BACKGROUND: Metabolomics, the systematic analysis of low molecular weight biochemical compounds in a biological specimen, has been increasingly applied to biomarker discovery. CONTENT: Because no single analytical method can accommodate the chemical diversity of the entire metabolome, various methods such as nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy (NMR) and mass spectrometry (MS) have been employed, with the latter coupled to an array of separation techniques including gas and liquid chromatography. Whereas NMR can provide structural information and absolute quantification for select metabolites without the use of exogenous standards, MS tends to have much higher analytical sensitivity, enabling broader surveys of the metabolome. Both NMR and MS can be used to characterize metabolite data either in a targeted manner or in a nontargeted, pattern-recognition manner. In addition to technical considerations, careful sample selection and study design are important to minimize potential confounding influences on the metabolome, including diet, medications, and comorbitidies. To this end, metabolite profiling has been applied to human biomarker discovery in small-scale interventions, in which individuals are extremely well phenotyped and able to serve as their own biological controls, as well as in larger epidemiological cohorts. Understanding how metabolites relate to each other and to established risk markers for diseases such as diabetes and renal failure will be important in evaluating the potential value of these metabolites as clinically useful biomarkers. SUMMARY: Applied to both experimental and epidemiological study designs, metabolite profiling has begun to highlight the breadth metabolic disturbances that accompany human disease. Experimental work in model systems and integration with other functional genomic approaches will be required to establish a causal link between select biomarkers and disease pathogenesis.
BACKGROUND: Metabolomics, the systematic analysis of low molecular weight biochemical compounds in a biological specimen, has been increasingly applied to biomarker discovery. CONTENT: Because no single analytical method can accommodate the chemical diversity of the entire metabolome, various methods such as nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy (NMR) and mass spectrometry (MS) have been employed, with the latter coupled to an array of separation techniques including gas and liquid chromatography. Whereas NMR can provide structural information and absolute quantification for select metabolites without the use of exogenous standards, MS tends to have much higher analytical sensitivity, enabling broader surveys of the metabolome. Both NMR and MS can be used to characterize metabolite data either in a targeted manner or in a nontargeted, pattern-recognition manner. In addition to technical considerations, careful sample selection and study design are important to minimize potential confounding influences on the metabolome, including diet, medications, and comorbitidies. To this end, metabolite profiling has been applied to human biomarker discovery in small-scale interventions, in which individuals are extremely well phenotyped and able to serve as their own biological controls, as well as in larger epidemiological cohorts. Understanding how metabolites relate to each other and to established risk markers for diseases such as diabetes and renal failure will be important in evaluating the potential value of these metabolites as clinically useful biomarkers. SUMMARY: Applied to both experimental and epidemiological study designs, metabolite profiling has begun to highlight the breadth metabolic disturbances that accompany human disease. Experimental work in model systems and integration with other functional genomic approaches will be required to establish a causal link between select biomarkers and disease pathogenesis.
Authors: Joanne T Brindle; Henrik Antti; Elaine Holmes; George Tranter; Jeremy K Nicholson; Hugh W L Bethell; Sarah Clarke; Peter M Schofield; Elaine McKilligin; David E Mosedale; David J Grainger Journal: Nat Med Date: 2002-11-25 Impact factor: 53.440
Authors: John C Lindon; Elaine Holmes; Mary E Bollard; Elizabeth G Stanley; Jeremy K Nicholson Journal: Biomarkers Date: 2004 Jan-Feb Impact factor: 2.658
Authors: Gregory D Lewis; Laurie Farrell; Malissa J Wood; Maryann Martinovic; Zoltan Arany; Glenn C Rowe; Amanda Souza; Susan Cheng; Elizabeth L McCabe; Elaine Yang; Xu Shi; Rahul Deo; Frederick P Roth; Aarti Asnani; Eugene P Rhee; David M Systrom; Marc J Semigran; Ramachandran S Vasan; Steven A Carr; Thomas J Wang; Marc S Sabatine; Clary B Clish; Robert E Gerszten Journal: Sci Transl Med Date: 2010-05-26 Impact factor: 17.956
Authors: Christopher B Newgard; Jie An; James R Bain; Michael J Muehlbauer; Robert D Stevens; Lillian F Lien; Andrea M Haqq; Svati H Shah; Michelle Arlotto; Cris A Slentz; James Rochon; Dianne Gallup; Olga Ilkayeva; Brett R Wenner; William S Yancy; Howard Eisenson; Gerald Musante; Richard S Surwit; David S Millington; Mark D Butler; Laura P Svetkey Journal: Cell Metab Date: 2009-04 Impact factor: 27.287
Authors: Christian Gieger; Ludwig Geistlinger; Elisabeth Altmaier; Martin Hrabé de Angelis; Florian Kronenberg; Thomas Meitinger; Hans-Werner Mewes; H-Erich Wichmann; Klaus M Weinberger; Jerzy Adamski; Thomas Illig; Karsten Suhre Journal: PLoS Genet Date: 2008-11-28 Impact factor: 5.917
Authors: James R Bain; Robert D Stevens; Brett R Wenner; Olga Ilkayeva; Deborah M Muoio; Christopher B Newgard Journal: Diabetes Date: 2009-11 Impact factor: 9.461
Authors: David M Mutch; Jens C Fuhrmann; Dietrich Rein; Jan C Wiemer; Jean-Luc Bouillot; Christine Poitou; Karine Clément Journal: PLoS One Date: 2009-11-19 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Dong D Wang; Yan Zheng; Estefanía Toledo; Cristina Razquin; Miguel Ruiz-Canela; Marta Guasch-Ferré; Edward Yu; Dolores Corella; Enrique Gómez-Gracia; Miquel Fiol; Ramón Estruch; Emilio Ros; José Lapetra; Montserrat Fito; Fernando Aros; Lluis Serra-Majem; Clary B Clish; Jordi Salas-Salvadó; Liming Liang; Miguel A Martínez-González; Frank B Hu Journal: Int J Epidemiol Date: 2018-12-01 Impact factor: 7.196
Authors: Marta Guasch-Ferré; Yan Zheng; Miguel Ruiz-Canela; Adela Hruby; Miguel A Martínez-González; Clary B Clish; Dolores Corella; Ramon Estruch; Emilio Ros; Montserrat Fitó; Courtney Dennis; Isabel M Morales-Gil; Fernando Arós; Miquel Fiol; José Lapetra; Lluís Serra-Majem; Frank B Hu; Jordi Salas-Salvadó Journal: Am J Clin Nutr Date: 2016-04-20 Impact factor: 7.045