be a poor prognostic factor associated with oncologic emergency in many reports [7,11]. A poor PS has also been reported to be a strong poor prognostic factor for not only the surgical outcome for oncologic emergency [6,8] but also the outcome of chemotherapy itself [[12], [13], [14]]. Most clinical trials of chemotherapy include patients with a good PS only [15]; however, in the real world, cancer patients with a poor PS often undergo chemotherapy. The present study clearly showed that a poor PS was a risk factor for mortality after emergency surgery during chemotherapy. A low serum albumin level has also been reported to be a poor prognostic indicator for the surgical outcome in patients associated with oncological emergency [8,9]. The serum albumin level has been identified as a significant prognostic factor for patients with various types of cancer [[16], [17], [18]]. This reflects the important role of serum albumin as a biomarker of the visceral protein and immunocompetence status, which is fundamental for the biological nutritional assessment [19]. In the present case series, in-hospital mortality rate of the patients who had all 3 of these risk factors was 75%. Considering the poor prognostic factors related to in-hospital death identified in this study, special care should be taken when administering chemotherapy to cancer patients who are elderly or have a poor PS or poor nutrition status. The present study also showed that the incidence of both acute abdomen and GI tract perforation was significantly higher in patients receiving chemotherapy with anti-VEGF drugs than in those not being treated with anti-VEGF drugs. Anti VEGF agents, such as bevacizumab, ramucirumab, panitumumab, and aflibercept beta, inhibit neovascularization in the tumor tissue and can delay tumor growth [20]. A stronger response has been shown by the combination of conventional chemotherapy and anti-VEGF agents in various types of cancer. Indeed, guidelines around the world recommend the combination of anti-VEGF agents and chemotherapy as an option for treatment of many cancers, including colorectal, lung, and ovarian cancer [21]. However, while a high efficacy of anti-VEGF agents has been reported, serious adverse effects have also been described, including arterial thrombosis, hemorrhaging, and GI perforation. Many clinical trials of anti-VEGF drugs have shown that patients receiving anti-VEGF drugs had higher rates of GI perforation than those without such treatment [[21], [22], [23], [24], [25]]. Several authors have further reported that the risk of emergency surgery due to anti-VEGF agent-related severe adverse effects in advanced cancer was estimated to be as high as 2.8% [23,[26], [27], [28], [29]]. Other authors reported that the fatality rate of patients with GI perforation treated with anti-VEGF drugs was as high as 20% [30]. There have been many case reports of acute abdomen including GI perforation in patients with various kinds of cancer associated with chemotherapy [[31], [32], [33], [34], [35], [36], [37]]; however, there have been only two reports summarizing surgery cases of acute abdomen during cancer chemotherapy [10,38]. To our knowledge, this is the first report to clarify the risk factors for mortality after emergency surgery for acute abdomen during cancer chemotherapy. Several limitations associated with the present study warrant mention. This was a retrospective analysis performed at a single hospital with a limited number of patients, including heterogenous patients with various cancer types and receiving various chemotherapy regimens. Since this was not a prospective study and was based on the database of the surgery branch, we might have missed cases not referred to surgeons who received best supported care only. The incidence of acute abdomen among patients treated by per-oral anti-cancer drugs only was also not clarified in this study. A prospective study including a larger patient number will be necessary to establish a guideline for the treatment of patients with acute abdomen related to chemotherapy.

Conclusion

This study identified three predictive factors associated with in-hospital death after emergency surgery during chemotherapy: an age >70 years old, poor PS (ECOG >0), and serum albumin level <2.6 g/dl. Furthermore, the incidence of GI tract perforation during chemotherapy was approximately six times higher in the patients receiving anti-VEGF drugs than in those without anti-VEGF drugs. Clinicians should take these risk factors into consideration when performing cancer chemotherapy.

Statement of ethics

The authors have no ethical conflicts to disclosure. This study was approved by ethical committee of the institute, and informed consent was obtained from the all presented patients.

Funding

This study was not supported by any grant or funding.

Ethical Approval

This study was approved by the ethical committee of the hospital (Approved No. 30-71)

Consent

Anonymity of the patients has been strictly protected in the present study.

Author contribution

Study conception and design: Maeda, Shinohara Acquisition of data: Maeda, Shinohara, Koyama, Kobayashi, Murayama, Hasegawa Operator of surgery: Maeda, Shinohara, Minagawa, Shimada Drafting of manuscript: Maeda, Shimada, Minagawa, Tsunetoshi.

Registration of Research Studies

Name of the registry: UMIN-CTR Unique Identifying number or registration ID: UMIN 000040315 Hyperlink to your specific registration (must be publicly accessible and will be checked): https://upload.umin.ac.jp/cgi-open-bin/ctr/ctr_view.cgi?recptno=R000045997

Guarantor

Yoshiaki Maeda

Provenance and peer review

Not commissioned, externally peer reviewed.

Declaration of competing interest

The authors have no financial interests or potential conflicts of interest.
  38 in total

Review 1.  Normalizing tumor vasculature with anti-angiogenic therapy: a new paradigm for combination therapy.

Authors:  R K Jain
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 53.440

2.  Clinician accuracy when estimating survival duration: the role of the patient's performance status and time-based prognostic categories.

Authors:  Debbie Selby; Anita Chakraborty; Tammy Lilien; Erica Stacey; Liying Zhang; Jeff Myers
Journal:  J Pain Symptom Manage       Date:  2011-05-12       Impact factor: 3.612

3.  Incorporation of bevacizumab in the primary treatment of ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Robert A Burger; Mark F Brady; Michael A Bookman; Gini F Fleming; Bradley J Monk; Helen Huang; Robert S Mannel; Howard D Homesley; Jeffrey Fowler; Benjamin E Greer; Matthew Boente; Michael J Birrer; Sharon X Liang
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2011-12-29       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  Surgery for perforated small bowel malignancy: a single institution's experience over 4 years.

Authors:  Ker-Kan Tan; Shieh-Ling Bang; Choon-Kiat Ho
Journal:  Surgeon       Date:  2011-02-01       Impact factor: 2.392

5.  The PROCESS 2018 statement: Updating Consensus Preferred Reporting Of CasE Series in Surgery (PROCESS) guidelines.

Authors:  Riaz A Agha; Mimi R Borrelli; Reem Farwana; Kiron Koshy; Alexander J Fowler; Dennis P Orgill
Journal:  Int J Surg       Date:  2018-10-22       Impact factor: 6.071

6.  Small Intestinal Metastasis from Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma Presenting with Perforated Peritonitis.

Authors:  Osamu Chino; Hiroyasu Makuuchi; Soji Ozawa; Hideo Shimada; Takayuki Nishi; Soichiro Yamamoto; Hirohito Miyako; Eisuke Ito; Yoshifumi Kise; Tadashi Hara; Akihito Kazuno; Hiroshi Kajiwara
Journal:  Tokai J Exp Clin Med       Date:  2015-06-20

7.  FOLFOXIRI plus bevacizumab versus FOLFIRI plus bevacizumab as first-line treatment of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: updated overall survival and molecular subgroup analyses of the open-label, phase 3 TRIBE study.

Authors:  Chiara Cremolini; Fotios Loupakis; Carlotta Antoniotti; Cristiana Lupi; Elisa Sensi; Sara Lonardi; Silvia Mezi; Gianluca Tomasello; Monica Ronzoni; Alberto Zaniboni; Giuseppe Tonini; Chiara Carlomagno; Giacomo Allegrini; Silvana Chiara; Mauro D'Amico; Cristina Granetto; Marina Cazzaniga; Luca Boni; Gabriella Fontanini; Alfredo Falcone
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2015-08-31       Impact factor: 41.316

8.  Bevacizumab plus irinotecan, fluorouracil, and leucovorin for metastatic colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Herbert Hurwitz; Louis Fehrenbacher; William Novotny; Thomas Cartwright; John Hainsworth; William Heim; Jordan Berlin; Ari Baron; Susan Griffing; Eric Holmgren; Napoleone Ferrara; Gwen Fyfe; Beth Rogers; Robert Ross; Fairooz Kabbinavar
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2004-06-03       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  Clinical validation of a prognostic tool in a population of outpatients treated for incurable cancer undergoing anticancer therapy: PRONOPALL study.

Authors:  H Bourgeois; F Grudé; P Solal-Céligny; O Dupuis; E Voog; G Ganem; F Denis; M Zinger; L Juhel-Voog; C Lafond; P Maillart; O Capitain; R Delva; P Soulié; S Abadie-Lacourtoisie; V Guérin-Meyer; M E Morin-Meschin; J M Commer; A Gangler; B d'Aillières; A Zannetti; E Bourbouloux; D Berton-Rigault; S Lebouvier-Sadot; M Kaassis; J Baudon; Y H Lam; A Bizieux; M Marcq; J Edeline; F Le Du; C Lefeuvre; P Deguiral; V Delecroix; E Blot; J Egreteau; M J Goudier; R Lamy; M Ferec; X Artignan; S Corbinais; H Morel; A C Hardy-Bessard; C Alleaume; E Naudeix; O Cojocarasu; J P Metges; C Riché; E Gamelin; D Déniel-Lagadec; F Marhuenda; P Ingrand; J Y Douillard
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2017-07-01       Impact factor: 32.976

Review 10.  Rectal perforation following paclitaxel and carboplatin chemotherapy for advanced ovarian cancer: a case report and review of the literature.

Authors:  Sujen Jayakody; Danette Bianca Wright; Corrina Chiong; Mona Liu; Clare Bouffler; Toufic El-Khoury
Journal:  J Med Case Rep       Date:  2018-08-16
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.