Literature DB >> 19141120

MRI assessment of liver iron content in thalassamic patients with three different protocols: comparisons and correlations.

Athanasios Christoforidis1, Vassilios Perifanis, George Spanos, Efthimia Vlachaki, Marina Economou, Ioanna Tsatra, Miranda Athanassiou-Metaxa.   

Abstract

Our aim was to assess liver iron content, in thalassaemic patients, by using three different MR protocols and compare their data. Ninety-four thalassaemic patients (44 M and 50 F, mean age 25.82 +/- 8.3 yrs), were enrolled in the study. In each patient, three measurements of the liver iron content were performed, with the use of a single imager, equipped with a 1.5 Tesla magnet. Liver R2* was measured on gradient-echo sequence. Calculation of MR-HIC values was based on an algorithm using liver to muscle (L/M) ratios in five axial gradient-echo sequences. Finally, determination of liver R2 employed a 16-echo, spin-echo pulse sequence. Additionally, myocardial R2* value was determined for each patient. Results showed that all three magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) methods were highly correlated to each other and significantly correlated to serum ferritin concentrations. Liver R2 method showed an increased sensitivity in detecting liver iron contents in the upper range. No correlation occurred between each liver MRI parameter and myocardial R2* values. Finally, we managed to provide formulae for equating values obtaining with any of these three MRI methods.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19141120     DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0609.2009.01223.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Haematol        ISSN: 0902-4441            Impact factor:   2.997


  20 in total

Review 1.  Magnetic resonance imaging quantification of liver iron.

Authors:  Claude B Sirlin; Scott B Reeder
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 2.266

2.  Liver iron concentration quantification by MRI: are recommended protocols accurate enough for clinical practice?

Authors:  Agustin Castiella; Jose M Alústiza; Jose I Emparanza; Eva Ma Zapata; Belen Costero; Maria I Díez
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2010-08-06       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  Comparison of whole liver and small region-of-interest measurements of MRI liver R2* in children with iron overload.

Authors:  M Beth McCarville; Claudia M Hillenbrand; Ralf B Loeffler; Matthew P Smeltzer; Ruitan Song; Chin-Shang Li; Jane S Hankins
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2010-03-24

Review 4.  Liver iron content determination by magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Konstantinos Tziomalos; Vassilios Perifanis
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2010-04-07       Impact factor: 5.742

5.  Assessment of MR-based R2* and quantitative susceptibility mapping for the quantification of liver iron concentration in a mouse model at 7T.

Authors:  Gregory Simchick; Zhi Liu; Tamas Nagy; May Xiong; Qun Zhao
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2018-03-25       Impact factor: 4.668

6.  New developments and controversies in iron metabolism and iron chelation therapy.

Authors:  Christina N Kontoghiorghe; George J Kontoghiorghes
Journal:  World J Methodol       Date:  2016-03-26

Review 7.  Quantification of liver iron with MRI: state of the art and remaining challenges.

Authors:  Diego Hernando; Yakir S Levin; Claude B Sirlin; Scott B Reeder
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2014-03-03       Impact factor: 4.813

8.  Safety and efficacy of iron chelation therapy with deferiprone in patients with transfusion-dependent thalassemia.

Authors:  Saumya S Jamuar; Angeline H M Lai
Journal:  Ther Adv Hematol       Date:  2012-10

9.  Gradient-echo magnetic resonance imaging study of pancreatic iron overload in young Egyptian beta-thalassemia major patients and effect of splenectomy.

Authors:  Randa M Matter; Khalid E Allam; Amany M Sadony
Journal:  Diabetol Metab Syndr       Date:  2010-04-15       Impact factor: 3.320

10.  Does fat suppression via chemically selective saturation affect R2*-MRI for transfusional iron overload assessment? A clinical evaluation at 1.5T and 3T.

Authors:  Axel J Krafft; Ralf B Loeffler; Ruitian Song; Xiao Bian; M Beth McCarville; Jane S Hankins; Claudia M Hillenbrand
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2015-08-26       Impact factor: 4.668

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.