Literature DB >> 26308641

High-Risk Factors in Symptomatic Patients Undergoing Carotid Artery Stenting With Distal Protection: Buffalo Risk Assessment Scale (BRASS).

Andrew A Fanous1, Sabareesh K Natarajan, Patrick K Jowdy, Travis M Dumont, Maxim Mokin, Jihnhee Yu, Adam Goldstein, Michael M Wach, James L Budny, L Nelson Hopkins, Kenneth V Snyder, Adnan H Siddiqui, Elad I Levy.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Demographics and vascular anatomy may play an important role in predicting periprocedural complications in symptomatic patients undergoing carotid artery stenting (CAS).
OBJECTIVE: To predict factors associated with increased risk of complications in symptomatic patients undergoing CAS and to devise a CAS scoring system that predicts such complications in this patient population.
METHODS: A retrospective study was conducted that included patients who underwent CAS for symptomatic carotid stenosis during a 3-year period. Demographics and anatomic characteristics were subsequently correlated with 30-day outcome measures.
RESULTS: A total of 221 patients were included in the study. The cumulative rate of periprocedural complications was 7.2%, including stroke (3.2%), myocardial infarction (3.2%), and death (1.4%). Renal disease increased the risk of all complications. National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score ≥10 at presentation, difficult femoral access, and diseased calcified aortic arch increased the risk of stroke and all complications. Type III aortic arch correlated with increased risk of stroke. Pseudo-occlusion and concentric calcification of the carotid artery increased the risk of myocardial infarction, death, and all complications. Carotid tortuosity and anatomy hostile to the deployment of distal protection devices increased the risk of stroke, myocardial infarction, death, and all complications.
CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that CAS should be avoided in patients with multiple anatomic risk factors. High presenting National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score and renal disease also increase the complication risk. The CAS scoring system devised here is simple, reproducible, and clinically valuable in predicting complications risk in symptomatic patients undergoing CAS.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26308641     DOI: 10.1227/NEU.0000000000000871

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurosurgery        ISSN: 0148-396X            Impact factor:   4.654


  10 in total

1.  External Validation of Risk Prediction Models to Improve Selection of Patients for Carotid Endarterectomy.

Authors:  Michiel H F Poorthuis; Reinier A R Herings; Kirsten Dansey; Johanna A A Damen; Jacoba P Greving; Marc L Schermerhorn; Gert J de Borst
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2021-10-12       Impact factor: 7.914

2.  Difficult Vascular Access Anatomy Associated with Decreased Success of Revascularization in Emergent Thrombectomy.

Authors:  Travis M Dumont; Robert W Bina
Journal:  J Vasc Interv Neurol       Date:  2018-11

3.  Endovascular Stenting of Tandem Carotid Artery Origin and Bifurcation Stenotic Lesions Using Flow Reversal.

Authors:  Andrew A Fanous; Parham Yashar; Ashish Sonig; Amanda Zakeri; Kenneth V Snyder; Elad I Levy; Jason M Davies; Adnan H Siddiqui
Journal:  J Vasc Interv Neurol       Date:  2017-10

Review 4.  Recent Trends in Neuro-endovascular Treatment for Acute Ischemic Stroke, Cerebral Aneurysms, Carotid Stenosis, and Brain Arteriovenous Malformations.

Authors:  Yuji Matsumaru; Eiichi Ishikawa; Tetsuya Yamamoto; Akira Matsumura
Journal:  Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo)       Date:  2017-05-01       Impact factor: 1.742

5.  Treatment Strategy Based on Plaque Vulnerability and the Treatment Risk Evaluation for Internal Carotid Artery Stenosis.

Authors:  Yoshiro Ito; Wataro Tsuruta; Yasunobu Nakai; Tomoji Takigawa; Aiki Marushima; Tomohiko Masumoto; Yuji Matsumaru; Eiichi Ishikawa; Akira Matsumura
Journal:  Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo)       Date:  2018-03-03       Impact factor: 1.742

6.  Risk Factors of Contralateral Microembolic Infarctions Related to Carotid Artery Stenting.

Authors:  Hidemichi Ito; Masashi Uchida; Taigen Sase; Yuichiro Kushiro; Daisuke Wakui; Hidetaka Onodera; Hiroshi Takasuna; Hiroyuki Morishima; Kotaro Oshio; Yuichiro Tanaka
Journal:  Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo)       Date:  2018-06-11       Impact factor: 1.742

7.  Dual Energy Computed Tomography of Internal Carotid Artery: A Modified Dual-Energy Algorithm for Calcified Plaque Removal, Compared With Digital Subtraction Angiography.

Authors:  Hongying Qu; Yongan Gao; Meiling Li; Shuo Zhai; Miao Zhang; Jie Lu
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2021-02-04       Impact factor: 4.003

8.  Protected carotid artery stenting in patients with severe stenosis.

Authors:  Seo-Young Jeon; Jong-Myong Lee
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2022-08-19       Impact factor: 1.817

9.  Calcification in original plaque and restenosis following carotid artery stenting.

Authors:  Hiroyuki Katano; Yusuke Nishikawa; Hiroshi Yamada; Mitsuhito Mase
Journal:  Surg Neurol Int       Date:  2017-11-20

10.  Prediction models for clinical outcome after a carotid revascularisation procedure: A systematic review.

Authors:  Eline J Volkers; Ale Algra; L Jaap Kappelle; Jacoba P Greving
Journal:  Eur Stroke J       Date:  2017-10-24
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.