| Literature DB >> 30746477 |
Amay J Bandodkar1,2, Philipp Gutruf1,2,3, Jungil Choi1,2, KunHyuck Lee1, Yurina Sekine4, Jonathan T Reeder1,2, William J Jeang1,2, Alexander J Aranyosi2,5, Stephen P Lee2,5, Jeffrey B Model2,5, Roozbeh Ghaffari2,5,6, Chun-Ju Su1, John P Leshock6, Tyler Ray1,2, Anthony Verrillo1, Kyle Thomas7, Vaishnavi Krishnamurthi8, Seungyong Han9, Jeonghyun Kim10, Siddharth Krishnan1,11,12, Tao Hang13, John A Rogers1,2,5,10,11,14,15,16,17,18.
Abstract
Wearable sweat sensors rely either on electronics for electrochemical detection or on colorimetry for visual readout. Non-ideal form factors represent disadvantages of the former, while semiquantitative operation and narrow scope of measurable biomarkers characterize the latter. Here, we introduce a battery-free, wireless electronic sensing platform inspired by biofuel cells that integrates chronometric microfluidic platforms with embedded colorimetric assays. The resulting sensors combine advantages of electronic and microfluidic functionality in a platform that is significantly lighter, cheaper, and smaller than alternatives. A demonstration device simultaneously monitors sweat rate/loss, pH, lactate, glucose, and chloride. Systematic studies of the electronics, microfluidics, and integration schemes establish the key design considerations and performance attributes. Two-day human trials that compare concentrations of glucose and lactate in sweat and blood suggest a potential basis for noninvasive, semi-quantitative tracking of physiological status.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 30746477 PMCID: PMC6357758 DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.aav3294
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Adv ISSN: 2375-2548 Impact factor: 14.136
Fig. 1Device concept.
(A) Schematic illustrating the exploded view of the complete hybrid battery-free system. PI, polyimide; S.R., sweat rate. Close-up image of (B) microfluidic patch with embedded sensors and (C) battery-free NFC electronics. (D) Image illustrating the reversible magnetic attachment of the NFC electronics to the microfluidic patch. (E) Image of the complete system. (F) Image illustrating the device during sweating. (G) A phone interface that illustrates wireless communication and image acquisition. Photo credit: Philipp Gutruf, Northwestern University.
Fig. 2Electrical characterization of the NFC electronics.
(A) Simplified schematic illustration of electrochemical sensor readout. ADC, analog-to-digital converter. (B) Image illustrating the device bent at decreasing radii. (C) I-V measurements of shorted sensors recoded with decreasing curvature radii. (D) Phase response measurements of NFC electronics with decreasing radii. (E) I-V measurements of shorted sensors with repeated attachment and detachment of the electronics to the microfluidics. (F) Effect of bending on the impedance of magnetic contacts over a wide range of frequencies. Effect of (G) distance and (H) angle between NFC reader and device on signal recording (n = 3). Photo credit: Philipp Gutruf, Northwestern University.
Fig. 3Lactate sensor characterization.
(A) Exploded-view schematic illustration of the layer makeup of the biofuel cell–based lactate sensor. LOx, lactate oxidase; TTF, tetrathiafulvalene. (B) Image of the lactate sensor. (C) Real-time sensor response to increasing lactate concentration in phosphate buffer (pH 7.0) at 25°C and (D) the corresponding calibration (n = 3). (E) Plot illustrating a reversible response for the lactate sensor for four consecutive cycles of varying lactate concentration. Inset shows calibration plot that compares the sensor signal in (E) for the four cycles. V, voltage in millivolts; C, concentration in millimolar. (F) Real-time data acquired with increasing lactate concentration in artificial sweat under common physiological sweat conditions [temperature, ~30°C (pH 5.5)]. (G) Calibration plot obtained from lactate sensors at ~30°C in artificial sweat with different pH (n = 3). Photo credit: Philipp Gutruf, Northwestern University.
Fig. 4Glucose sensor characterization.
(A) Exploded-view schematic illustration of the layer makeup of the biofuel cell–based glucose sensor. GOx, glucose oxidase; PtC, platinized carbon. (B) Image of the glucose sensor. (C) Real-time sensor response to increasing glucose concentration in phosphate buffer (pH 7.0) at 25°C and (D) the corresponding calibration (n = 3). (E) Plot illustrating the reversible response of the glucose sensor for four consecutive cycles of varying glucose concentration. V, voltage in millivolts; C, concentration in micromolar. Inset shows calibration plot comparing the sensor signal plotted in (E) for the four cycles. (F) Real-time data acquired with increasing glucose concentration in artificial sweat under common physiological sweat conditions [temperature, ~30°C (pH 5.5)]. (G) Calibration plot obtained from glucose sensors at ~30°C in artificial sweat with different pH (n = 3). Photo credit: Philipp Gutruf, Northwestern University.
Fig. 5Colorimetric assay characterization.
Calibration and corresponding color evolution for physiologically relevant levels of (A) chloride (n = 3) and (B) pH (n = 3). (C) Filling of sweat rate sensor. The arrow indications the direction of filling. (D) Image illustrating the chrono-sampling feature of the microfluidic system. Photo credit: Jungil Choi and Jonathan Reeder, Northwestern University.
Fig. 6Human trials.
(A) Photograph of a subject wearing a wireless battery-free hybrid sensor system. (B) Reading distance with a large NFC antenna. (C) Image of complete system captured after a bout of cycling by subject #1. Real-time wirelessly acquired sweat concentration levels for (D) lactate and (E) glucose, respectively. (F) Image of complete system captured after a bout of cycling by subject #2. Real-time wirelessly acquired sweat concentration levels for (G) lactate and (H) glucose, respectively. (D, E, G, and H) Blue and green regions represent conditions before and after collection of sweat, respectively. Photo credit: Philipp Gutruf, Northwestern University.
Fig. 7Human trails.
Correlation of data acquired from biofuel cell–based glucose and lactate sweat sensors with that acquired from blood glucose and lactate meters, respectively, over a period of (A) 2 days and (B) 1 day for subject #1 (with time lag compensation). Photo credit: Philipp Gutruf, Northwestern University.