Sujit Sheth1, Christopher J Allen2, David E Farrell3, John H Tripp3, Ramin Jafari4, Yi Wang5, Gary M Brittenham6. 1. Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA. 2. Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY, USA. 3. Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA. 4. Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA. 5. Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA; Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA. 6. Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY, USA. Electronic address: gmb31@columbia.edu.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To compare measurement of the liver iron concentration in patients with transfusional iron overload by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), using R2*, and by magnetic susceptometry, using a new high-transitiontemperature (high-Tc; operating at 77 K, cooled by liquid nitrogen) superconducting magnetic susceptometer. METHODS: In 28 patients with transfusional iron overload, 43 measurements of the liver iron concentration were made by both R2* and high-Tc magnetic susceptometry. RESULTS: Measurements of the liver iron concentration by R2* and high-Tc magnetic susceptometry were significantly correlated when comparing all patients (Pearson's r = 0.91, p < 0.0001) and those with results by susceptometry >7 mg Fe/g liver, dry weight (r = 0.93, p = 0.006). In lower ranges of liver iron, no significant correlations between the two methods were found (0 to <3.2 mg Fe/g liver, dry weight: r = 0.2, p = 0.37; 3.2 to 7 mg Fe/g liver, dry weight: r = 0.41; p = 0.14). CONCLUSION: The lack of linear correlation between R2* and magnetic susceptibility measurements of the liver iron concentration with minimal or modest iron overload may be due to the effects of fibrosis and other cellular pathology that interfere with R2* but do not appreciably alter magnetic susceptibility.
PURPOSE: To compare measurement of the liver iron concentration in patients with transfusional iron overload by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), using R2*, and by magnetic susceptometry, using a new high-transitiontemperature (high-Tc; operating at 77 K, cooled by liquid nitrogen) superconducting magnetic susceptometer. METHODS: In 28 patients with transfusional iron overload, 43 measurements of the liver iron concentration were made by both R2* and high-Tc magnetic susceptometry. RESULTS: Measurements of the liver iron concentration by R2* and high-Tc magnetic susceptometry were significantly correlated when comparing all patients (Pearson's r = 0.91, p < 0.0001) and those with results by susceptometry >7 mg Fe/g liver, dry weight (r = 0.93, p = 0.006). In lower ranges of liver iron, no significant correlations between the two methods were found (0 to <3.2 mg Fe/g liver, dry weight: r = 0.2, p = 0.37; 3.2 to 7 mg Fe/g liver, dry weight: r = 0.41; p = 0.14). CONCLUSION: The lack of linear correlation between R2* and magnetic susceptibility measurements of the liver iron concentration with minimal or modest iron overload may be due to the effects of fibrosis and other cellular pathology that interfere with R2* but do not appreciably alter magnetic susceptibility.
Keywords:
High-transition-temperature superconductors; Liver iron concentration; MRI; Magnetic susceptometry; R2*; Superconducting transition temperature
Authors: Timothy G St Pierre; Paul R Clark; Wanida Chua-anusorn; Adam J Fleming; Gary P Jeffrey; John K Olynyk; Pensri Pootrakul; Erin Robins; Robert Lindeman Journal: Blood Date: 2004-07-15 Impact factor: 22.113
Authors: John C Wood; Cathleen Enriquez; Nilesh Ghugre; J Michael Tyzka; Susan Carson; Marvin D Nelson; Thomas D Coates Journal: Blood Date: 2005-04-28 Impact factor: 22.113
Authors: Jane S Hankins; M Beth McCarville; Ralf B Loeffler; Matthew P Smeltzer; Mihaela Onciu; Fredric A Hoffer; Chin-Shang Li; Winfred C Wang; Russell E Ware; Claudia M Hillenbrand Journal: Blood Date: 2009-03-04 Impact factor: 22.113
Authors: Peter D Jensen; Asbjørn H Nielsen; Carsten W Simonsen; Kenneth K Jensen; Martin Bøgsted; Anne B H Jensen; Benedict Kjaergaard Journal: MAGMA Date: 2022-01-17 Impact factor: 2.533