Travis M Dumont1, Robert W Bina1. 1. Department of Surgery, Division of Neurosurgery, University of Arizona - Tucson.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Thrombectomy has become established as a successful treatment strategy for ischemic stroke, and consequently, more patients are undergoing this procedure. Due to comorbid conditions, chronic disease states, and advanced age, many patients have anatomy which complicates revascularization, specifically difficult aortic arch anatomy, or tortuous common and internal artery anatomy, or both. METHODS: In the present study, these unfavorable anatomic parameters were analyzed for 53 patients undergoing acute thrombectomy for ischemic stroke. Statistical analysis was performed and the outcome TICI scores were compared. 26 of the patients analyzed had features of difficult femoral access. RESULTS: Difficult arch anatomy was associated with unsuccessful revascularization (p = 0.03, Fisher's exact) with only 53% of patients with this feature having favorable TICI scores. Difficult common carotid access was also associated with unsuccessful revascularization (p = 0.004, Fisher's exact) with 38% success. There was a trend toward significance for unsuccessful revascularization for difficult internal carotid artery access (p = 0.06, Fisher's exact). CONCLUSION: Any combination of the aforementioned anatomic parameters was associated with the decreased success of treatment which was an independent predictor in multivariate analysis (p = 0.009). As difficult access anatomy is commonly encountered in patients undergoing emergent thrombectomy, it is important for the treating physician to be prepared and to adapt access strategies to increase the likelihood of successful revascularization.
BACKGROUND: Thrombectomy has become established as a successful treatment strategy for ischemic stroke, and consequently, more patients are undergoing this procedure. Due to comorbid conditions, chronic disease states, and advanced age, many patients have anatomy which complicates revascularization, specifically difficult aortic arch anatomy, or tortuous common and internal artery anatomy, or both. METHODS: In the present study, these unfavorable anatomic parameters were analyzed for 53 patients undergoing acute thrombectomy for ischemic stroke. Statistical analysis was performed and the outcome TICI scores were compared. 26 of the patients analyzed had features of difficult femoral access. RESULTS: Difficult arch anatomy was associated with unsuccessful revascularization (p = 0.03, Fisher's exact) with only 53% of patients with this feature having favorable TICI scores. Difficult common carotid access was also associated with unsuccessful revascularization (p = 0.004, Fisher's exact) with 38% success. There was a trend toward significance for unsuccessful revascularization for difficult internal carotid artery access (p = 0.06, Fisher's exact). CONCLUSION: Any combination of the aforementioned anatomic parameters was associated with the decreased success of treatment which was an independent predictor in multivariate analysis (p = 0.009). As difficult access anatomy is commonly encountered in patients undergoing emergent thrombectomy, it is important for the treating physician to be prepared and to adapt access strategies to increase the likelihood of successful revascularization.
Authors: Kilian M Treurniet; Albert J Yoo; Olvert A Berkhemer; Hester F Lingsma; Anna M M Boers; Puck S S Fransen; Debbie Beumer; Lucie A van den Berg; Marieke E S Sprengers; Sjoerd F M Jenniskens; Geert J Lycklama À Nijeholt; Marianne A A van Walderveen; Joseph C J Bot; Ludo F M Beenen; René van den Berg; Wim H van Zwam; Aad van der Lugt; Robert J van Oostenbrugge; Diederik W J Dippel; Yvo B W E M Roos; Henk A Marquering; Charles B L M Majoie Journal: Stroke Date: 2016-11-08 Impact factor: 7.914
Authors: Francisco Hernández-Fernández; Laura Rojas-Bartolomé; Jorge García-García; Óscar Ayo-Martín; Juan David Molina-Nuevo; Rosa Angélica Barbella-Aponte; Gemma Serrano-Heras; Enrique Juliá-Molla; María José Pedrosa-Jiménez; Tomás Segura Journal: Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol Date: 2017-06-06 Impact factor: 2.740
Authors: Johnny H Y Wong; Huy M Do; Nicholas A Telischak; Adrienne M Moraff; Robert L Dodd; Michael P Marks; Shreya M Ingle; Jeremy J Heit Journal: J Neurointerv Surg Date: 2016-10-27 Impact factor: 5.836
Authors: Volker Puetz; Imanuel Dzialowski; Michael D Hill; Suresh Subramaniam; P N Sylaja; Andrea Krol; Christine O'Reilly; Mark E Hudon; William Y Hu; Shelagh B Coutts; Philip A Barber; Timothy Watson; Jayanta Roy; Andrew M Demchuk Journal: Int J Stroke Date: 2008-11 Impact factor: 5.266
Authors: Randall T Higashida; Anthony J Furlan; Heidi Roberts; Thomas Tomsick; Buddy Connors; John Barr; William Dillon; Steven Warach; Joseph Broderick; Barbara Tilley; David Sacks Journal: Stroke Date: 2003-07-17 Impact factor: 7.914
Authors: Travis M Dumont; Maxim Mokin; Michael M Wach; Patrick S Drummond; Adnan H Siddiqui; Elad I Levy; L Nelson Hopkins Journal: J Neurointerv Surg Date: 2013-05-17 Impact factor: 5.836
Authors: Andrew A Fanous; Sabareesh K Natarajan; Patrick K Jowdy; Travis M Dumont; Maxim Mokin; Jihnhee Yu; Adam Goldstein; Michael M Wach; James L Budny; L Nelson Hopkins; Kenneth V Snyder; Adnan H Siddiqui; Elad I Levy Journal: Neurosurgery Date: 2015-10 Impact factor: 4.654
Authors: Maxim Mokin; Simon Morr; Sabareesh K Natarajan; Ning Lin; Kenneth V Snyder; L Nelson Hopkins; Adnan H Siddiqui; Elad I Levy Journal: J Neurointerv Surg Date: 2014-02-07 Impact factor: 5.836
Authors: Ghislaine Holswilder; Maaike Pme Stuart; Tine Dompeling; Nyika D Kruyt; Jelle J Goeman; Aad van der Lugt; Wouter J Schonewille; Geert J Lycklama À Nijeholt; Charles Blm Majoie; Lonneke Sf Yo; Frederick Ja Meijer; Henk A Marquering; Marieke Jh Wermer; Marianne Aa van Walderveen Journal: Eur Stroke J Date: 2022-02-08