Literature DB >> 30767017

Recovery Room Cortisol Predicts Long-Term Glucocorticoid Need After Transsphenoidal Surgery for Pituitary Tumors.

Amro Qaddoura1, Tenzin N Shalung1, Michael P Meier2, Jeannette Goguen3, Rowan Jing1, Stanley Zhang1, Kalman Kovacs4, Michael D Cusimano1,2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Accurate assessment of the need for glucocorticoid therapy is essential after transsphenoidal surgery (TSS) for pituitary tumors. Agreement on the best test to use in the early postoperative setting is lacking.
OBJECTIVE: To examine recovery room (RR) cortisol as a predictor of long-term need for glucocorticoids.
METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of 149 patients who underwent TSS for pituitary tumors between January 2007 and December 2014. Pathological tumor diagnoses were confirmed. Endocrinologists assessed the need for glucocorticoid supplementation within 6 to 8 wk after TSS. We extracted data on preoperative, RR, and day 1 to 3 post-TSS morning serum cortisol (MSC). We reported areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) and diagnostic measures for different cortisol measures. We also conducted a logistic regression to identify the most predictive variables.
RESULTS: Eighteen patients required glucocorticoid supplementation at follow-up. RR cortisol was the most accurate measurement in the early postoperative period (AUC [95% confidence interval (CI)], .92 [.85-.99]; P < .001), followed by day 1, 2, and 3 post-TSS MSC, respectively. A threshold RR cortisol of 744.0 nmol/L (26.97 μg/dL) had 90.9% sensitivity and 73.7% specificity for detecting patients in the hypocortisolism group, while 757.5 nmol/L (27.46 μg/dL) had 100% and 70.0%, respectively. The logistic regression identified RR cortisol as the sole significant predictor (odds ratio [CI], .36[.18-.71] for every 100 nmol/L increase; P = .0033).
CONCLUSION: The RR cortisol is accurate in predicting long-term glucocorticoid supplementation and may be the best early postoperative measure. Future larger studies should validate these findings and derive optimal RR cortisol threshold values. © Congress of Neurological Surgeons 2018.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Glucocorticoid; Neurosurgery; Pituitary resection; Pituitary tumors; Transsphenoidal surgery

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30767017      PMCID: PMC6375723          DOI: 10.1093/neuros/nyy070

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurosurgery        ISSN: 0148-396X            Impact factor:   4.654


adrenocorticotropic hormone area under the curve confidence interval glucocorticoid hypothalamic–pituitary–adrenal interquartile ranges insulin tolerance test morning serum cortisol negative predictive value positive predictive value Rathke's cleft cysts recovery room receiver operating characteristic transsphenoidal surgery standard deviation Acquired anterior pituitary insufficiency is a complication of transsphenoidal surgery (TSS) for pituitary tumors.[1-7] Disruptions to the hypothalamic–pituitary–adrenal (HPA) axis can cause adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH) deficiency, potentially leading to fatigue, hypotension, and even death.[8] Postoperative glucocorticoid (GC) supplementation was historically given to all patients undergoing TSS. Although identifying patients with a deficiency is a higher priority, administering GC in high doses or with long-term use puts patients at risk of developing hyperglycemia, delayed wound healing, hypertension, and bone loss.[9-11] Hence, accurately assessing postoperative HPA axis function is essential in deciding which patients require GC supplementation. The insulin tolerance test (ITT) is considered the gold standard for assessing HPA axis integrity,[8,12-14] but is limited in the early postoperative period.[13,15] The physiological stress associated with hypoglycemia confers patients to several risks.[13,15] Additionally, the ITT is contraindicated in elderly patients and patients with epilepsy or cardiovascular disease.[13] Other assays, such as the cosyntropin ACTH stimulation test, are also inadequate in the early postoperative period.[16] Hence, these tests are usually delayed for 4 to 6 wk after TSS.[13,15,16] Several centers have thus measured early postoperative serum cortisol as a surrogate marker. Despite emerging evidence for this practice,[16-22] controversy remains as to which point in the postoperative period is most useful and the most accurate threshold cortisol value to predict the need for GC supplementation. There is currently no accepted, consistent timing or threshold for early post-TSS morning serum cortisol (MSC) to assess HPA axis function. Suggested day 1 or 2 thresholds range from >110 nmol/L (>4 μg/dL) to >414 nmol/L (>15 μg/dL).[16-20] Similar large variability exists for day 5 to 7 MSC thresholds.[16,21,22] Only one study by Marko et al. investigated the utility of recovery room (RR) cortisol immediately after TSS, and used a low-dose cortrosyn stimulation test 4 to 6 wk postoperatively as the gold standard.[23] They found that RR cortisol ≥414 nmol/L was predictive of normal HPA axis function (sensitivity 98%, positive predictive value [PPV] 99%, accuracy 97%), and that RR cortisol was more accurate than day 1 post-TSS MSC.[23] We studied RR cortisol as a predictor of long-term GC therapy, and compared it to other early post-TSS MSC measurements. Our investigation differs from that of Marko et al,[23] as we used a different standard and used additional variables to predict which patients require GC. We also conducted a logistic regression to model which variables best predict the need for long-term GC. Moreover, 99% of patients in that study had normal postoperative HPA function, compared to 87.9% of patients in our study, allowing us to better predict which patients require GC. We hypothesized that a blunted RR cortisol response to the stress of surgery was the best predictor of long-term need for GC replacement after TSS.

METHODS

This study was approved by the Research Ethics Board at our hospital. As this was a retrospective study, consent from individual patients was not required. We adhered to the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology Statement in reporting this study.[24]

Patient Population

We retrospectively reviewed consecutive patients between January 2007 and December 2014 that underwent endoscopic or microscopic TSS for pituitary adenomas or Rathke's cleft cysts (RCC) using previously described techniques.[25-27] Most patients had serum cortisol measured in the postanesthesia care unit or “recovery room” after surgery as a standard order. We excluded patients if they received preoperative or intraoperative GC therapy, patients with ACTH-secreting adenomas, patients who received exogenous estrogen or other steroids that can interfere with serum cortisol values, and patients who did not follow-up for postoperative assessments. The need for preoperative or intraoperative GC was based on a preoperative MSC < 220 nmol/L and at the discretion of the treating neurosurgery and endocrinology teams. Patients had daily 0800h postoperative MSC drawn in the early postoperative period. We initiated long-term GC therapy in patients with a postoperative day 1 to 3 0800h MSC lower than 100 nmol/L (3.62 μg/dL), daily cortisol replacement in asymptomatic patients with 100 to 250 nmol/L, stress dosing in patients with 250 to 350 nmol/L (9.06-12.70 μg/dL), and discharged asymptomatic patients with no GC replacement if cortisol levels exceeded 350 nmol/L. Endocrinologists reassessed patients by clinical evaluation and 0800h MSC within 6 to 8 wk of surgery. The decision to initiate or continue GC therapy was made at the discretion of the treating endocrinologist. Endocrinologists used the following as a guideline: patients without clinical features of cortisol deficiency (eg chronic fatigue, weight loss, nausea, and hypoglycemia) and with follow-up MSC over 350 nmol/L were considered to have no deficiency in the HPA axis. Patients with: (1) clinical features of cortisol deficiency and MSC between 350 and 500 nmol/L (12.70-18.12 μg/dL), or (2) MSC between 100 and 350 nmol/L (with or without symptoms) underwent an ITT (or 250 μg ACTH stimulation test if ITT was contraindicated). A threshold value of >500 nmol/L was considered normal for both tests. Patients with MSC under 100 nmol/L remained on long-term GC replacement. We considered patients to have hypocortisolism if they were initiated or remained on long-term GC therapy during follow-up. This approach represents a standard considering the entire clinical and biochemical picture, tailored to each individual patient's needs.

Data Extraction

Preoperative MSC, RR cortisol, and day 1 to 3 post-TSS MSC were obtained from a central database. We defined RR cortisol as serum cortisol measured within 4 h after leaving the operating room and at least 1 h after resection of the tumor. Serum cortisol level was assessed by ADVIA Centaur® (Siemens Health Care, Erlangen, Germany) competitive immunoassay using direct chemiluminescent technology. This assay is highly specific for cortisol, and has a sensitivity and assay range of 5.5 to 2069 nmol/L (.20-75 μg/dL). In addition, we extracted patient age, sex, surgery type, tumor pathology, average number of preoperative pituitary deficiencies, Knosp score,[28] if the tumor was a macroadenoma, if the tumor was recurrent, and postoperative complications. The tumors were investigated in detail by histology, immunohistochemistry and in many cases, by transmission electron microscopy. A pathological diagnosis was achieved based on these findings.

Statistical Analysis

Statistics were reported as mean and standard deviation (SD) or as frequencies. We reported medians and interquartile ranges (IQR) for variables that were not normally distributed.[29] We compared means between groups using an independent t-test, and medians with a Wilcoxon 2-sample test. We analyzed categorical variables using Fisher's exact test. We assessed the accuracy of serum cortisol to predict GC need using the area under the curve (AUC) of the corresponding receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. We used the ROC curves to derive threshold cortisol values, and calculated the corresponding sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio (LR+), negative likelihood ratio (LR–), PPV, and negative predictive value (NPV). We also conducted a logistic regression using demographic data, preoperative variables, and early postoperative serum measures using a stepwise selection method. Statistical significance was taken at the 2-tailed 5% level. Analyses were performed using SAS 9.4 (SAS Institute Inc, Cary, North Carolina), and ROC curves using SPSS 20 (SPSS Inc, IBM, Armonk, New York).

RESULTS

There were 362 patients throughout the study period. Patients were excluded as follows: 104 with ACTH-secreting adenoma or preoperative/intraoperative GC use, 33 with exogenous estrogen or other steroid use, 27 for lack of follow-up, 20 for lack of data on early postoperative measures, 17 for tumors other than adenomas or RCC, and 12 for inaccessible data. The remaining 149 patients were included in this study.

Total Sample Characteristics

Patient characteristics are presented in Table 1. The mean (SD) age was 52.2 (14.8) years, and 79 (53.0%) patients were male; 134 (89.9%) patients had endoscopic surgery; 24 (16.1%) patients had recurrent tumors (Table 1). The following number of patients had data for different serum cortisol measures: 128 preoperative, 101 RR, 142 day-1, 127 day-2, and 78 day-3.
TABLE 1.

Characteristics of Study Patients

VariableaTotalHypocortisolismNonhypocortisolism P value
Number of patients (%)14918 (12.1)131 (87.9)
Sex, n (%)
 Male79 (53.0)14 (77.8)65 (49.6).042
 Female70 (47.0)4 (22.2)66 (50.4).042
Age, yr52.2 (14.8)54.3 (12.4)51.9 (15.1).51
Tumor pathology, n (%)
 Nonfunctioning69 (46.3)9 (50.0)60 (45.8).80
 Somatotroph35 (23.5)2 (11.1)33 (25.2).24
 Lactotroph5 (3.4)05 (3.8)>.99
 Gonadotroph23 (15.4)3 (16.7)20 (15.3)>.99
 Oncocytoma9 (6.0)3 (16.7)6 (4.6).079
 Rathke's cyst8 (5.4)1 (5.6)7 (5.3)>.99
Macroadenoma, n (%)c97 (68.8)14 (82.4)83 (66.9).27
Knosp score, n (%)c
 028 (19.9)1 (5.9)27 (21.8).19
 134 (24.1)1 (5.9)33 (26.6).12
 234 (24.1)3 (17.6)31 (25).76
 336 (25.5)9 (52.9)27 (21.8).014
 49 (6.4)3 (17.6)6 (4.8).078
Preoperative deficiencies1.55 (1.51)2.17 (1.54)1.47 (1.49).065
Recurrent tumor, n (%)24 (16.1)3 (16.7)21 (16.0)>.99
Surgery type, n (%)
 Endoscopic134 (89.9)14 (77.8)120 (91.6).087
 Microscopic15 (10.1)4 (22.2)11 (8.4).087
Complications, n (%)
 CSF leak5 (3.4)3 (16.7)2 (1.5).013
 Pituitary apoplexy3 (2.0)3 (16.7)0.0015
 Hypogonadism5 (3.4)05 (3.8)>.99
 Diabetes insipidusb13 (8.7)2 (11.1)11 (8.4).66
 Requiring THS27 (18.1)7 (38.9)20 (15.3).023

CSF, cerebrospinal fluid; SD, standard deviation; THS, thyroid hormone supplementation.

aAll values are reported as frequency (%) or mean (SD).

bRepresents nontransient diabetes insipidus.

cDoes not include Rathke's cleft cysts as they are not applicable.

Characteristics of Study Patients CSF, cerebrospinal fluid; SD, standard deviation; THS, thyroid hormone supplementation. aAll values are reported as frequency (%) or mean (SD). bRepresents nontransient diabetes insipidus. cDoes not include Rathke's cleft cysts as they are not applicable.

Comparison Between Groups

Comparisons between groups are presented in Table 1. Hypocortisolism developed postoperatively in 18 (12.1%) patients. Of 131 patients in the nonhypocortisolism group, 34 had to undergo dynamic testing (they remained classified in that group). The hypocortisolism group had significantly more males (77.8% vs 49.6%; P = .042). Macroadenomas were more frequent in the hypocortisolism group, but this was not statistically significant (82.4% vs 66.9%; P = .27). The Knosp score was generally higher in the hypocortisolism group (Table 1). Of the complications, cerebrospinal fluid leak, pituitary apoplexy, and requiring thyroid hormone supplementation were significantly more frequent in the hypocortisolism group. The 48 patients who did not have RR serum cortisol values did not differ in clinical, operative, or tumor characteristics compared to the 101 patients who had RR cortisol values. This was also true for patients who had missing values for day 1, 2, and 3 post-TSS MSC. Six patients were initiated on GC in the hospital based on day 1 to 3 post-TSS MSC, with RR cortisol values significantly lower in these patients (mean ± SD in nmol/L, 435.8 ± 343.8 vs 886.7 ± 253.5; P < .001). The preoperative MSC values were normally distributed. They were not significantly different between groups (mean ± SD in nmol/L, 313.4 ± 126.9 vs 375.5 ± 149.0; P = .15). All early postoperative cortisol measures were not normally distributed. The hypocortisolism group had a significantly lower serum cortisol in the RR (median [IQR], 493.0 [419.9-693.9] vs 880.4 [734.7-1079.3]; P < .001), at day 1 post-TSS (259.1 [65.4-520.6] vs 770.9 [541.9-1198.0]; P < .001), day 2 (224.0 [59.0-400.6] vs 529.5 [385.4-656.9]; P < .001), and day 3 (256.0 [70.9-748.0] vs 493.0 [362.0-666.0]; P = .037). Figure 1 illustrates these results.
FIGURE 1.

Median serum cortisol comparison between the hypocortisolism and nonhypocortisolism groups at different time points before and after the surgery (length of time between time points is not equivalent). The error bars represent IQR, and not standard deviations or errors. *** denotes P < .001; * denotes P = .037.

Median serum cortisol comparison between the hypocortisolism and nonhypocortisolism groups at different time points before and after the surgery (length of time between time points is not equivalent). The error bars represent IQR, and not standard deviations or errors. *** denotes P < .001; * denotes P = .037.

Accuracy and Diagnostic Measures

We evaluated the accuracy for each of the cortisol measures to predict the need for GC therapy using the AUC–ROC (Table 2). Of the early postoperative cortisol measures, RR cortisol was most accurate (AUC [95% confidence interval (CI)], .92 [.85-.99]; P < .001; Figure 2), followed by day 1, 2, and 3 post-TSS MSC, respectively (Table 2). Preoperative MSC was not statistically significant (.61 [.45-.77]; P = .20).
TABLE 2.

Accuracy of Different Cortisol Measures

Cortisol measureSample sizeAUC95% CI P value
Preoperative128.61.45-.77.20
RR101.92.85-.99<.001
Day 1 AM142.84.72-.95<.001
Day 2 AM127.81.67-.95<.001
Day 3 AM78.70.46-.94.037
In patients with both RR and day 1 a.m. values
 RR95.92.84-1.00<.001
 Day 1 a.m.95.85.69-1.00<.001

AUC, area under the curve; CI, confidence interval.

FIGURE 2.

ROC curve for RR cortisol. Cortisol thresholds (nmol/L) are shown on three points on the curve. AUC, area under the curve; CI, confidence interval.

ROC curve for RR cortisol. Cortisol thresholds (nmol/L) are shown on three points on the curve. AUC, area under the curve; CI, confidence interval. Accuracy of Different Cortisol Measures AUC, area under the curve; CI, confidence interval. We reported the sensitivity, specificity, LR+, LR–, PPV, and NPV of different cortisol thresholds (Table 3). A RR threshold of 757.5 nmol/L (27.46 μg/dL) resulted in 100% sensitivity and 70.0% specificity. The RR cortisol and day 1 post-TSS MSC were the most useful cortisol measures. Ninety-five patients had both values available. In these patients, the AUC for RR cortisol was .92 (CI, .84-1.00; P < .001), while day 1 post-TSS MSC had an AUC of .85 (.69-1.00; P < .001; Table 2).
TABLE 3.

Diagnostic Measures for Different Cortisol Thresholds at Different Time Points

ThresholdSensitivitySpecificityLR+LR–PPVNPV
(nmol/L)[95% CI][95% CI][95% CI][95% CI][95% CI][95% CI]
RR
 700.081.8%82.2%4.6.2236.0%97.4%
[48.2-97.7][72.7-89.5][2.7-7.8][.06-.78][18.0-57.5][90.8-99.7]
 744.090.9%73.3%3.4.1229.4%98.5%
[58.7-99.8][63.0-82.1][2.3-5.0][.02-.81][15.1-47.5][92.0-100]
 757.5100%70.0%3.3.0029.0%100%
[71.5-100][59.4-79.2][2.4-4.6][.00-.00][15.4-45.9][94.3-100]
Day 1
 465.570.6%82.4%4.0.3635.3%95.4%
[44.0-89.7][74.6-88.6][2.5-6.5][.17-.75][19.8-53.5][89.5-98.5]
 469.076.5%81.6%4.2.2936.1%96.2%
[50.1-93.2][73.7-88.0][2.6-6.5][.12-.68][20.8-53.8][90.6-99.0]
 576.588.2%70.4%3.0.1728.9%97.8%
[63.6-98.5][61.6-78.2][2.2-4.1][.05-.62][17.1-43.1][92.2-99.7]
Day 2
 385.576.9%75.4%3.1.3126.3%96.6%
[46.2-95.0][66.5-83.0][2.0-4.9][.11-.83][13.4-43.1][90.5-99.3]
 416.584.6%69.3%2.8.2223.9%97.5%
[54.6-98.1][60.0-77.6][1.9-4.0][.06-.80][12.6-38.8][91.4-99.7]
 440.592.3%66.7%2.8.1224.0%98.7%
[64.0-99.8][57.2-75.2][2.0-3.8][.02-.76][13.1-38.2][93.0-100]
Day 3
 257.554.6%89.6%5.2.5146.2%92.3%
[23.4-83.3][79.7-95.7][2.2-12.6][.26-.97][19.2-74.9][83.0-97.5]
 273.563.6%88.1%5.3.4146.7%93.7%
[30.8-89.1][77.8-94.7][2.4-11.7][.19-.91][21.3-73.4][84.5-98.2]
 329.072.7%82.1%4.1.3340.0%94.8%
[39.0-94.0][70.8-90.4][2.2-7.6][.13-.88][19.1-64.0][85.6-98.9]

CI, confidence interval; LR+, positive likelihood ratio; LR–, negative likelihood ratio; NPV, negative predictive value; PPV, positive predictive value; RR, recovery room.

The likelihood ratios refer to patients in the hypocortisolism group. The PPV also refers to patients in the hypocortisolism group.

Diagnostic Measures for Different Cortisol Thresholds at Different Time Points CI, confidence interval; LR+, positive likelihood ratio; LR–, negative likelihood ratio; NPV, negative predictive value; PPV, positive predictive value; RR, recovery room. The likelihood ratios refer to patients in the hypocortisolism group. The PPV also refers to patients in the hypocortisolism group. The logistic regression model identified RR cortisol as the only significant predictor in the model. We found that the odds of not requiring long-term glucocorticoids were 2.8 times higher for every 100 nmol/L increase in the RR cortisol (odds ratio [CI], .36 [.18-.71]; P = .0033).

DISCUSSION

We retrospectively studied the use of RR cortisol in predicting the need for long-term GC after TSS for pituitary tumors. Of the early postoperative cortisol measurements, we found RR cortisol to be most accurate, followed by day 1, 2, and 3 post-TSS MSC, respectively. As well, we derived optimal cortisol thresholds for the different time-points. A threshold RR cortisol of 744.0 nmol/L (26.97 μg/dL) had 90.9% sensitivity and 73.7% specificity, while 757.5 nmol/L (27.46 μg/dL) had 100% sensitivity and 70.0% specificity. The multivariate logistic regression identified RR cortisol as the only significant predictor in the model.

Study Importance

Accurately evaluating HPA axis integrity after TSS is important. The half-life of ACTH is approximately 10 min, while the half-life of cortisol is approximately 66 min. Since we measured cortisol after at least 1 half-life but still within the period of operative stress, we could detect a blunted stress response in patients who required GC supplementation. Failing to treat patients with an ACTH deficiency can lead to several complications including fatigue, hypotension, and even death,[8] while high doses or long-term use of GC can cause hypertension, hyperglycemia, and impaired wound healing.[9-11] Identifying patients who are deficient is a higher priority, and some centers test patientscortisol levels for several days after surgery for this purpose.[16,21,22] The ITT is considered the gold standard for evaluating HPA axis integrity, but is limited in the early postoperative period.[13,15] Other tests are also inadequate in this setting.[15] Hence, many algorithms use early postoperative serum cortisol as a surrogate for HPA axis integrity.[16-23] However, the optimal time-point and threshold remain contested.

Previous Studies

McLaughlin et al[18] suggested that a day 1 or 2 post-TSS MSC of >110 nmol/L (>4 μg/dL) was predictive of normal HPA axis function. However, Marko et al[19] recommended that patients have at least a day 1 or 2 MSC of ≥414 nmol/L (≥15 μg/dL), while Little et al[20] recommended that day 2 MSC should be >276-331 nmol/L (>10-12 μg/dL). Other recommendations differ still, such as the suggestion from Watts et al[17] of normal HPA axis function if the day 2 to 3 post-TSS MSC was >248 nmol/L (>9 μg/dL), a requirement for GC supplementation for <83 nmol/L (<3 μg/dL), and dynamic testing for values between 83 and 248 nmol/L. Notably, the discrepancies between these studies are further compounded by the lack of a consistent gold standard. For example, Marko et al[19] used definitive HPA axis function testing at 1 to 3 mo postoperatively as their gold standard, whereas Watts et al[17] used the ITT 5 to 7 d postoperatively, and Little et al[20] relied on whether patients were dependent on GC 1 yr after surgery. Furthermore, the lack of a consistent standard between studies makes it difficult to compare results across them. Our standard considers the entire clinical and biochemical picture, tailored to each individual patient's needs supplemented with appropriate biochemical testing in select patients. To our knowledge, the study by Marko et al[23] is the only published article that used the RR cortisol as a predictor of HPA axis function. One recent study by Asuzu et al[30] investigated the utility of early postoperative serum cortisol values for predicting nonremission of Cushing's disease after TSS. The study used these measures to help identify patients with residual adenoma leading to remnant hypercortisolemia.[30] Contrastingly, our study aimed to predict which patients would develop a deficiency, and excluded patients with Cushing's disease. Marko et al[23] found RR cortisol to be more accurate than the day 1 post-TSS MSC. Our present study found consistent results, as the RR cortisol was more accurate than MSC values on days 1, 2, or 3 following TSS. The hypocortisolism group contained more macroadenomas, more invasive tumors in general, and had a higher complication ratio. This could signify increased surgical trauma in the hypocortisolism group, possibly increasing the likelihood of developing hypocortisolism, but it is difficult to draw definitive conclusions about this with our current data. Earlier studies demonstrated increased serum cortisol in response to surgical and anesthetic stresses, and formed the background foundation to interpret our findings.[31-33] RR cortisol is hypothesized to be better than later postoperative measures because it is measured in closer proximity to a significant and relevant stressor: patients undergoing TSS. If the assessment of cortisol levels is done after at least 1 or 2 half-lives of cortisol, pituitary damage that occurred during surgery will manifest as a blunted response in comparison to those without damage. A greater difference is thus expected between patients who can adequately mount a stress response and those who acquire hypocortisolism. These findings are in keeping with the graded accuracy over time for early postoperative cortisol measurement in which the RR was most predictive, followed by day 1, 2, and 3 post-TSS MSC, respectively.

Clinical Utility of this Study

At our institution, endocrinologists used patients’ clinical presentation and follow-up MSC to assess the need for GC therapy or dynamic testing. Although the ITT is considered the gold standard for assessing HPA axis integrity, it has several disadvantages, including cost, safety issues, time intensiveness, and contraindications in certain patient populations.[8,12-15,34-36] It is more helpful for patients with equivocal findings.[8,15] Our approach used a standard considering the entire clinical and biochemical picture. We based it on each individual patient's need for long-term GC therapy, and only used dynamic testing when necessary. We used the ROC curves to determine optimal threshold values for early postoperative cortisol measures. Specifically, we found that a RR cortisol of 744.0 nmol/L (26.97 μg/dL) had 90.9% sensitivity and 73.7% specificity, while 757.5 nmol/L (27.46 μg/dL) had 100% sensitivity and 70.0% specificity for detecting GC therapy need. Having a robust RR cortisol threshold can help in guiding clinical decision-making. In our sample, 757.5 nmol/L had 100% sensitivity in detecting a need for GC therapy. Our cortisol threshold values were high compared to previous studies. This is expected since serum cortisol should rise higher immediately after a significant stressor like TSS as compared with a day or more after TSS. We could not identify any other factors, such as concomitant infections, that could explain the higher values observed. Although these results are promising, this value is likely specific to our patient sample. Future prospective studies must validate these findings before a threshold is recommended in general clinical practice.

Limitations

Our study had some limitations. Firstly, its retrospective nature made it difficult to obtain complete data for all variables. This is especially true given that we had some patients who did not follow-up with endocrinologists 6 to 8 wk after TSS. As well, we could not obtain complete data for every patient included in our study. Future studies could be improved by prospectively evaluating a larger number of patients, which can reduce the bias of missing data. Secondly, the cortisol thresholds derived from the ROC curves are likely specific to this patient sample. Larger studies are required before general clinical recommendations about cortisol thresholds can be made. Finally, not all surgeries were performed in the morning, and this may impact the value of the RR cortisol obtained postoperatively.

CONCLUSION

We showed that RR cortisol is an accurate predictor of the need for long-term GC replacement. An appropriate threshold value for RR cortisol was also derived in our sample. Future larger studies should validate these findings prospectively and derive optimal RR cortisol threshold values.

Disclosure

The authors have no personal, financial, or institutional interest in any of the drugs, materials, or devices described in this article.
  34 in total

1.  Can basal cortisol measurement be an alternative to the insulin tolerance test in the assessment of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis before and after pituitary surgery?

Authors:  Z Karaca; F Tanriverdi; H Atmaca; C Gokce; G Elbuken; A Selcuklu; K Unluhizarci; F Kelestimur
Journal:  Eur J Endocrinol       Date:  2010-06-08       Impact factor: 6.664

2.  Surgical complications associated with the endoscopic endonasal transsphenoidal approach for pituitary adenomas.

Authors:  Paolo Cappabianca; Luigi Maria Cavallo; AnnaMaria Colao; Enrico de Divitiis
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 5.115

3.  Impact of primary surgery on pituitary function in patients with non-functioning pituitary adenomas -- a study on 721 patients.

Authors:  P Nomikos; C Ladar; R Fahlbusch; M Buchfelder
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  2004-01-07       Impact factor: 2.216

Review 4.  Clinical practice. Glucocorticoid-induced bone disease.

Authors:  Robert S Weinstein
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2011-07-07       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 5.  Clinical review 62: Laboratory assessment of adrenal insufficiency.

Authors:  S K Grinspoon; B M Biller
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  1994-10       Impact factor: 5.958

6.  Glucocorticoid replacement therapy: are patients over treated and does it matter?

Authors:  S R Peacey; C Y Guo; A M Robinson; A Price; M A Giles; R Eastell; A P Weetman
Journal:  Clin Endocrinol (Oxf)       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 3.478

7.  Comparison of one week 0900 h serum cortisol, low and standard dose synacthen tests with a 4 to 6 week insulin hypoglycaemia test after pituitary surgery in assessing HPA axis.

Authors:  C H Courtney; A S McAllister; D R McCance; P M Bell; D R Hadden; H Leslie; B Sheridan; A B Atkinson
Journal:  Clin Endocrinol (Oxf)       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 3.478

Review 8.  Selective use of the insulin tolerance test to diagnose hypopituitarism.

Authors:  S Sarlos; W J Inder
Journal:  Intern Med J       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 2.048

9.  Pituitary hormonal loss and recovery after transsphenoidal adenoma removal.

Authors:  Nasrin Fatemi; Joshua R Dusick; Carlos Mattozo; David L McArthur; Pejman Cohan; John Boscardin; Christina Wang; Ronald S Swerdloff; Daniel F Kelly
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 4.654

10.  Use of morning serum cortisol level after transsphenoidal resection of pituitary adenoma to predict the need for long-term glucocorticoid supplementation.

Authors:  Nicholas F Marko; Vivek A Gonugunta; Amir H Hamrahian; Ali Usmani; Marc R Mayberg; Robert J Weil
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 5.115

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Machine learning applications in imaging analysis for patients with pituitary tumors: a review of the current literature and future directions.

Authors:  Ashirbani Saha; Samantha Tso; Jessica Rabski; Alireza Sadeghian; Michael D Cusimano
Journal:  Pituitary       Date:  2020-06       Impact factor: 4.107

Review 2.  Investigation of the Hypothalamo-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis: a contemporary synthesis.

Authors:  Zuleyha Karaca; Ashley Grossman; Fahrettin Kelestimur
Journal:  Rev Endocr Metab Disord       Date:  2021-03-26       Impact factor: 6.514

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.