Literature DB >> 30746642

Prompting Patients with Poorly Controlled Diabetes to Identify Visit Priorities Before Primary Care Visits: a Pragmatic Cluster Randomized Trial.

Michelle T Vo1, Connie S Uratsu1, Karen R Estacio1, Andrea Altschuler1, Eileen Kim2, Stacey E Alexeeff1, Alyce S Adams1, Julie A Schmittdiel1, Michele Heisler3,4, Richard W Grant5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Most patients with diabetes do not meet all evidence-based goals of care, and many patients report poor communication and lack of involvement in decision-making during primary care visits.
OBJECTIVE: To test the hypothesis that a "Pre-Visit Prioritization" secure email message could improve visit communication and glycemic control among patients with type 2 diabetes.
DESIGN: We conducted a pragmatic, provider-randomized, multi-site clinical trial from March 2015 to October 2016 across 30 primary care practices within Kaiser Permanente Northern California (KPNC), a large integrated care delivery system. PARTICIPANTS: Eligible patients had at least 1 year of KPNC membership, type 2 diabetes with most recently measured hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) > = 8.0%, and were registered users of the KPNC online patient portal.
INTERVENTIONS: Patients in the intervention arm, upon booking an appointment, received a secure email through the KPNC online portal with a link to the EHR allowing them to submit their top one or two priorities prior to the visit. Control patients received usual care. MAIN MEASURES: Glycemic control; change in HbA1c 6 and 12 months after the initial visit; patient-reported outcomes related to patient-provider communication and patient care experiences. KEY
RESULTS: During the study period, 1276 patients had at least one eligible visit. In post-visit surveys (n = 457), more intervention arm patients reported preparing questions for their visit (72% vs 63%, p = 0.048) and being given treatment choices to consider (81% vs 73%, p = 0.041). Patients in both arms had similar reductions in HbA1c over the 12-month study period (0.56% ± 1.45%), with no significant differences between arms.
CONCLUSIONS: A "light touch" email-based pre-visit intervention resulted in improved measures of visit interaction but did not significantly improve glycemic control relative to usual care. Improving diabetes clinical outcomes through more effective primary care visits may require more intensive approaches to patient visit preparation. TRIAL REGISTRY: NCT02375932.

Entities:  

Keywords:  clinical trials; diabetes; doctor-patient relationships; health information technology; primary care

Year:  2019        PMID: 30746642      PMCID: PMC6544732          DOI: 10.1007/s11606-018-4756-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gen Intern Med        ISSN: 0884-8734            Impact factor:   5.128


  35 in total

1.  Psychometric properties of the Consumer Assessment of Health Plans Study (CAHPS) 2.0 adult core survey.

Authors:  J Lee Hargraves; Ron D Hays; Paul D Cleary
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 3.402

2.  Practical clinical trials: increasing the value of clinical research for decision making in clinical and health policy.

Authors:  Sean R Tunis; Daniel B Stryer; Carolyn M Clancy
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2003-09-24       Impact factor: 56.272

3.  Communicating with physicians about medical decisions: a reluctance to disagree.

Authors:  Jared R Adams; Glyn Elwyn; France Légaré; Dominick L Frosch
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2012-08-13

4.  A pragmatic-explanatory continuum indicator summary (PRECIS): a tool to help trial designers.

Authors:  Kevin E Thorpe; Merrick Zwarenstein; Andrew D Oxman; Shaun Treweek; Curt D Furberg; Douglas G Altman; Sean Tunis; Eduardo Bergel; Ian Harvey; David J Magid; Kalipso Chalkidou
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 6.437

5.  Trends in the evidence level for the American Diabetes Association's "Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes" from 2005 to 2014.

Authors:  Richard W Grant; M Sue Kirkman
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 19.112

6.  Patients' unvoiced agendas in general practice consultations: qualitative study.

Authors:  C A Barry; C P Bradley; N Britten; F A Stevenson; N Barber
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2000-05-06

7.  Encounters by patients with type 2 diabetes--complex and demanding: an observational study.

Authors:  Michael L Parchman; Raquel L Romero; Jacqueline A Pugh
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2006 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 5.166

8.  Time allocation in primary care office visits.

Authors:  Ming Tai-Seale; Thomas G McGuire; Weimin Zhang
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 3.402

9.  Little time for diabetes management in the primary care setting.

Authors:  Catherine S Barnes; David C Ziemer; Chris D Miller; Joyce P Doyle; Clyde Watkins; Curtiss B Cook; Dan L Gallina; Imad el-Kebbi; William T Branch; Lawrence S Phillips
Journal:  Diabetes Educ       Date:  2004 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.140

10.  Perceived efficacy in patient-physician interactions (PEPPI): validation of an instrument in older persons.

Authors:  R C Maly; J C Frank; G N Marshall; M R DiMatteo; D B Reuben
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 5.562

View more
  6 in total

1.  From the Editors' Desk: Why Does Not Improvement in Communication Lead to Improvement in "Hard" Outcomes?

Authors:  Jeffrey L Jackson
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 5.128

2.  Patient and supporter factors affecting engagement with diabetes telehealth.

Authors:  Margaret F Zupa; John D Piette; Shelley C Stoll; D Scott Obrosky; Monique Boudreaux-Kelly; Ada O Youk; Luc Overholt; Ranak Trivedi; Michele Heisler; Ann-Marie Rosland
Journal:  Am J Manag Care       Date:  2021-10       Impact factor: 2.229

3.  Visit Content Analysis: Doctor-Patient Communication in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes.

Authors:  Dana A Abdelgadir; Laurie M Rodriguez; Maruta A Blatchins; Pranita Mishra; Anjali Gopalan; Richard W Grant
Journal:  Perm J       Date:  2021-05

4.  Applied techniques for putting pre-visit planning in clinical practice to empower patient-centered care in the pandemic era: a systematic review and framework suggestion.

Authors:  Marsa Gholamzadeh; Hamidreza Abtahi; Marjan Ghazisaeeidi
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2021-05-13       Impact factor: 2.655

5.  Learning health systems using data to drive healthcare improvement and impact: a systematic review.

Authors:  Joanne Enticott; Alison Johnson; Helena Teede
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2021-03-05       Impact factor: 2.655

6.  Establishing priorities for diabetes action goals according to key opinion leaders and health professionals.

Authors:  Dana Zelnik Yovel; Orly Tamir; Elza Lavon; Tanya Kolobov; Anat Bel-Ange; Michal Julius; Itamar Raz; Micha Rapoport
Journal:  Isr J Health Policy Res       Date:  2022-08-19
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.