| Literature DB >> 30759174 |
Kyoko Shimamoto1, Jessica D Gipson1.
Abstract
Maternal and newborn mortality remain unacceptably high in sub-Saharan Africa where use of a skilled birth attendant (SBA) at delivery has remained low. Despite the recognized importance of women's empowerment as a key determinant of maternal and newborn health, evidence from sub-Saharan Africa is more limited. Using data from the 2010 Tanzania Demographic and Health Survey (n = 4,340), this study employs a robust method-structural equation modeling (SEM)-to investigate the complex and multidimensional pathways through which women's empowerment affects SBA use. The results show that women's education and household decision-making are positively associated with SBA use. However, not all empowerment dimensions have similar effects. Attitudes towards sex negotiation and violence as well as early marriage are not significant factors in Tanzania. Mediation analysis also confirms the indirect effect of education on SBA use only through household decision-making. The findings underscore the utility of structural equation modeling when examining complex and multidimensional constructs, such as empowerment, and demonstrate potential causal inference to better inform policy and programmatic recommendations.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2019 PMID: 30759174 PMCID: PMC6374020 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0212038
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Fig 1An integrated conceptual framework to predict influences of women’s status and multi-dimensional empowerment on SBA use.
Characteristics of participating, currently married women with at least one birth in last 5 years (n = 4,340 weighted; n = 4,334 unweighted), TDHS 2010.
| Freq | Weighted | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Variables | Mean or Proportion | SE | |||
| Skilled Birth Attendant use at the last childbirth | 2,190 | 50.74 | 1.52 | ||
| Household decision-making (Mean, scored 0–3) | 1.43 | 0.02 | |||
| Attitudes towards violence (Mean, 0–5) | 3.15 | 0.04 | |||
| Attitudes towards sex negotiation (Mean, 0–2) | 1.38 | 0.02 | |||
| Age at first marriage (Mean) | 18.28 | 0.07 | |||
| Education (Mean in years) | 5.07 | 0.09 | |||
| Current age | 29.41 | 0.15 | |||
| Household wealth quintile | |||||
| Poorest | 809 | 19.77 | 1.08 | ||
| Poorer | 944 | 22.80 | 0.98 | ||
| Middle | 889 | 21.40 | 0.92 | ||
| Richer | 936 | 19.93 | 1.13 | ||
| Richest | 756 | 16.09 | 1.17 | ||
| Employment for payment | |||||
| Currently employed or employed last 12 months | 1,688 | 37.96 | 1.09 | ||
| Parity (Total number of children ever born) | 3.92 | 0.05 | |||
| Marital relationships | |||||
| Monogamous union | 3,364 | 79.09 | 1.05 | ||
| Polygamous as 1st wife | 428 | 8.86 | 0.52 | ||
| Polygamous as 2nd or lower | 542 | 12.05 | 0.80 | ||
| Household head | 247 | 5.76 | 0.48 | ||
| Place of residence | |||||
| Urban | 855 | 21.31 | 1.19 | ||
| Rural | 3,479 | 78.69 | 1.19 | ||
| Having son(s) | 3,573 | 81.54 | 0.66 | ||
| Relative age | -7.21 | 0.15 | |||
| Relative education | |||||
| More education than husband | 867 | 17.43 | 0.68 | ||
| Almost the same (the same, or slightly less within 2 years) | 2,154 | 52.76 | 1.04 | ||
| Less education than husband (by 2 years or more) | 1,313 | 29.81 | 1.02 | ||
| Perceived difficulty of health care (Mean, scored 0–4) | 0.61 | 0.02 | |||
Note: Frequency missing = 1 (with decision-making), 82 (with perceptions of gender norms against violence), 4 (with employment), 32 (with marital relationships), 23 (with relative age), and 17 (with perceived difficulty in accessing health care).
Factor analysis for indicators of empowerment (n = 4,340), TDHS 2010.
| Household decision-making | Decision on own health care | 0.795 | - |
| Decision on major household purchases | 0.873 | 32.338 | |
| Decision on visits to family or relatives | 0.933 | 32.268 | |
| Attitudes towards violence | Violence if going out without telling her husband | 0.887 | - |
| Violence if neglects the children | 0.922 | 84.620 | |
| Violence if argues with him | 0.933 | 84.459 | |
| Violence if refuses to have sex with him | 0.881 | 79.617 | |
| Violence if burns the food | 0.866 | 56.159 | |
| Attitudes towards sex negotiation | Perceived ability in refusing sex | 0.894 | - |
| Perceived ability in asking condom use | 0.658 | 8.059 |
Note: All factor loadings are significant at p<0.05. RMSEA = 0.028 (CI = 0.024–0.033); CFI = 0.995; TLI = 0.993.
Standardized path coefficients of the latent variable SEM (n = 4,340 for the analysis), TDHS 2010.
| Dependent variables in the equation (Y): | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| [Column 1] | [Column 2] | [Column 3] | [Column 4] | [Column 5] | ||
| (1) Age at first marriage | 0.006 | -0.030 | 0.002 | 0.006 | ||
| (2) Decision-making power | 0.080 | |||||
| (3) Attitudes towards violence | -0.004 | |||||
| (4) Attitudes towards sex negotiation | 0.044 | |||||
| Education | 0.177 | 0.132 | 0.086 | 0.225 | 0.121 | |
| Age at childbirth | 0.908 | 0.194 | 0.136 | 0.013 | 0.181 | |
| Parity | -0.804 | -0.111 | -0.132 | -0.045 | -0.211 | |
| Employment for payment | -0.015 | 0.062 | 0.083 | 0.055 | 0.046 | |
| Household head | 0.003 | 0.099 | -0.019 | 0.068 | 0.005 | |
| Urban residence | 0.013 | 0.031 | -0.047 | 0.030 | 0.152 | |
| Having son(s) | -0.051 | 0.055 | 0.002 | 0.006 | -0.070 | |
| Household wealth (the 2nd lowest) | 0.017 | -0.033 | 0.065 | 0.020 | 0.014 | |
| Household wealth (the 3rd lowest) | 0.010 | -0.050 | 0.000 | 0.034 | 0.080 | |
| Household wealth (the 4th lowest) | -0.026 | -0.091 | 0.039 | 0.039 | 0.150 | |
| Household wealth (the highest) | 0.002 | 0.006 | 0.239 | 0.084 | 0.289 | |
| Polygamous union as a first wife | -0.057 | -0.060 | -0.023 | -0.018 | -0.061 | |
| Polygamous union as a second or lower | 0.036 | -0.117 | -0.001 | -0.069 | -0.065 | |
| Relative age | 0.064 | 0.036 | 0.022 | 0.011 | 0.001 | |
| Less education than husband | 0.062 | 0.032 | 0.047 | 0.052 | 0.038 | |
| More education than husband | 0.031 | -0.025 | 0.007 | 0.033 | -0.032 | |
| Perceived difficulty in accessing health care | -0.121 | |||||
Note
***p <0.001
**p<0.01
*p<0.05.
Reference groups: residence = rural; household wealth = the lowest; marital relationship = monogamous union; relative education = almost the same education with husbands. DF = 169, RMSEA = 0.013, CFI = 0.993, TLI = 0.989, WRMR = 0.849. R-square: 0.367 (age at first marriage), 0.087 (decision-making), 0.090 (perceptions against violence), 0.101 (perceptions for sex negotiation), 0.395 (SBA use).
Fig 2A diagram of the latent variable SEM.
Note: sba = SBA use; f1:decis = decision-making power; f2:neg = attitudes towards sex negotiation; f3:viol = attitudes towards violence; age at m = age at first marriage; edu = education. Standardized path coefficients are reported with the following significance levels: *** p <0.001; ** p<0.01; * p<0.05. Factor loadings and correlations among disturbances are all significant at p<0.001. Control variables are not included in the figure.
Summary of standardized direct and indirect effects of education on SBA use (n = 4,340), TDHS 2010.
| coefficient | t value | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Total effect | 0.143 | 5.212 | |
| Direct effect | 0.121 | 4.326 | |
| Total indirect effect | 0.021 | 2.430 | |
| Indirect effect via | Age at first marriage | 0.001 | 0.220 |
| Decision-making power | 0.011 | 2.335 | |
| Attitudes towards violence | 0.000 | -0.144 | |
| Attitudes towards sex negotiation | 0.010 | 1.239 | |
| Age at first marriage then decision-making power | 0.000 | 0.256 | |
| Age at first marriage then attitudes towards violence | 0.000 | 0.070 | |
| Age at first marriage then attitudes towards sex negotiation | 0.000 | 0.145 |
Note
***p <0.001
**p<0.01
*p<0.05.