| Literature DB >> 29143630 |
Kyoko Shimamoto1, Jessica D Gipson2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Despite the reduction in maternal deaths globally, maternal mortality rates remain unacceptably high, particularly in some regions of the world. In sub-Saharan Africa, maternal mortality rates have even increased recently, with 201,000 deaths in 2015 as compared to 179,000 in 2013. Use of a skilled birth attendant (SBA) at delivery has remained low, despite evidence of the effectiveness of SBAs in reducing maternal deaths. Women's empowerment is increasingly recognized as a key determinant of maternal health care-seeking and outcomes, yet empirical examinations of the linkages between women's empowerment and delivery care use are particularly limited, especially from sub-Saharan Africa.Entities:
Keywords: Delivery care; Maternal mortality; Skilled birth attendant; Structural equation modeling; Sub-Saharan Africa; Women’s empowerment; Women’s status
Mesh:
Year: 2017 PMID: 29143630 PMCID: PMC5688451 DOI: 10.1186/s12884-017-1499-x
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Pregnancy Childbirth ISSN: 1471-2393 Impact factor: 3.007
Fig. 1A conceptual framework on women’s status, empowerment, and SBA use
Characteristics of participating, currently married women with at least one birth in last 5 years (n = 7451), Senegal DHS 2010
| Variables | Freq. | Weighted | SE |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mean or proportion | |||
| Outcome | |||
| Skilled birth attendant use at the last childbirth | 4251 | 66.30 | 1.27 |
| Mediators: women's empowerment measures | |||
| Household decision-making (mean, scored 0–3) | 0.92 | 0.03 | |
| Attitudes towards violence (mean, 0–5) | 2.80 | 0.05 | |
| Attitudes towards sex negotiation (mean, 0–2) | 0.60 | 0.02 | |
| Age at first marriage (mean) | 18.29 | 0.10 | |
| Demographics and perceived accessibility of health care | |||
| Education (mean in years) | 1.79 | 0.08 | |
| Current age | 29.40 | 0.12 | |
| Household wealth quintile | |||
| Poorest | 2264 | 22.38 | 1.31 |
| Poorer | 1882 | 20.95 | 1.18 |
| Middle | 1534 | 19.19 | 1.13 |
| Richer | 1056 | 19.85 | 1.34 |
| Richest | 715 | 17.63 | 1.12 |
| Employment for payment | |||
| Currently employed or employed last 12 months | 3386 | 46.04 | 1.12 |
| Parity (total number of children ever born) | 3.81 | 0.04 | |
| Marital relationships | |||
| Monogamous union | 4909 | 68.19 | 0.83 |
| Polygamous as 1st wife | 991 | 12.73 | 0.44 |
| Polygamous as 2nd or lower | 1550 | 19.08 | 0.55 |
| Household head | 322 | 4.98 | 0.38 |
| Place of residence | |||
| Urban | 2267 | 39.95 | 1.62 |
| Rural | 5184 | 60.05 | 1.62 |
| Perceived difficulty in accessing health care (Mean, scored 0-4) | 1.23 | 0.04 | |
Frequency missing = 119 (with attitudes towards violence), 1 (with marital relationships)
SE standard error
Factor analysis for indicators of empowerment (n = 7451), Senegal DHS 2010–2011
| Latent construct | Aspects asked about by survey | Factor loadings (EFA) |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Household decision-making | Decision on own health care | 0.916 | – |
| Decision on major household purchases | 0.869 | 38.927 | |
| Decision on visits to family or relatives | 0.851 | 42.613 | |
| Attitudes towards violence | Violence if she goes out without telling her husband | 0.917 | – |
| Violence if she neglects the children | 0.933 | 101.880 | |
| Violence if she argues with him | 0.963 | 122.107 | |
| Violence if she refuses to have sex with him | 0.911 | 101.322 | |
| Violence if she burns the food | 0.822 | 63.985 | |
| Gender norms for sex negotiation | Perceived ability in refusing sex | 0.803 | – |
| Perceived ability in asking for condom use | 0.771 | 8.305 |
In the CFA, the path of the first indicator is constrained to 1 (thus t value was not calculated). Significance of t values refers to unstandardized parameter values. All the factor loadings are significant at p < 0.05. RMSEA = 0.016, CFI = 0.998, TLI = 0.997, WRMR = 1.012
Standardized path coefficients of the latent variable SEM (n = 7451), Senegal DHS 2010–2011
| Predictors in the equation ( | Dependent variables in the equation ( | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| [Column 1] | [Column 2] | [Column 3] | [Column 4] | [Column 5] | |
| Endogenous variables | |||||
| (1) Age at first marriage | –0.014 | 0.003 | 0.046* | 0.020 | |
| (2) Decision-making power | 0.005 | ||||
| (3) Attitudes against violence | 0.062* | ||||
| (4) Attitudes towards sex negotiation | 0.094*** | ||||
| Exogenous variables | |||||
| Education | 0.102*** | 0.100** | 0.215** | 0.156*** | 0.068* |
| Age | 0.877*** | 0.097* | 0.006 | 0.026 | 0.103** |
| Parity | –0.749*** | 0.042 | –0.031 | –0.020 | –0.122*** |
| Employment for payment | –0.022 | 0.160*** | 0.028 | –0.016 | –0.039* |
| Household head | –0.025* | 0.070*** | –0.018 | 0.011 | 0.005 |
| Urban residence | 0.008 | 0.101* | 0.092* | 0.093** | 0.170*** |
| Having son(s) | –0.020 | –0.002 | –0.022 | 0.010 | –0.047** |
| Household wealth (the 2nd lowest) | 0.026* | –0.063* | 0.001 | 0.086*** | 0.150*** |
| Household wealth (the 3rd lowest) | 0.047*** | –0.034 | –0.021 | 0.117*** | 0.261*** |
| Household wealth (the 4th lowest) | 0.066*** | –0.013 | –0.005 | 0.233*** | 0.342*** |
| Household wealth (the highest) | 0.047* | 0.040 | 0.074 | 0.260*** | 0.407*** |
| Polygamous union as a first wife | –0.090*** | –0.012 | 0.005 | –0.024 | –0.039* |
| Polygamous union as a second or lower | –0.027* | –0.021 | –0.034 | –0.070*** | –0.045** |
| Less education than husband | 0.042* | 0.018 | 0.103*** | 0.048** | –0.004 |
| More education than husband | –0.014 | –0.009 | –0.018 | –0.008 | –0.070** |
| Perceived difficulty in accessing health care | –0.067*** | ||||
***p < 0.001, **p < 0.01, *p < 0.05. Reference groups: residence = rural; household wealth = the lowest; marital relationship = monogamous union; relative education = almost the same education as husband
DF (Degree of Freedom) = 109, RMSEA = 0.011, CFI = 0.994, TLI = 0.991, WRMR = 0.915
R squared: 0.495 (age at first marriage), 0.113 (decision-making), 0.212 (attitudes towards violence), 0.130 (attitudes towards sex negotiation), 0.457 (SBA use)
Fig. 2A diagram of the latent variable SEM. sba SBA use, f1:decis decision-making power, f2:neg attitudes towards sex negotiation, f3:viol attitudes towards violence, age at m age at first marriage, edu education. Standardized path coefficients are reported with the following significance levels: ***p < 0.001, **p < 0.01, *p < 0.05. Factor loadings and correlations among disturbances are all significant at p < 0.001. Control variables are not included in the figure
Summary of standardized direct and indirect effects of education on SBA use (n = 7451), Senegal DHS 2010–2011
| Coefficient |
| ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Total effect | 0.099 | 2.989*** | |
| Direct effect | 0.068 | 2.006* | |
| Total indirect effect | 0.031 | 4.582*** | |
| Indirect effect via: | Age at first marriage | 0.002 | 1.003 |
| Decision-making power | 0.000 | 0.166 | |
| Attitudes towards violence | 0.015 | 3.217*** | |
| Attitudes towards sex negotiation | 0.013 | 2.242* | |
| Age at first marriage then decision-making power | 0.000 | –0.161 | |
| Age at first marriage then attitudes towards violence | 0.000 | 1.975* | |
| Age at first marriage then attitudes towards sex negotiation | 0.000 | 0.082 |
***p < 0.001, **p < 0.01, *p < 0.05