| Literature DB >> 30766741 |
Johnette Peñas1, Vikki Carr de Los Reyes1, Ma Nemia Sucaldito1, Denisse Lou Manalili1, Herdie Hizon1, Rio Magpantay1.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: On 2 October 2015, the Event-Based Surveillance and Response Unit of the Department of Health (DOH), Philippines received a report of foodborne illness cases in Santa Cruz, Davao del Sur. A team from DOH was sent to conduct an investigation to identify the implicated source and determine risk factors.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30766741 PMCID: PMC6356042 DOI: 10.5365/wpsar.2017.8.1.010
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Western Pac Surveill Response J ISSN: 2094-7321
Fig. 1Number of cases by date and time of illness onset, cassava poisoning, Compound A, Santa Cruz, Davao del Sur, October 2015 (n = 14)
Factors associated with cassava poisoning, Compound A, Santa Cruz, Davao del Sur, October 2015
| Variables | Sick ( | Not sick ( | Crude RR | Adjusted RR** | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Male | 7 (50%) | 16 (31%) | 0.20 | 1.83 (0.73–4.56) | 1.28 (0.31–5.21) |
| 1–5 years old | 7 (50%) | 4 (9%) | < 0.01 | 4.91(2.16–11.18) | 4 964 152.23 |
| Food eaten* | |||||
| Fish | 14 (100%) | 49 (96%) | 0.61 | Undefined | - |
| Bread | 2 (14%) | 6 (12%) | 0.55 | 1.19 (0.32–4.36) | - |
| Egg | 1 (7%) | 4 (8%) | 0.71 | 0.92 (0.15–5.69) | - |
| Noodles | 1 (7%) | 0 (0%) | 0.21 | 4.92 (3.03–8.00) | - |
| Monggo | 0 (0%) | 2 (4%) | 0.61 | 0 (undefined) | - |
| Cassava | 13 (93%) | 3 (6%) | < 0.01 | 39.81 (5.64–280.99) | 208 (19.94–2169.32) |
| History of cassava intake | 11 (79%) | 46 (90%) | 0.23 | 0.51 (0.18–1.46) | - |
| Hygiene | |||||
| Washed hands before eating | 11 (79%) | 50 (98%) | 0.03 | 0.24 (0.11–0.52) | 0.14 (0.00–11.50) |
| Used soap in hand washing | 14 (100%) | 50 (98%) | - | - | - |
| Used spoon and fork | 0 (0%) | 5 (10%) | 0.28 | 0.00 (undefined) | - |
| Ate food while hot | 13 (93%) | 42 (82%) | 0.31 | 2.36 (0.35–16.11) | - |
| Washed hands after toilet use | 13 (93%) | 51 (100%) | 0.22 | 0.20 (0.13–0.33) | - |
CI, confidence interval; RR, relative risk
* May have more than one response
** Risk factors approaching significance (P < 0.2) in bivariate analysis were included in multivariable logistic regression using a forward stepwise procedure.