Literature DB >> 32041833

Acute effects of JUUL and IQOS in cigarette smokers.

Sarah Maloney1,2, Alisha Eversole1,2, Melanie Crabtree1,2, Eric Soule2,3, Thomas Eissenberg1,2, Alison Breland4,2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: JUUL is an electronic cigarette that aerosolises a nicotine-containing liquid, while IQOS heats tobacco to produce an aerosol. Both are marketed to smokers, but their effects have seldom been examined in this population.
METHODS: Eighteen cigarette smokers (13 men) with no JUUL or IQOS experience completed a within-subject, laboratory study assessing nicotine delivery and subjective effects after controlled (10 puffs, ~30 s interpuff interval) and ad libitum (90 min) use of JUUL, IQOS or own-brand (OB) cigarettes.
RESULTS: JUUL increased mean plasma nicotine concentration significantly from 2.2 (SD=0.7) ng/mL to 9.8 (4.9) ng/mL after 10 puffs and to 11.5 (9.3) ng/mL after ad libitum use. IQOS increased mean plasma nicotine significantly from 2.1 (0.2) ng/mL to 12.7 (6.2) ng/mL after 10 puffs and to 11.3 (8.0) ng/mL after ad libitum use. OB increased mean plasma nicotine significantly from 2.1 (0.2) ng/mL to 20.4 (11.4) ng/mL after 10 puffs and to 21.0 (10.2) ng/mL after ad libitum use. Mean OB plasma nicotine concentration was significantly higher than JUUL and IQOS. OB increased expired carbon monoxide concentration, but IQOS and JUUL did not. 'Craving a cigarette/nicotine' and 'Urges to smoke' were reduced significantly for all products following the directed bout.
CONCLUSIONS: Among smokers, JUUL and IQOS delivered less nicotine than cigarettes. Also, in this sample, IQOS and OB reduced abstinence symptoms more effectively than JUUL. Additional work with experienced JUUL and IQOS users is needed, as their nicotine delivery profiles and subjective experiences may differ. © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

Entities:  

Keywords:  addiction; electronic nicotine delivery devices; non-cigarette tobacco products

Year:  2020        PMID: 32041833      PMCID: PMC7864587          DOI: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2019-055475

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Tob Control        ISSN: 0964-4563            Impact factor:   7.552


  25 in total

1.  Evaluation of the brief questionnaire of smoking urges (QSU-brief) in laboratory and clinical settings.

Authors:  L S Cox; S T Tiffany; A G Christen
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 4.244

Review 2.  A consideration of the role of gas/particle partitioning in the deposition of nicotine and other tobacco smoke compounds in the respiratory tract.

Authors:  J F Pankow
Journal:  Chem Res Toxicol       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 3.739

3.  Withdrawal-suppressing effects of a novel smoking system: comparison with own brand, not own brand, and de-nicotinized cigarettes.

Authors:  A R Buchhalter; L Schrinel; T Eissenberg
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 4.244

4.  iQOS: evidence of pyrolysis and release of a toxicant from plastic.

Authors:  Barbara Davis; Monique Williams; Prue Talbot
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2018-03-13       Impact factor: 7.552

Review 5.  Heat-not-Burn Tobacco Products: Tobacco Industry Claims No Substitute for Science.

Authors:  Brian P Jenssen; Susan C Walley; Sharon A McGrath-Morrow
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2017-12-12       Impact factor: 7.124

6.  Free-Base and Total Nicotine, Reactive Oxygen Species, and Carbonyl Emissions From IQOS, a Heated Tobacco Product.

Authors:  Rola Salman; Soha Talih; Rachel El-Hage; Christina Haddad; Nareg Karaoghlanian; Ahmad El-Hellani; Najat A Saliba; Alan Shihadeh
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2019-08-19       Impact factor: 4.244

7.  Preliminary evaluation of a novel smoking system: effects on subjective and physiological measures and on smoking behavior.

Authors:  A R Buchhalter; T Eissenberg
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 4.244

8.  Clinical laboratory evaluation of potential reduced exposure products for smokers.

Authors:  Alison B Breland; Bethea A Kleykamp; Thomas Eissenberg
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 4.244

9.  Effects of Switching to a Heat-Not-Burn Tobacco Product on Biologically Relevant Biomarkers to Assess a Candidate Modified Risk Tobacco Product: A Randomized Trial.

Authors:  Frank Lüdicke; S Michael Ansari; Nicola Lama; Nicolas Blanc; Marija Bosilkovska; Andrea Donelli; Patrick Picavet; Gizelle Baker; Christelle Haziza; Manuel Peitsch; Rolf Weitkunat
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2019-07-03       Impact factor: 4.254

10.  Tobacco-specific nitrosamines (TSNA) in heated tobacco product IQOS.

Authors:  Noel J Leigh; Mary N Palumbo; Anthony M Marino; Richard J O'Connor; Maciej Lukasz Goniewicz
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2018-09-21       Impact factor: 7.552

View more
  11 in total

1.  Device features and user behaviors as predictors of dependence among never-smoking electronic cigarette users: PATH Wave 4.

Authors:  Ashley E Douglas; Margaret G Childers; Katelyn F Romm; Nicholas J Felicione; Jenny E Ozga; Melissa D Blank
Journal:  Addict Behav       Date:  2021-10-21       Impact factor: 3.913

2.  Clinical Pharmacology of Electronic Nicotine Delivery Systems (ENDS): Implications for Benefits and Risks in the Promotion of the Combusted Tobacco Endgame.

Authors:  Neal L Benowitz; Gideon St Helen; Evangelia Liakoni
Journal:  J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2021-08       Impact factor: 2.860

3.  Tobacco-use behavior and toxicant exposure among current dual users of electronic cigarettes and tobacco cigarettes.

Authors:  Caroline O Cobb; Rebecca C Lester; Alyssa K Rudy; Cosima Hoetger; Megan Scott; Makeda Austin; Alison Montpetit; Thokozeni Lipato; Amanda L Graham; Andrew J Barnes; Thomas Eissenberg
Journal:  Exp Clin Psychopharmacol       Date:  2020-07-13       Impact factor: 3.492

4.  Predicting molecular mechanisms, pathways, and health outcomes induced by Juul e-cigarette aerosol chemicals using the Comparative Toxicogenomics Database.

Authors:  Cynthia J Grondin; Allan Peter Davis; Jolene A Wiegers; Thomas C Wiegers; Daniela Sciaky; Robin J Johnson; Carolyn J Mattingly
Journal:  Curr Res Toxicol       Date:  2021-08-05

5.  Dependence and Use Characteristics of Adult JUUL Electronic Cigarette Users.

Authors:  Jessica Yingst; Jonathan Foulds; Andrea L Hobkirk
Journal:  Subst Use Misuse       Date:  2020-10-29       Impact factor: 2.164

6.  Nicotine delivery and relief of craving after consumption of European JUUL e-cigarettes prior and after pod modification.

Authors:  Nadja Mallock; Andrea Rabenstein; Solveig Gernun; Peter Laux; Christoph Hutzler; Susanne Karch; Gabriele Koller; Frank Henkler-Stephani; Maria Kristina Parr; Oliver Pogarell; Andreas Luch; Tobias Rüther
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-06-08       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Drug and alcohol dependence acute effects of pod-style e-cigarettes in vaping-naïve smokers.

Authors:  Natalia Peraza; Mariel S Bello; Sara J Schiff; Junhan Cho; Yi Zhang; Carly Callahan; Alayna Tackett; Adam M Leventhal
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2021-09-21       Impact factor: 4.492

Review 8.  Nicotine delivery and cigarette equivalents from vaping a JUULpod.

Authors:  Judith J Prochaska; Erin A Vogel; Neal Benowitz
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2021-03-24       Impact factor: 6.953

9.  Heat-not-burn Tobacco Products and the Increased Risk for Poly-tobacco Use.

Authors:  Pallav Pokhrel; Thaddeus A Herzog; Crissy T Kawamoto; Pebbles Fagan
Journal:  Am J Health Behav       Date:  2021-01-01

10.  Nicotine pharmacokinetics of electronic cigarettes: A pooled data analysis from the literature.

Authors:  Karin Jacobson; Javier Martinez; Sylvain Larroque; Ian W Jones; Thilo Paschke
Journal:  Toxicol Rep       Date:  2020-12-19
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.