| Literature DB >> 30761648 |
Anna C Domen1, Sjors C F van de Weijer2, Monique W Jaspers3, Damiaan Denys1, Dorien H Nieman1.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Cognitive impairment affects many psychiatric patients, influences daily functioning, and should be an important treatment focus. Assessment of cognitive status is crucial in cognitive remediation studies. However, current test batteries have limitations. A new, online tool, the MyCognition Quotient (MyCQ), was developed to assess cognition within 30 min. We present the psychometric properties and aim to determine the validity of the MyCQ by comparing it with the Cambridge Neuropsychological Automated Test Battery (CANTAB).Entities:
Keywords: assessment; cognitive functioning; neuropsychological tests; psychometrics
Mesh:
Year: 2019 PMID: 30761648 PMCID: PMC6850139 DOI: 10.1002/mpr.1775
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Methods Psychiatr Res ISSN: 1049-8931 Impact factor: 4.035
Individual MyCQ tests listed with test equivalents and corresponding cognitive domains
| MyCQ subtest | Proposed domain | Validated test equivalent | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Simple reaction time (SRT) | Psychomotor speed/attention | Donders type A |
| 2 | Choice reaction time (CRT) | Psychomotor speed/attention | Donders type B |
| 3 | Go no go reaction time (GNG) | Psychomotor speed/attention | Donders type C |
| 4 | Verbal memory recognition (VeMR) | Episodic memory | Rey auditory verbal learning test |
| 5 | Visual memory recognition (ViMR) | Episodic memory | Benton visual retention test |
| 6 | N‐back 1 (NB1) | Working memory | One back |
| 7 | N‐back 2 (NB2) | Working memory | Two back |
| 8 | Coding (COD) | Working memory | Digit symbol substitution test |
| 9 | Trail making test A (TMA) | Executive function | Trail making test part A |
| 10 | Trail making test B (TMB) | Executive function | Trail making test part B |
Note. MyCQ: MyCognition Quotient.
Baseline demographic data and MyCQ outcomes of the sample, outliers removed
| Characteristic | Mean ( | Range |
|---|---|---|
| Age | 32 (10.4) | |
| NART | 99 (14.2) | |
| Gender | ||
| Male | 44 (50.6) | |
| Female | 43 (49.4) | |
| Working? | ||
| Yes | 52 (59.8) | |
| No | 34 (39.1) | |
| DSM‐IV‐TR diagnosis | ||
| Psychotic disorder | 36 (41.4) | |
| Obsessive–compulsive disorder | 36 (41.4) | |
| Depressive disorder | 15 (17.2) | |
| Level of education completed | ||
| Higher tertiary | 27 (31.0) | |
| Lower tertiary | 20 (23.0) | |
| Secondary | 34 (39.1) | |
| Primary | 3 (3.4) | |
| None | 2 (2.3) | |
| Unknown | 1 (1.1) | |
| Marital status | ||
| Unmarried | 61 (70.1) | |
| Married or living together | 21 (24.1) | |
| Divorced | 4 (4.6) | |
| Unknown | 1 (1.1) | |
| MyCQ subtest scores | ||
| SRT Mean latency | 375.9 (61.03) | 258–564 |
| SRT Total errors | 1.0 (1.50) | 0–7 |
| CRT Mean latency | 466.2 (93.79) | 313–823 |
| CRT Total errors | 1.6 (2.85) | 0–14 |
| GNG Mean latency | 510.4 (79.29) | 371–793 |
| GNG Total errors | 1.4 (1.62) | 0–6 |
| VeMR Mean latency | 931.0 (195.79) | 582–1462 |
| VeMR Total errors | 11.4 (7.59) | 0–37 |
| ViMR Mean latency | 848.9 (142.69) | 544–1202 |
| ViMR Total errors | 8.8 (7.30) | 0–33 |
| NB1 Mean latency | 796.0 (220.38) | 461–1456 |
| NB1 Total errors | 2.7 (4.12) | 0–27 |
| NB2 Mean latency | 1152.8 (338.59) | 633–2384 |
| NB2 Total errors | 8.4 (7.15) | 0–29 |
| COD Mean latency | 900.1 (217.17) | 579–1865 |
| COD Total errors | 3.1 (2.97) | 0–13 |
| TMA Mean latency | 888.4 (229.00) | 530–1617 |
| TMA Total errors | 0.2 (0.66) | 0–3 |
| TMB Mean latency | 1218.9 (399.63) | 613–2646 |
| TMB Total errors | 0.6 (1.01) | 0–4 |
Note. Mean latency in milliseconds. SD: standard deviation; NART: national adult reading test; SRT: simple reaction time; CRT: choice reaction time; GNG: go no go reaction time; VeMR: verbal memory recognition; ViMR: visual memory recognition; NB1: N‐back 1; NB2: N‐back 2; COD: coding; TMA: trail making test A; TMB: trail making test B; MyCQ: MyCognition Quotient.
Factor structure of the MyCQ outcome measures
| Final five‐component model | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Psychomotor speed | Attention | Episodic memory | Working memory | Executive functioning | |
| SRT mean latency | −0.917 | ||||
| CRT mean latency | −0.664 | ||||
| GNG mean latency | −0.899 | ||||
| SRT total errors | 0.840 | ||||
| CRT total errors | 0.721 | ||||
| VeMR total errors | 0.875 | ||||
| ViMR total errors | 0.904 | ||||
| VeMR mean latency | −0.939 | ||||
| ViMR mean latency | −0.883 | ||||
| NB1 total errors | 0.648 | ||||
| NB2 mean latency | −0.689 | ||||
| COD mean latency | 0.680 | ||||
| TMA mean latency | 0.676 | ||||
| TMB mean latency | 0.839 | ||||
| Variance explained | 7.9 | 9.1 | 11.8 | 33.6 | 12.9 |
| Correlations among components | |||||
| Psychomotor speed | ‐ | ||||
| Attention | 0.198 | ‐ | |||
| Episodic memory | 0.314 | 0.191 | ‐ | ||
| Working memory | 0.480 | 0.091 | 0.123 | ‐ | |
| Executive functioning | 0.437 | 0.220 | 0.103 | 0.312 | ‐ |
| MyCQ sum score | 0.774 | 0.446 | 0.538 | 0.742 | 0.619 |
Note. SRT: simple reaction time; CRT: choice reaction time; GNG: go no go reaction time; VeMR: verbal memory recognition; ViMR: visual memory recognition; NB1: N‐back 1; NB2: N‐back 2; COD: coding; TMA: trail making test A; TMB: trail making test B; MyCQ: MyCognition Quotient. Pattern matrix and correlations between MyCQ domains. Principal Component Analyses with Oblimin rotation and Kaiser Normalization. Factor loadings <0.4 are hidden. Rotation converged in 12 iterations.
Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2‐tailed).
Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level (2‐tailed).
Convergent and divergent validity: Pearson correlations between MyCQ and CANTAB domains
| CANTAB Domains | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Psychomotor speed | Attention | Episodic memory | Working memory | Executive functioning | ||
| Psychomotor speed |
| 0.311 | 0.192 | 0.328 | 0.243 | |
| Attention | −0.061 |
| 0.065 | 0.182 | 0.172 | |
|
| Episodic memory | 0.194 | 0.374 |
| 0.353 | 0.319 |
| Working memory | 0.371 | 0.245 | 0.123 |
| 0.089 | |
| Executive functioning | 0.360 | 0.432 | −0.066 | 0.442 |
| |
Note. CANTAB: Cambridge Neuropsychological Automated Test Battery; MyCQ: MyCognition Quotient. Values printed in bold style correspond to convergent validity, values printed in regular style correspond to divergent validity.
Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2‐tailed).
Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level (2‐tailed).
Figure 1Scatterplot of the relation between MyCognition Quotient (MyCQ) and Cambridge Neuropsychological Automated Test Battery (CANTAB) sum scores (r = 0.664)