| Literature DB >> 30762730 |
Zhixiong Zhong1,2,3,4, Jing Liu2,3,5,4,6, Qifeng Zhang1,2,3,4, Wei Zhong1,2,3,4, Bin Li1,2,3,4, Cunren Li1,2,3,4, Zhidong Liu1,2,3,4, Min Yang1,2,3,4, Pingsen Zhao2,3,5,4,6.
Abstract
Coronary heart disease (CHD), one of the leading causes of death in the world, is a complex metabolic disorder due to genetic and environmental interactions. The potential mechanisms and diagnostic biomarkers for different types of coronary heart disease remain unclear. Metabolomics is increasingly considered to be a promising technology with the potential to identify metabolomic features in an attempt to distinguish the different stages of CHD.We aimed to investigate serum metabolite profiling between CHD patients and normal coronary artery (NCA) subjects and identify metabolic biomarkers associated with CHD progression in an ethnic Hakka population in southern China.Using a novel targeted metabolomics approach, we explored the metabolic characteristics of CHD patients. Blood samples from 302 patients with CHD and 59 NCA subjects were collected that analyses using targeted liquid-chromatography coupled with tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS).A total of 361 blood samples were determined using targeted LC-MS. Plasma concentrations for trimetlylamine oxide (TMAO), choline, creatinine, and carnitine were significantly higher in patients with CHD compared to the NCA cohort. Further, we observed that the concentration of the 4 metabolites were higher than that of the NCA group in any group of CHD, which including acute myocardial infarction (AMI), unstable angina (UA), and stable angina (SA). In addition, the diagnostic model was constructed based on the metabolites identified and the ROC curve of the NCA subjects and CHD patients were performed. For choline and creatinine, the AUCs ranged from 0.720 to 0.733. For TMAO and carnitine, the AUCs ranged from 0.568 to 0.600.In conclusion, the current study illustrates the distribution of 4 metabolites between CHD patients and NCA subjects. Metabolomics analysis may yield novel predictive biomarkers that will potentially provide value for clinical diagnosis of CHD.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 30762730 PMCID: PMC6407954 DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000014309
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Medicine (Baltimore) ISSN: 0025-7974 Impact factor: 1.817
Figure 1Comparisons in choline, TMAO, creatinine and cartinine levels between individuals with coronary heart disease (n = 302) and NCA (n = 59) for (A), (B), (C), (D), ∗∗P < .01. NCA = normal coronary artery, TMAO = trimetlylamine oxide.
Baseline clinical characteristics109.
Figure 2Choline, TMAO, creatinine and cartinine levels in different groups. (A) Comparison between NCA group and SA, UA, AMI groups for choline, respectively, ∗P < .05, P < .01, #P < .05, ##P < .01, P < .01, P < .01. (B) Comparison between NCA group and SA, UA, AMI groups for TMAO, respectively, #P < .05, ##P < .01, P < .01,P < .01. (C) For creatinine, comparison between NCA group and SA, UA, AMI groups for TMAO, respectively, ∗∗P < .01, ##P < .01,P < .01.(D) There have no significantly difference between NCA group and SA, UA, AMI groups for carnitine, respectively. AMI = acute myocardial infarction, NCA = normal coronary artery, SA = stable angina, TMAO = trimetlylamine oxide, UA = unstable angina.
Figure 3Receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve model of metabolites to discriminate CHD patients from NCA subjects. (A: choline; B: TMAO; C: creatinine; D: carnitine).