Ming Tai-Seale1, Thomas G McGuire, Weimin Zhang. 1. Department of Health Policy and Management, School of Rural Public Health, 1266 TAMU, College Station, TX 77843-1266, USA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To use an innovative videotape analysis method to examine how clinic time was spent during elderly patients' visits to primary care physicians. Secondary objectives were to identify the factors that influence time allocations. DATA SOURCES: A convenience sample of 392 videotapes of routine office visits conducted between 1998 and 2000 from multiple primary care practices in the United States, supplemented by patient and physician surveys. RESEARCH DESIGN: Videotaped visits were examined for visit length and time devoted to specific topics--a novel approach to study time allocation. A survival analysis model analyzed the effects of patient, physician, and physician practice setting on how clinic time was spent. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Very limited amount of time was dedicated to specific topics in office visits. The median visit length was 15.7 minutes covering a median of six topics. About 5 minutes were spent on the longest topic whereas the remaining topics each received 1.1 minutes. While time spent by patient and physician on a topic responded to many factors, length of the visit overall varied little even when contents of visits varied widely. Macro factors associated with each site had more influence on visit and topic length than the nature of the problem patients presented. CONCLUSIONS: Many topics compete for visit time, resulting in small amount of time being spent on each topic. A highly regimented schedule might interfere with having sufficient time for patients with complex or multiple problems. Efforts to improve the quality of care need to recognize the time pressure on both patients and physicians, the effects of financial incentives, and the time costs of improving patient-physician interactions.
OBJECTIVES: To use an innovative videotape analysis method to examine how clinic time was spent during elderly patients' visits to primary care physicians. Secondary objectives were to identify the factors that influence time allocations. DATA SOURCES: A convenience sample of 392 videotapes of routine office visits conducted between 1998 and 2000 from multiple primary care practices in the United States, supplemented by patient and physician surveys. RESEARCH DESIGN: Videotaped visits were examined for visit length and time devoted to specific topics--a novel approach to study time allocation. A survival analysis model analyzed the effects of patient, physician, and physician practice setting on how clinic time was spent. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Very limited amount of time was dedicated to specific topics in office visits. The median visit length was 15.7 minutes covering a median of six topics. About 5 minutes were spent on the longest topic whereas the remaining topics each received 1.1 minutes. While time spent by patient and physician on a topic responded to many factors, length of the visit overall varied little even when contents of visits varied widely. Macro factors associated with each site had more influence on visit and topic length than the nature of the problem patients presented. CONCLUSIONS: Many topics compete for visit time, resulting in small amount of time being spent on each topic. A highly regimented schedule might interfere with having sufficient time for patients with complex or multiple problems. Efforts to improve the quality of care need to recognize the time pressure on both patients and physicians, the effects of financial incentives, and the time costs of improving patient-physician interactions.
Authors: Ming Tai-Seale; Rachel Bramson; David Drukker; Margo-Lea Hurwicz; Marcia Ory; Thomas Tai-Seale; Richard Street; Mary Ann Cook Journal: Med Care Date: 2005-12 Impact factor: 2.983
Authors: Lillian C Min; David B Reuben; Catherine H MacLean; Paul G Shekelle; David H Solomon; Takahiro Higashi; John T Chang; Carol P Roth; Caren J Kamberg; John Adams; Roy T Young; Neil S Wenger Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2005-10 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: Kevin Fiscella; Sean Meldrum; Peter Franks; Cleveland G Shields; Paul Duberstein; Susan H McDaniel; Ronald M Epstein Journal: Med Care Date: 2004-11 Impact factor: 2.983
Authors: Linda Boise; Elizabeth Eckstrom; Lyle Fagnan; Anne King; Monica Goubaud; David I Buckley; Cynthia Morris Journal: J Am Board Fam Med Date: 2010 Jul-Aug Impact factor: 2.657
Authors: G Talley Holman; John W Beasley; Ben-Tzion Karsh; Jamie A Stone; Paul D Smith; Tosha B Wetterneck Journal: J Am Med Inform Assoc Date: 2015-09-02 Impact factor: 4.497
Authors: Richard K Zimmerman; Mary Patricia Nowalk; Melissa Tabbarah; Jonathan A Hart; Dwight E Fox; Mahlon Raymund Journal: Ann Fam Med Date: 2009 Nov-Dec Impact factor: 5.166