| Literature DB >> 30754633 |
Marzia Ferretti1, Francesco Cavani2, Laura Roli3, Marta Checchi4, Maria Sara Magarò5, Jessika Bertacchini6, Carla Palumbo7.
Abstract
The present study is the second step (concerning normal diet resto<span class="<span class="Chemical">Species">ration) of the our previous study (concerning the <spaspan>n class="Chemical">calcium-free diet) to determine whether normal diet restoration, with/without concomitant PTH (1-34) administration, can influence amounts and deposition sites of the total bone mass. Histomorphometric evaluations and immunohistochemical analysis for Sclerostin expression were conducted on the vertebral bodies and femurs in the rat model. The final goals are (i) to define timing and manners of bone mass changes when calcium is restored to the diet, (ii) to analyze the different involvement of the two bony architectures having different metabolism (i.e., trabecular versus cortical bone), and (iii) to verify the eventual role of PTH (1-34) administration. Results evidenced the greater involvement of the trabecular bone with respect to the cortical bone, in response to different levels of calcium content in the diet, and the effect of PTH, mostly in the recovery of trabecular bony architecture. The main findings emerged from the present study are (i) the importance of the interplay between mineral homeostasis and skeletal homeostasis in modulating and guiding bone's response to dietary/metabolic alterations and (ii) the evidence that the more involved bony architecture is the trabecular bone, the most susceptible to the dynamical balance of the two homeostases.Entities:
Keywords: PTH (1-34); calcium diet content; mineral homeostasis; rat; skeletal homeostasis; trabecular bone
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 30754633 PMCID: PMC6387065 DOI: 10.3390/ijms20030753
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Mol Sci ISSN: 1422-0067 Impact factor: 5.923
Figure 1Schematic drawing showing the rats randomized in groups for the different experimental conditions. Group 2: control, normal diet for 4 weeks. Group 3: calcium-deprived diet for 4 weeks. Group 4: calcium-deprived diet with concomitant administration of PTH (1-34) 40 μg/kg/day for 4 weeks. Group 5: calcium-deprived diet for 4 weeks and successive normal diet restoration for 4 weeks. Group 6: calcium-deprived diet for 4 weeks and successive normal diet restoration with concomitant administration of PTH (1-34) 40 μg/kg/day for 4 weeks. Group 7: calcium-deprived diet with concomitant administration of PTH (1-34) 40 μg/kg/day for 4 weeks and successive normal diet restoration for 4 weeks. Group 8: calcium-deprived diet with concomitant administration of PTH (1-34) 40 μg/kg/day for four weeks and successive normal diet restoration with concomitant administration of PTH (1-34) 40 μg/kg/day for 4 weeks. Group 9: control, normal diet for eight weeks.
Body weights of rats at the time of arrival (TA), at the beginning (T0), after four weeks (T1), and after eight weeks (T2) of experimentation.
| Group | Weight at TA | Weight at T0 | Weight at T1 | Weight at T2 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2 | 405 ± 32 | 436 ± 35 °°° | 526 ± 47 *** | |
| 3 | 405 ± 32 | 429 ± 37 °° | 528 ± 70 ** | |
| 4 | 397 ± 25 | 422 ± 21 °° | 504 ± 40 ** | |
| 5 | 398 ± 24 | 423 ± 30 °°° | 505 ± 48 ** | 551 ± 65 ## |
| 6 | 400 ± 26 | 417 ± 23 °° | 518 ± 28 ** | 533 ± 30 |
| 7 | 403 ± 29 | 425 ± 29 °° | 507 ± 34 *** | 555 ± 44 ## |
| 8 | 405 ± 28 | 428 ± 36 °° | 503 ± 55 ** | 534 ± 62 ## |
| 9 | 406 ± 28 | 430 ± 29 °°° | 523 ± 54 ** | 559 ± 74 # |
All values are expressed as mean ± S.D. Paired t-test. °° p < 0.01, °°° p < 0.001 versus weight at TA; ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001 versus weight at T0; # p < 0.05, ## p < 0.01 versus weight at T1.
Figure 2Scans of transversal sections of L5 body from all animal groups (2–9). The encircled areas show, in the posterior portion of the vertebral body, the almost-total absence of trabecular bone. Scale bar: 1 mm.
Figure 3Micrographs of transverse sections of the anterolateral portion of L5 body from all animal groups under fluorescence microscope. In the bottom right image (outlined in red, as an example) the white dashed rectangle indicates the vertebral portion showed in all micrographs (2–9). Note on the surface of the few trabecular remnants (groups 3 and 4) the abundant red fluorescence. Note also, in the anterolateral cortex of the periosteal side (all groups), the presence of the three labels; in normal diet restoration only (groups from 5 to 8), the labels are well visible also on the endosteal side. Scale bar: 500 μm.
Figure 4Static and dynamic histomorphometric parameters of trabecular bone in L5 vertebral body sections. BV/TV: trabecular bone volume; Tb.Th: trabecular thickness; Tb.N: trabecular number; Tb.Sp: trabecular separation; Tb.MS/BS: trabecular mineralizing surface. All values are expressed as mean ± S.D. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by Bonferroni’s test: # p < 0.05, ## p < 0.01, ### p < 0.001 versus Group 2; ° p < 0.05, °° p < 0.01, °°° p < 0.001 versus Group 3; .§§ p < 0.01, §§§ p < 0.001 versus Group 4; * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001 versus Group 9.
Figure 5Static and dynamic histomorphometric parameters of cortical bone in L5 vertebral body sections. Ct.Th: cortical bone thickness; Ct.MAR: cortical mineral apposition rate. Values are expressed as mean ± S.D. ANOVA followed by Bonferroni’s test: ## p < 0.01, ### p < 0.001 versus Group 2; °° p < 0.01, °°° p < 0.001 versus Group 3; §§§ p < 0.001 versus Group 4; ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001 versus Group 9.
Figure 6Static and dynamic histomorphometric parameters of cortical bone in mid-diaphyseal femoral sections. Ct.B.Ar: cortical bone area; MS/BS: mineralizing surface; MAR: mineral apposition rate. Values are expressed as mean ± S.D. ANOVA followed by Bonferroni’s test. # p < 0.05, ## p < 0.01 versus Group 2; ° p < 0.05 versus Group 3; § p < 0.05, §§ p < 0.01 versus Group 4; * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01 versus Group 9.
Figure 7Details of femoral mid-diaphysis transversal sections of all animal groups under fluorescence microscope. In the bottom right image (outlined in red, as an example) the white dashed rectangle indicates the femur diaphysis portion showed in all micrographs (2–9). Note the presence of endosteal labels (arrows) in normal diet restoration groups (from 5 to 8). Scale bar: 250 μm.
Figure 8Scans of femoral distal metaphysis transversal sections of all animal groups (2–9). The encircled areas show rarefied bony trabeculae in the posterior portion of the femoral metaphyses. Scale bar: 1 mm.
Figure 9Static and dynamic histomorphometric parameters of trabecular bone in femoral distal metaphyseal sections. BV/TV: trabecular bone volume; Tb.Th: trabecular thickness; Tb.N: trabecular number; Tb.Sp: trabecular separation; Tb.MS/BS: trabecular mineralizing surface. Values are expressed as mean ± S.D. ANOVA followed by Bonferroni’s test. # p < 0.05, ## p < 0.01 versus Group 2; ° p < 0.05, °° p < 0.01, °°° p < 0.001 versus Group 3; § p < 0.05, §§ p < 0.01, §§§ p < 0.001 versus Group 4.
Figure 10Details of micrographs from femoral distal metaphysis transversal sections of all animal groups under fluorescence microscope. In the bottom right image outlined in red (as an example), the white dashed rectangle indicates the femur metaphysis portion showed in all micrographs (2–9). Note the abundant red fluorescence mostly on the surface of the few trabecular remnants of groups 3 and 4 (encircled areas). Scale bar: 1 mm.
Figure 11Static and dynamic histomorphometric parameters of cortical bone in femoral distal metaphyseal sections. Ct.B.Ar: cortical bone area; MAR: mineral apposition rate. Values are expressed as mean ± S.D. ANOVA followed by Bonferroni’s test.
Figure 12Sclerostin expression of osteocytes in the cortical bone of the anterolateral portion of the L4 vertebral body. The number (N) of stained osteocytes was related to the area (mm2) examined in each microscopic field. Values are expressed as mean ± S.D. ANOVA followed by Bonferroni’s test. ° p < 0.05 versus Group 3.
Mean values of serum levels at the end of each trial period: Ca, P, OPG, BALP, CrossLaps, and PTH (1-84).
| Group | Ca mg/dL | P mg/dL | OPG ng/mL | BALP ng/mL | Cross Laps ng/mL | PTH (1-84) pg/mL |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2 | 9.74 ± 0.28 | 6.65 ± 0.92 | 0.71 ± 0.04 | 6.90 ± 0.63 | 51.91 ± 19.16 | 54.52 ± 25.85 |
| 3 | 10.01 ± 0.16 | 7.35 ± 0.87 | 0.67 ± 0.10 | 6.84 ± 0.41 | 66.36 ± 17.20 | 78.88 ± 29.79 |
| 4 | 10.12 ± 0.28 | 7.04 ± 0.72 | 0.69 ± 0.05 | 6.63 ± 0.37 | 58.24 ± 20.88 | 62.41 ± 23.35 |
| 5 | 10.15 ± 0.27 | 5.89 ± 0.41 | 0.69 ± 0.07 | 6.51 ± 1.32 | 44.84 ± 11.86 | 58.41 ± 12.65 |
| 6 | 10.34 ± 0.24 | 6.10 ± 0.86 | 0.74 ± 0.10 | 6.97 ± 0.41 | 35.07 ± 4.55 | 80.76 ± 40.22 |
| 7 | 10.20 ± 0.16 | 6.18 ± 0.67 | 0.65 ± 0.06 | 6.41 ± 0.73 | 40.38 ± 22.07 | 112.99 ± 79.19 |
| 8 | 10.15 ± 0.19 | 6.12 ± 0.43 | 0.69 ± 0.04 | 6.69 ± 0.55 | 58.68 ± 42.44 | 72.05 ± 49.77 |
| 9 | 10.25 ± 0.30 | 7.10 ± 1.09 | 0.65 ± 0.03 | 6.07 ± 1.5 | 48.89 ± 15.66 | 63.35 ± 38.47 |
All values are expressed as mean ± S.D.