Literature DB >> 2268749

A comparison of iliac bone histomorphometric data in post-menopausal osteoporotic and normal subjects.

D B Kimmel1, R R Recker, J C Gallagher, A S Vaswani, J F Aloia.   

Abstract

Transilial bone biopsies following in vivo fluorochrome labeling were obtained from 90 women with postmenopausal osteoporosis and 34 healthy post-menopausal women. Standard histomorphometric data were collected from undecalcified sections. The distribution of values for both structural and remodelling indices was the same for each group. Bone volume was 35% lower (P less than 0.001), wall thickness was 12% lower (P less than 0.001), and trabecular thickness was 11% lower (P less than 0.02) in osteoporotics. Trabecular separation was 34% greater (P less than 0.001) and trabecular number was 36% lower (P less than 0.001) in osteoporotics. Biopsy core width was 11% less (P less than 0.02) and cortical width was 35-50% less (P less than 0.001) in osteoporotics. Static indices of remodelling, mineralizing surfaces, and mineral apposition rate were similar in the two groups. The absolute values for bone histomorphometric variables for both groups are similar to most published data. Osteoporotics had poorer bone structure, marked by decreased trabecular connectivity and thin cortices. There were no major differences in dynamic indices of remodelling. Since the histomorphometric data were distributed the same in both groups, special subsets of osteoporotic subjects not in the normal population did not exist.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2268749     DOI: 10.1016/0169-6009(90)90061-j

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bone Miner        ISSN: 0169-6009


  36 in total

1.  Dynamic bone quality: a noninvasive measure of bone's biomechanical property in osteoporosis.

Authors:  Amit Bhattacharya; Nelson B Watts; Kermit Davis; Susan Kotowski; Rakesh Shukla; Alok Kumar Dwivedi; Robert Coleman
Journal:  J Clin Densitom       Date:  2010-03-29       Impact factor: 2.617

2.  The effect of a short-term delay of puberty on trabecular bone mass and structure in female rats: a texture-based and histomorphometric analysis.

Authors:  Vanessa R Yingling; Yongqing Xiang; Theodore Raphan; Mitchell B Schaffler; Karen Koser; Rumena Malique
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2006-09-18       Impact factor: 4.398

Review 3.  The elusive concept of bone quality.

Authors:  Robert R Recker; M Janet Barger-Lux
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 5.096

4.  The remodeling transient and the calcium economy.

Authors:  J F Aloia; S Arunabh-Talwar; S Pollack; J K Yeh
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2008-01-26       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 5.  Issues in modern bone histomorphometry.

Authors:  R R Recker; D B Kimmel; D Dempster; R S Weinstein; T J Wronski; D B Burr
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2011-07-23       Impact factor: 4.398

6.  Denosumab in postmenopausal osteoporosis: what the clinician needs to know.

Authors:  E Michael Lewiecki
Journal:  Ther Adv Musculoskelet Dis       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 5.346

Review 7.  Animal models for fracture treatment in osteoporosis.

Authors:  Marcus Egermann; J Goldhahn; E Schneider
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2005-03-05       Impact factor: 4.507

8.  Increased cancellous bone in the femoral neck of patients with coxarthrosis (hip osteoarthritis): a positive remodeling imbalance favoring bone formation.

Authors:  G R Jordan; N Loveridge; J Power; M T Clarke; J Reeve
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2003-03-05       Impact factor: 4.507

9.  Bisphosphonates for the treatment of osteoporosis: insights for clinicians.

Authors:  E Michael Lewiecki
Journal:  Ther Adv Chronic Dis       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 5.091

10.  Bone microarchitecture and stiffness in premenopausal women with idiopathic osteoporosis.

Authors:  Adi Cohen; X Sherry Liu; Emily M Stein; Donald J McMahon; Halley F Rogers; Jeanette Lemaster; Robert R Recker; Joan M Lappe; X Edward Guo; Elizabeth Shane
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2009-10-16       Impact factor: 5.958

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.