Poonam Rao1, Jiangtao Liu2, Matthew L Springer1,2,3. 1. Division of Cardiology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California. 2. Cardiovascular Research Institute, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California. 3. Center for Tobacco Control Research and Education, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: JUUL and earlier generation electronic cigarettes (e-cigs) are promoted as being less hazardous than cigarettes. While JUUL Labs, in particular, claims that switching from smoking to vaping has beneficial impacts, the health effects of such products are not well understood. We investigated whether exposure to JUUL and previous generation e-cig aerosol impairs endothelial function comparably to cigarette smoke. METHODS: We exposed rats to aerosol from Virginia Tobacco flavor JUUL, an e-cig tank system using unflavored freebase nicotine e-liquid, Marlboro Red combustible tobacco cigarettes, or clean air for 10 cycles of 2 second inhalation over 5 minutes. Endothelial function (FMD) was measured pre- and post-exposure. Blood was collected 20 mins post-exposure for serum nicotine analysis. RESULTS: Aerosol/smoke from JUUL, previous generation e-cigs, and cigarettes all impaired FMD. The extent of impairment ranged from 34%-58%, although the differences between groups were insignificant. Nicotine was highest in serum from the JUUL group; for the other e-cig and cigarette groups, nicotine levels were lower and comparable to each other. CONCLUSIONS: Aerosol from JUUL and previous generation e-cigs impairs endothelial function in rats, comparable to impairment by cigarette smoke.
OBJECTIVES: JUUL and earlier generation electronic cigarettes (e-cigs) are promoted as being less hazardous than cigarettes. While JUUL Labs, in particular, claims that switching from smoking to vaping has beneficial impacts, the health effects of such products are not well understood. We investigated whether exposure to JUUL and previous generation e-cig aerosol impairs endothelial function comparably to cigarette smoke. METHODS: We exposed rats to aerosol from Virginia Tobacco flavor JUUL, an e-cig tank system using unflavored freebase nicotine e-liquid, Marlboro Red combustible tobacco cigarettes, or clean air for 10 cycles of 2 second inhalation over 5 minutes. Endothelial function (FMD) was measured pre- and post-exposure. Blood was collected 20 mins post-exposure for serum nicotine analysis. RESULTS: Aerosol/smoke from JUUL, previous generation e-cigs, and cigarettes all impaired FMD. The extent of impairment ranged from 34%-58%, although the differences between groups were insignificant. Nicotine was highest in serum from the JUUL group; for the other e-cig and cigarette groups, nicotine levels were lower and comparable to each other. CONCLUSIONS: Aerosol from JUUL and previous generation e-cigs impairs endothelial function in rats, comparable to impairment by cigarette smoke.
Authors: Kranthi Pinnamaneni; Richard E Sievers; Rikki Sharma; Amanda M Selchau; Gustavo Gutierrez; Eric J Nordsieck; Robert Su; Songtao An; Qiumei Chen; Xiaoyin Wang; Ronak Derakhshandeh; Kirstin Aschbacher; Christian Heiss; Stanton A Glantz; Suzaynn F Schick; Matthew L Springer Journal: Nicotine Tob Res Date: 2013-12-03 Impact factor: 4.244
Authors: Roberto Carnevale; Sebastiano Sciarretta; Francesco Violi; Cristina Nocella; Lorenzo Loffredo; Ludovica Perri; Mariangela Peruzzi; Antonino G M Marullo; Elena De Falco; Isotta Chimenti; Valentina Valenti; Giuseppe Biondi-Zoccai; Giacomo Frati Journal: Chest Date: 2016-04-22 Impact factor: 9.410
Authors: D S Celermajer; K E Sorensen; V M Gooch; D J Spiegelhalter; O I Miller; I D Sullivan; J K Lloyd; J E Deanfield Journal: Lancet Date: 1992-11-07 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: D S Celermajer; K E Sorensen; D Georgakopoulos; C Bull; O Thomas; J Robinson; J E Deanfield Journal: Circulation Date: 1993-11 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Andreas J Flammer; Todd Anderson; David S Celermajer; Mark A Creager; John Deanfield; Peter Ganz; Naomi M Hamburg; Thomas F Lüscher; Michael Shechter; Stefano Taddei; Joseph A Vita; Amir Lerman Journal: Circulation Date: 2012-08-07 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Karen A Cullen; Bridget K Ambrose; Andrea S Gentzke; Benjamin J Apelberg; Ahmed Jamal; Brian A King Journal: MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep Date: 2018-11-16 Impact factor: 17.586
Authors: Rebecca J Evans-Polce; Megan E Patrick; Sean Esteban McCabe; Richard A Miech Journal: Drug Alcohol Depend Date: 2020-09-19 Impact factor: 4.492
Authors: Amber Mills; Duaa Dakhlallah; Madison Robinson; Ally Kirk; Sam Llavina; Jonathan W Boyd; Paul D Chantler; I Mark Olfert Journal: Exp Physiol Date: 2022-06-17 Impact factor: 2.858
Authors: Briana Renda; Allyson K Andrade; Jude A Frie; Cassandra L Sgarbossa; Jennifer E Murray; Jibran Y Khokhar Journal: Drug Alcohol Depend Date: 2020-08-05 Impact factor: 4.492
Authors: Kimberly G Wagoner; Jessica L King; Cynthia K Suerken; Beth A Reboussin; Jennifer Cornacchione Ross; Erin L Sutfin Journal: Tob Control Date: 2020-08-26 Impact factor: 7.552
Authors: Sairam V Jabba; Alexandra N Diaz; Hanno C Erythropel; Julie B Zimmerman; Sven-Eric Jordt Journal: Nicotine Tob Res Date: 2020-12-15 Impact factor: 4.244
Authors: Briana Renda; Allyson K Andrade; Adiia P S Stone; Rita El Azali; Michael Sharivker; Jibran Y Khokhar; Monica Antenos; Jennifer E Murray Journal: Psychopharmacology (Berl) Date: 2021-03-01 Impact factor: 4.415