| Literature DB >> 21214960 |
Rhoune Ochako1, Jean-Christophe Fotso, Lawrence Ikamari, Anne Khasakhala.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Use of maternal health services is an effective means for reducing the risk of maternal morbidity and mortality, especially in places where the general health status of women is poor. This study was guided by the following objectives: 1) To determine the relationship between timing of first antenatal care (ANC) visit and type of delivery assistance 2) To establish the determinants of timing of first ANC visit and type delivery assistance.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2011 PMID: 21214960 PMCID: PMC3022772 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2393-11-1
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Pregnancy Childbirth ISSN: 1471-2393 Impact factor: 3.007
Sample characteristics of women aged 15-24 at birth of last child
| Number | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|
| Urban | 513 | 30.6 |
| Rural | 1,162 | 69.4 |
| Poor | 630 | 37.6 |
| Medium | 551 | 32.9 |
| Rich | 494 | 29.5 |
| None | 235 | 14.0 |
| Primary | 1,087 | 64.9 |
| Secondary+ | 353 | 21.1 |
| Kikuyu | 329 | 19.6 |
| Luhya | 293 | 17.5 |
| Luo | 222 | 13.3 |
| Kamba | 155 | 9.3 |
| Other | 676 | 40.4 |
| 1 | 845 | 50.5 |
| 2 | 488 | 29.1 |
| 3+ | 342 | 20.4 |
| 15-19 | 534 | 31.8 |
| 20-24 | 1,143 | 68.2 |
| Never married | 256 | 15.3 |
| Formerly married | 154 | 9.2 |
| Currently married | 1,265 | 75.5 |
| None | 227 | 13.6 |
| Late | 1,265 | 75.5 |
| Early | 183 | 10.9 |
| None | 434 | 25.9 |
| TBA | 411 | 24.5 |
| Skilled professional | 830 | 49.6 |
Odds ratio of various covariates on timing of first antenatal care visit among young women in Kenya
| Col. 1 | Col. 2 | Col. 3 | Col. 4 | |||||
| Rural | 0.625 | ** | Samea | 0.747 | Same | |||
| Medium | 2.519 | ** | 1.053 | 1.310 | † | Same | ||
| Rich | 2.685 | ** | 1.516 | * | 1.230 | Same | ||
| None | 0.200 | ** | 1.716 | ** | 0.244 | ** | 1.947 | ** |
| Secondary+ | 1.323 | † | Same | 1.101 | Same | |||
| Luhya | 0.615 | * | Same | 0.731 | Same | |||
| Luo | 0.593 | † | 1.185 | 0.610 | † | 1.276 | ||
| Kamba | 0.955 | Same | 1.057 | Same | ||||
| Other | 0.324 | ** | 1.044 | 0.664 | † | 1.080 | ||
| 2 | 0.824 | Same | 0.746 | * | Same | |||
| 3+ | 0.368 | ** | 0.663 | † | 0.455 | ** | Same | |
| 20-24 | 0.940 | Same | 1.119 | Same | ||||
| Formerly married | 1.084 | Same | 1.515 | Same | ||||
| Currently married | 1.147 | Same | 1.936 | ** | Same | |||
p < .10; p < .05; **p < .01
Same: The Odds ratio for None vs (Late/Early) is the same as that of (None/Late) vs Early.
Odds ratio of various covariates on type of delivery assistance among young women in Kenya
| Col. 1 | Col. 2 | Col. 3 | Col. 4 | |||||
| Rural | 0.942 | ** | 0.264 | ** | 0.791 | ** | 0.561 | ** |
| Medium | 1.400 | ** | 2.726 | ** | 1.157 | 1.540 | ** | |
| Rich | 4.285 | ** | 8.256 | ** | 3.033 | ** | 3.033 | |
| None | 0.978 | 0.243 | ** | 1.602 | ** | 0.359 | ** | |
| Secondary+ | 2.864 | ** | Sameb | 1.776 | ** | Same | ||
| Luhya | 0.627 | * | 0.165 | ** | 0.890 | 0.200 | ** | |
| Luo | 1.402 | 0.307 | ** | 1.681 | * | 0.284 | ** | |
| Kamba | 0.556 | ** | 0.211 | ** | 0.667 | †| 0.218 | ** |
| Other | 0.475 | ** | 0.184 | ** | 0.671 | * | 0.391 | ** |
| 2 | 0.530 | ** | 0.386 | ** | 0.456 | ** | Same | |
| 3+ | 0.419 | ** | 0.219 | ** | 0.378 | ** | Same | |
| 20-24 | 0.925 | Same | 1.600 | ** | 1.130 | |||
| Formerly married | 1.821 | ** | Same | 0.892 | Same | |||
| Currently married | 1.792 | ** | Same | 1.071 | Same | |||
| Late | 1.338 | † | 4.133 | ** | 1.123 | 2.053 | ** | |
| Early | 1.897 | ** | 6.611 | ** | 1.592 | † | 3.524 | ** |
†p < .10; *p < .05; **p < .01
SP: Skilled Professional
Same: The odds ratio for None vs (TBA/SP) is the same as that of (None/TBA) vs SP.
Figure 1Bivariate association between timing of ANC visit and type of delivery assistance. □ Skilled professional ■ TBA ■ None.