Wenyang Xu1,2, Binbin Zhang Molino2,3, Fang Cheng4,5, Paul J Molino2, Zhilian Yue2, Dandan Su4, Xiaoju Wang1, Stefan Willför1, Chunlin Xu1, Gordon G Wallace2. 1. Laboratory of Wood and Paper Chemistry , Johan Gadolin Process Chemistry Centre , Åbo Akademi University , Porthansgatan 3 , 20500 Turku , Finland. 2. ARC Centre of Excellence for Electromaterials Science, Intelligent Polymer Research Institute , University of Wollongong , Wollongong , NSW 2522 , Australia. 3. Faculty of Engineering , Yokohama National University , Yokohama 240-8501 , Japan. 4. School of Pharmaceutical Sciences (Shenzhen) , Sun Yat-sen University , 510006 Guangzhou , China. 5. Cell Biology, Faculty of Science and Engineering , Åbo Akademi University , Tykistökatu 6 , 20520 Turku , Finland.
Abstract
Cellulose nanofibrils (CNFs) in the form of hydrogels stand out as a platform biomaterial in bioink formulation for 3D printing because of their low cytotoxicity and structural similarity to extracellular matrices. In the present study, 3D scaffolds were successfully printed with low-concentration inks formulated by 1 w/v % 2,2,6,6-tetramethylpiperidine-1-oxyl radical (TEMPO)-oxidized CNF with less than 1 w/v % gelatin methacrylate (GelMA). Quartz crystal microbalance with dissipation monitoring (QCM-D) measurements showed strong interaction between the two biopolymers. The UV cross-linking ability of GelMA (≤1 w/v %) was enhanced in the presence of TEMPO-oxidized CNFs. Multiple factors including strong physical interaction between CNF and GelMA, in situ cross-linking of CNF by Ca2+, and UV cross-linking of GelMA enabled successful 3D printing of low-concentration inks of CNF/GelMA into scaffolds possessing good structural stability. The mechanical strength of the scaffolds was tuned in the range of 2.5 to 5 kPa. The cell culture with 3T3 fibroblasts revealed noncytotoxic and biocompatible features for the formulated inks and printed scaffolds. More importantly, the incorporated GelMA in the CNF hydrogel promoted the proliferation of fibroblasts. The developed low-concentration CNF/GelMA formulations with a facile yet effective approach to fabricate scaffolds showed great potential in 3D printing for wound healing application.
Cellulose nanofibrils (CNFs) in the form of hydrogels stand out as a platform biomaterial in bioink formulation for 3D printing because of their low cytotoxicity and structural similarity to extracellular matrices. In the present study, 3D scaffolds were successfully printed with low-concentration inks formulated by 1 w/v % 2,2,6,6-tetramethylpiperidine-1-oxyl radical (TEMPO)-oxidized CNF with less than 1 w/v % gelatin methacrylate (GelMA). Quartz crystal microbalance with dissipation monitoring (QCM-D) measurements showed strong interaction between the two biopolymers. The UV cross-linking ability of GelMA (≤1 w/v %) was enhanced in the presence of TEMPO-oxidized CNFs. Multiple factors including strong physical interaction between CNF and GelMA, in situ cross-linking of CNF by Ca2+, and UV cross-linking of GelMA enabled successful 3D printing of low-concentration inks of CNF/GelMA into scaffolds possessing good structural stability. The mechanical strength of the scaffolds was tuned in the range of 2.5 to 5 kPa. The cell culture with 3T3 fibroblasts revealed noncytotoxic and biocompatible features for the formulated inks and printed scaffolds. More importantly, the incorporated GelMA in the CNF hydrogel promoted the proliferation of fibroblasts. The developed low-concentration CNF/GelMA formulations with a facile yet effective approach to fabricate scaffolds showed great potential in 3D printing for wound healing application.
Three-dimensional (3D) printing allows
the patterning of soft biocompatible
hydrogels into 3D tissue that mimic constructs, generating intricately
structured scaffolds that permit researchers to study cell–cell
and cell–matrix interactions.[1,2] Cellulose nanomaterials,
including cellulose nanocrystals (CNCs)[3−7] and cellulose nanofibrils (CNFs), have attracted increasing attention
as bioink constituents for 3D bioprinting.[8,9] This
is attributable to their low cytotoxicity, structural similarity to
extracellular matrices (ECM), and favorable rheological properties.
As the pioneer in this field, Gatenholm’s group has largely
contributed to the development of nanocellulose-based bioinks from
2015 for different applications including cartilage regeneration,
human chondrocytes redifferentiation, and adipose tissue engineering.[10−16]As required in extrusion-based hydrogel printing, the rheological
property (i.e., flow behavior) of a well-defined bioink must show
shear thinning and thixotropic behaviors, which is consistent with
the nature of nanocellulose.[3,17−19] Still, the most challenging aspect is to achieve good structural
stability of the printed constructs, particularly for the fabrication
of objects with complex geometries. Therefore, an auxiliary material
is preferable to be incorporated in CNF-based bioink formulation,
which imposes functionalities to aid printability and good fidelity,
as well as to increase ink bioactivity.[8,9] Common strategies
include direct or indirect solidification of printed objects by cross-linking
either nanocellulose[20,21] or the incorporated auxiliary
materials. The auxiliary materials can be natural or synthetic polymers
that are amenable to ionic cross-linking,[16] photochemical cross-linking,[4] thermal
cross-linking,[13] or as a sacrificial supporter.[22]Gelatin, a derivative of collagen, resembles
the biological structure
of collagen in the native ECM tissues. Gelatin retains its natural
cell binding motifs, such as RGD peptides, which improve cell responses
such as cell adhesion, proliferation, migration, and differentiation.[23,24] Gelatin together with other biopolymers such as alginate,[25] collagen,[26] and hyaluronic
acid[27] has been formulated into hydrogel
bioinks for assessment in various biomedical applications. Moreover,
the methacrylated gelatin (GelMA) with favorable thermal sensitivity
and photo-cross-linking ability has been broadly evaluated in bioink
formulations.[28−30] Low-concentration GelMA (i.e., ≤5 %) bioinks
are attractive because of their relatively loose polymer network that
can encourage cell–cell interaction, migration, and more efficient
metabolism. Recently, Yin et al. successfully established a two-step
cross-linking strategy for bioprinting of 5–30 w/v % GelMA
assisted with thermal-sensitive gelatin.[31] Shin et al. have reported 3D printing of 5 w/v % GelMA by tuning
its rheological property with different concentrations of mechanically
grinded CNF suspensions. The interconnected pore network established
by such hydrogels benefits the cell viability and supports cell proliferation
as well.[32]The approach used in the
present study employs an extremely low
concentration of GelMA (≤1 w/v %) as the auxiliary material
for the TEMPO-mediated oxidized CNF based bioink. Herein, the interaction
between negatively charged CNF and GelMA could not only regulate the
viscosity of the formulated bioinks but also facilitate the cross-linking
of low-concentration GelMA (≤1 w/v %). First, the bioinks of
CNFs and GelMA were formulated and optimized through rheological studies
and QCM-D measurements. Well-defined and freestanding 3D hydrogel
scaffolds of CNF/GelMA in high resolutions were successfully fabricated
via an extrusion-based printing technique. Finally, the cytotoxicity
and bioactivity of the CNF/GelMA bioinks were assessed by cell viability
and cell proliferation of 3T3 fibroblasts.
Materials
and Methods
Materials
TEMPO-oxidized CNF (CNF) (1.0 w/v %) with
moderate charge density (1.14 ± 0.07 mmol/g) was produced by
TEMPO/NaClO/NaBr oxidation according to Liu et al.[33] Gelatin (porcine skin, type A, bloom number 300) was purchased
from Sigma-Aldrich. GelMA (DS 70 ± 8%) was produced from a reaction
with methacrylic anhydride.[24,34] CaCl2 and
2-hydroxy-1-(4-(2-hydroxyethoxy)phenyl)-2-methyl-1-propanone (Irgacure
2959) were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich. PBS with 0.9 mM CaCl2 and 0.5 mM MgCl2 was purchased from Sigma-Aldrich
and used in all the studies except cell studies.
Bioink Formulation
Bioink formulation was prepared
using two methods. In the first method, dried GelMA powder was mixed
with the CNF hydrogel (1.0 w/v %) at 50 °C using a vortex mixer
(FINEPCR, Korea) until GelMA was completely dissolved to produce a
homogeneous ink. Scheme illustrates the procedure. The compositional ratios between CNF
and GelMA were 5:1 and 2:1 w/w (Table ). The second method involved loading of 1 mL of 10
w/v % GelMA solution into 9 mL of CNF hydrogel to form homogeneous
ink CNF:GelMA=9:10. Irgacure 2959 was selected as the photoinitiator
and added to each ink with a final concentration of 0.5 w/v %.
Scheme 1
Schematic Illustration of Bioink Formulation and Scaffold Printinga
From left to right: images
of GelMA and CNF hydrogel and their formulation process; simple illustration
of direct ink writing (DIW) printing working principle; optical microscopic
images of printed hydrogel scaffolds.
Table 1
Formulation and Printing Parameters
for CNF/GelMA Bioinks
ink code
CNF, w/v %
GelMA, w/v %
pressure,
kPa
speed, mm min–1
theoretical
diameter, mm
real diameter,
mm
CNFa
1
70
1000
0.25
0.59 ± 0.05
CNF:GelMA=5:1b
1
0.2
65
2000
0.24
0.45 ± 0.03
CNF:GelMA=2:1b
1
0.5
70
2000
0.26
0.57 ± 0.07
CNF:GelMA=9:10c
0.9
1
80
2000
0.25
0.60 ± 0.04
Printing tips with
27 G were used.
Dry powder
of GelMA was mixed with
1 w/v % CNF hydrogel, resulting in 0.2 and 0.5 w/v % final GelMA concentrations,
respectively, and printing tips with 30 G were used.
10 w/v % GelMA solution added to
1 w/v % CNF, resulting in 1 w/v % GelMA final concentration and 0.9
w/v% CNF final concentration, and printing tips with 30 G were used.
Schematic Illustration of Bioink Formulation and Scaffold Printinga
From left to right: images
of GelMA and CNF hydrogel and their formulation process; simple illustration
of direct ink writing (DIW) printing working principle; optical microscopic
images of printed hydrogel scaffolds.Printing tips with
27 G were used.Dry powder
of GelMA was mixed with
1 w/v % CNF hydrogel, resulting in 0.2 and 0.5 w/v % final GelMA concentrations,
respectively, and printing tips with 30 G were used.10 w/v % GelMA solution added to
1 w/v % CNF, resulting in 1 w/v % GelMA final concentration and 0.9
w/v% CNF final concentration, and printing tips with 30 G were used.
Scaffold Fabrication
Scaffolds were fabricated with
a customized extrusion-based 3D printer KIMM SPS1000 Bioplotter (Machtronics
4 Technology, Korea). The KIMM Bioplotter software was used to produce
a G-code file for printing. A 3D scaffold model with dimensions of
10 mm wide, 10 mm long, and 2 or 3 mm high was designed with a 1 mm
filament grid and 0.2 mm layer thickness. The formulated bioinks were
transferred to a 5 cc EFD syringe (Optimum by Nordson EFD, USA), which
was controlled by a pneumatic dispensing head with a pressure regulator
(AD 3000C, Iwashita Engineering, Japan). Precision tips (25 and 30
GA, Nordson EFD, USA) were used as the dispensing nozzles. 5% CaCl2 solution was added dropwise on the substrate to stabilize
the printed structure. UV (365 nm) irradiation with an intensity of
10 mW/cm2 for 5 min was applied to cross-link GelMA. The
investigated printing parameters of pressure and speed are listed
in Table .
Characterization
Rheology
Rheology studies were carried out on a Physica
MCR 301 rheometer (Anton-Paar, Austria) with a cone-plate geometry
(ø 50 mm and 1°). The viscosity property was recorded with
shear rates of 0.01–100 s–1 at room temperature.
Oscillation measurements were performed on the inks under a temperature
linear ramp of 40 to 4 °C with constant strain at 1% and sweep
at 1.5 Hz. Yield stress of the inks was tested with varying shear
stress from 1 to 100 Pa. Storage and loss modulus during UV gelation
were tested under UV intensity at 10 mW/cm2.
Quartz Crystal
Microbalance with Dissipation Monitoring (QCM-D)
The adsorption
of GelMA on CNF was studied by QCM-D using a Q-Sense
E4 instrument (Q-sense, Västra Frölunda, Sweden) according
to the modified method from Österberg et al.,[35,36] CNF dispersion was prepared by diluting the CNF hydrogel (1.0 w/v
% dry matter content) with Milli-Q water followed by ultrasonication
at 25% amplitude for 5 min using a Branson Digital Sonifier 450 (Branson
Corporation, Danbury, CT). The diluted CNF dispersion was then centrifuged
at 8000 rpm for 30 min at room temperature with a PrO-Research centrifuge
(Centurion Scientific Ltd.) to separate CNF fibrils from larger fibril
bundles. The supernatant fraction with the finest CNF fibrils (about
1.25 mg/mL dry matter content) was collected for further use.In order to enhance retention of CNF, polyethylene imine (PEI) was
preadsorbed on the surface of the gold-coated quartz crystals by passing
an aqueous PEI solution with a concentration of 0.2 mg/mL through
the QCM-D measurement chamber for 20 min, followed by rinsing with
DI water. Diluted CNF dispersion was then injected into the QCM-D
chamber for adsorption of the CNF layer onto the PEI-modified QCM-D
sensor for 20 min followed by rinsing with DI water. Thereafter, the
CNF-modified sensors were exposed to GelMA solutions with gradient
concentrations (based on weight ratios of 1:2, 1:5, and 10:9 relative
to dry content of CNF). The adsorption of a 0.5 w/v % gelatin solution
was also tested. The flow rate through the QCM-D chambers was set
to 40 μL/min and kept constant during measurements.Both
the frequency and dissipation parameters were recorded during
the adsorption of material to the QCM-D sensor surface. The significant
positive shift in the dissipation parameter, relative to the frequency,
on adsorption of GelMA and gelatin to the sensor surface is representative
of the adsorption of a soft viscoelastic surface layer, and therefore,
a viscoelastic model is required to appropriately characterize the
material properties. Therefore, the Voigt model was applied to the
QCM-D data set using the Q-Sense QTools analysis software Version
3.0.10.286 (Biolin Scientific AB). All experiments were run in triplicate.
The following input parameters within the model provided the best
fit for the layer density (1150 kg/m3), fluid density (1020
kg/m3), layer viscosity (10–6 ≤
10–2 kg/ms), layer shear modulus (104 ≤ 108 Pa), and mass (1.15 ≤ 1.155 ng/cm2). The third, fifth, and seventh overtones were
used for modeling calculations. According to the Sauerbrey equation
(eq ), the change in
frequency (Δf) is proportional to the mass
adsorbed per unit surface (Δm)where C is
the sensitivity constant (here, C = 0.177 mg/m2) and n is the overtone number (here, n = 3). Equation is valid for thin, rigid, and uniform films, but it underestimates
mass for viscoelastic films, when dissipation ΔD is >1.[37] Therefore, the calculated
mass
values presented are estimations and should not be considered as absolute
values.
Mechanical Tests
Compressive strength of the printed
scaffolds was measured with a Shimadzu EZ-L universal testing machine
with a 10 N load cell controlled by the TRAPEZIUMX software. The compression
speed was set with a constant rate of 0.5 mm/min. Compressive Young’s
modulus was calculated using eq where F (N)
is the recorded compressive force, L0 (mm)
is the original height of the scaffold, A is the
area of the scaffold in contact with the upper compression plate (here,
the scaffold with solid surface of 10 × 10 mm was used), and
ΔL is set with a constant displacement of 2
mm.Cast disc samples were also prepared for compression tests.
The uniform discs were cast by first injecting formulated inks into
an 8.0 mm disc mold followed by adding CaCl2 solution for
ionic cross-linking; the cross-linked discs were then exposed to 5
min of UV irradiation. The cast discs were stored in PBS/Ca2+ overnight prior to compression tests.
AFM Surface Young’s
Modulus Measurements
The
surface Young’s moduli of 3D printed scaffolds of either CNF
or CNF/GelMA scaffolds were measured using a JPK Nanowizard II AFM
(JPK Instruments AG, Berlin, Germany). Force measurements were performed
in PBS using a DNP-S10 silicon nitride cantilever (spring constant
∼0.06 N m–1) with a 10 nm round tip. The
spring constant of each cantilever was calibrated using the thermal
method, and the deflection sensitivity was determined by performing
a force measurement on a clean glass slide in PBS prior to undertaking
measurements on the scaffolds. Force measurements were performed at
a minimum of three different locations on each scaffold, with five
separate measurements taken at each location and averaged. Three separate
scaffolds were analyzed for each material.
Swelling Tests
The printed hydrogel scaffolds were
washed with Milli-Q water to remove the excess Ca2+ and
then frozen by liquid N2 prior to freeze-drying. When the
freeze-dried scaffolds were rehydrated with Milli-Q water, the gravimetrical
water uptake was measured after the excess water on the surface was
carefully removed with tissue paper. Then, the swelling ratio was
calculated according to eq .
Optical Microscopy and Scanning Electron Microscopy
The
microscopic images of the printed scaffolds were observed using
a LEICA M205A optical microscope. The filament diameter was calculated
on the average of 20 filaments among the printed scaffolds. Morphological
features of the scaffold strut were characterized by scanning electron
microscopy (SEM) after freeze-drying.
Quantitative Cell Viability
MTT Assay and Cell Attachment Assay
3T3 fibroblast cells,
which were isolated from E12 SVJ129mouse
embryos to establish 3T3 cells in the lab, were maintained with DMEM
(4.5 mM glucose) supplemented with 2 mM l-glutamine, 100
IU/mL penicillin and streptomycin, and 10% heat-inactivated FBS (Invitrogen)
and were incubated with 5% CO2 at 37 °C and 95% humidity.
The 2D control cells are the cells growing on coverslips. After splitting,
the initial cell seeding density was 1 × 105 cells/1.9
cm2, and once the cell suspension had been in contact with
the matrix for 12 h, nonadherent cells were washed off and the plate
were frozen for 30 min at −70 °C. The 24 well plates were
then thawed, and cells were stained in 0.5% crystal violet dye for
20 min. After washing, samples were fixed with methanol for 20 min,
and then the optical density of each well was determined at 570 nm
(OD570) with the microplate reader. Similarly, cytotoxicity
evaluation of the 3D matrix was performed after 24 h of cell incubation
using the MTT kit (Sigma) according to the supplier’s manual.
The optical density of each well in 24 well plates was immediately
measured at 570 nm using the microplate reader and with wavelength
higher than 650 nm to subtract the background.
Confocal
Image Analysis of Cells on the Scaffolds
Cells
were incubated with the 3D matrix in the cell culture medium for 72
h. Then, cell samples were fixed with 3.7% paraformaldehyde for 30
min followed by a mixture of acetone and methanol (1:1) for 5 min
in ice. Triton X (0.2%) in PBS was used to permeabilize the cell membranes,
and 10% FBS in Triton X-100 and PBS was used for blocking for 2 h.
The cells were stained with Phalloidin conjugated with Alexa Fluor
546 for 3 h and counterstained with DAPI blue for 5 min before being
mounted onto the glass slides. Confocal images were acquired at room
temperature using Zeiss Zen software on a Zeiss LSM780 confocal laser
scanning microscope (Carl Zeiss, Inc.) with Plan-Apochromat 20×.
The following fluorochromes were used: Alexa Fluor 546 and 405.
Statistical Analysis
The results are expressed as mean
± STDEV. Comparisons between two groups were analyzed by two-tailed t tests. Comparisons between multiple groups were analyzed
by one-way ANOVA. P < 0.05 was considered significant.
Statistical differences were calculated with the two-tailed unpaired t test, and differences were considered significant at p ≤ 0.05.
Results and Discussion
Bioink
Formulation: Molecular Interaction Characterized by QCM-D
and Ink Rheological Property
To achieve good printability,
the formulated inks are required to be homogeneous and extrudable
with a consistent flow without clogging while printing. CNFs in this
study were produced by the pretreatment of TEMPO-mediated oxidation
followed by high-pressure homogenization. Thus, the dominating nanofibers
in the inks had narrow size distribution in terms of fiber length,[33] which resulted in a successful printing process
without needle clogging. The density of charge introduced by TEMPO-mediated
oxidation plays a decisive role in the disintegration of fibers to
prepare nanodimensional fibrils. However, it was found out that a
relatively lower surface charge density could better facilitate cell
growth and proliferation.[38] Thus, a negative
surface charge in a density of 1.14 ± 0.07 mmol/g was introduced
on the fiber surface with −COO– during the
TEMPO-mediated oxidation. Meanwhile, the GelMA is positively charged
when the ink is formulated under neutral conditions (pKa around 9).[39−41] Thus, the ionic interaction between
two biopolymers is anticipated. To achieve ink homogeneity, the concentration
of GelMA was screened from 5 w/v % down to a maximum of 1 w/v % to
avoid phase separation caused by ionic interaction between CNF and
GelMA.It is crucial to understand the macromolecular interactions
between CNF and GelMA in order to study the physiochemical properties
of the formulated bioink. Therefore, the interaction between GelMA
and the CNF layer was studied in situ with the QCM-D technique in
aqueous media. As indicated by the adsorption kinetics of various
concentrations of GelMA on CNF (presented in Figure a), the GelMA was strongly adsorbed onto
the CNF layer. As estimated from the Sauerbrey equation, the absorption
mass of GelMA went up from 100 to 150 mg/m2 when the concentration
of GelMA increased from 0.2 to 0.5 w/v %. As shown in Figure b, the adsorption amount became
less significant with further increases in the GelMA concentration,
suggesting that the CNF layer became saturated with GelMA. This is
correlated with the findings that the formulation of bionks using
concentrations of GelMA of less than 1 w/v % could avoid phase separation.
As previously studied in the adsorption of various biopolymers on
CNFs,[36,42,43] strong hydrogen
bonding and physical entanglement mainly contribute to the adsorption.
In this case, the high adsorption mass amount and strong affinity
of GelMA to CNF are probably associated with ionic interactions in
addition to hydrogen bonding between both macromolecules.[39] Moreover, 0.5 w/v % gelatin was also used in
the QCM-D measurement as a comparison with GelMA. It showed much less
adsorption compared with GelMA solutions (Figure a,b), which indicated that the methacryloylation
of gelatin had an impact in an interactive manner between the gelatin
molecule and the CNF surface, possibly due to the hydrophobic nature
and steric effect of the grafted methacryloyls.
Figure 1
QCM-D analysis: (a) adsorption
of GelMA onto CNF model layer with
GelMA concentration from 0.2 to 1.0 w/v % followed by desorption of
free GelMA with rinsing DI water and the adsorption of a 0.5 w/v%
gelatin solution was also tested; (b) amounts of adsorbed CNF on the
crystal and adsorbed GelMA on the CNF layer. Rheological analysis:
(c) shear-thinning property of the formulated bioinks of CNF hydrogel
(1.0 w/v %) and CNF/GelMA hydrogels with weight compositional ratios
of 5:1, 2:1, and 9:10. (d) Change of storage moduli of the formulated
bioinks after UV irradiation under oscillatory analysis indicating
efficient and effective UV cross-linking; UV was switched on at 120
s and continued for 6 min.
QCM-D analysis: (a) adsorption
of GelMA onto CNF model layer with
GelMA concentration from 0.2 to 1.0 w/v % followed by desorption of
free GelMA with rinsing DI water and the adsorption of a 0.5 w/v%
gelatin solution was also tested; (b) amounts of adsorbed CNF on the
crystal and adsorbed GelMA on the CNF layer. Rheological analysis:
(c) shear-thinning property of the formulated bioinks of CNF hydrogel
(1.0 w/v %) and CNF/GelMA hydrogels with weight compositional ratios
of 5:1, 2:1, and 9:10. (d) Change of storage moduli of the formulated
bioinks after UV irradiation under oscillatory analysis indicating
efficient and effective UV cross-linking; UV was switched on at 120
s and continued for 6 min.The rheological behaviors of the formulated bioinks were
assessed
to validate their feasibility for 3D printing. The viscosity properties
of CNF/GelMA bioinks as investigated are shown in Figure c. Also studied by other researchers,[16,20] CNF itself showed a shear-thinning behavior, which is required for
the extrusion-based printing process. By incorporating GelMA into
the CNF hydrogel, similar yield-flow behaviors were registered for
all the formulated inks. However, the zero-shear viscosity plateau
was prolonged with the addition of more GelMA, as it might require
a longer time for the polymer chains to orient in the formulated bioinks.
Meanwhile, the zero-shear viscosity of the ink decreased with the
incorporation of GelMA because of the physiochemical interactions
between the two macromolecules, which is consistent with the QCM-D
data. Thus, the formulated inks became easier to flow when GelMA was
incorporated. This was consistent with employing lower printing pressure
in printing the formulated CNF/GelMA ink compared with CNF itself,
which will be discussed later.The decreased storage modulus
of the inks (Figure d) with more GelMA was also revealed when
the oscillation measurements were performed on the formulated bioinks.
The bioink viscoelasticity was recorded for 12 min with UV turning
on at 120 s. Immediately after UV irradiation was turned on, the storage
modulus increased rapidly for all the ink formulations of CNF/GelMA
followed by a level-off plateau, referred to the required cross-linking
time. As shown in Figure d, the required time for all the formulated inks to reach
full cross-linking was as short as within 30 s. The rate of cross-linking
is important for biofabrication that requires gelation during a very
short time window, such as for in situ gelation during extrusion.[44] For controls, measurements were also performed
on CNF and 1.0% GelMA solution, and their viscoelasticity did not
change upon UV irradiation, yet even the bioink of CNF:GelMA=5:1 containing
only 0.2 w/v % GelMA displayed an apparent cross-linking phenomenon,
as shown in Figure d. According to a recent study by O’Connell et al., no clear
cross-linking phenomenon was observed when GelMA concentration was
below 2.5 w/v %.[44] This indirectly revealed
that the presence of TEMPO-oxidized CNF could play a key role in facilitating
cross-linking of low-concentration GelMA. As well, the gelation time
for low-concentration GelMA in the presence of TEMPO-oxidized CNF
is comparable with that of high concentration of GelMA solutions (>5
w/v %) in O’Connell et al.’s study[44] when both 0.5 w/v % concentration of photoinitiator Irgacure
2959 and 10 mW/cm2 UV intensity were applied. Therefore,
it is hypothesized that the CNF fibers that supplied the matrix for
the GelMA oriented in a more entangled fashion with the methacryloyls
locally concentrated to facilitate the UV cross-linking, even at a
rather low concentration of GelMA.It is worth noting the different
ink behaviors regarding the variety
of starting CNFs. For example, in the previous studies by Markstedt
et al,[16,43] enzymatically and mechanically produced
CNFs were used without supplying surface charge like in the case of
TEMPO-oxidized CNF. First, the consistency of enzymatically and mechanically
produced CNF can be a few times higher than that of TEMPO-oxidized
CNF, and the shape fidelity can be enhanced by the high matter load
of the inks. Meanwhile, TEMPO-oxidized CNF prepared in our approach
is only present at a comparatively low consistency, and this, to some
extent, limits the matter load in the bioinks. However, in terms of
printing resolution, TEMPO-oxidized CNF was superior with being successfully
printed using the cylindrical steel tip (200 μm), compared to
a conical tip (420 μm) for noncharged CNFs.[16,43] More importantly, in the present study, the negatively charged CNF
by TEMPO-mediated oxidation facilitated the UV cross-linking of low-concentration
GelMA (less than 1.0 w/v %), possibly due to surface ionic interaction
between CNF and GelMA, whereas in another study using mechanically
grinded CNF as a rheology modifier and structural builder, 2 w/v %
CNF was required for 5 w/v % GelMA printing.[32]
Bioink Printability
The printability and shape fidelity
of the formulated bioinks were investigated by an extrusion-based
3D printer with a pneumatic dispensing system and cylindrical stainless-steel
tips. The printed strut diameters are determined by three parameters:
printing speed, extrusion pressure, and tip diameter. However, when
the viscoelasticity of the bioinks changes, the printing parameters
need to be adjusted accordingly. In order to reduce the complexity
to standardize the printing parameter, the same printing speed of
2000 mm/min was applied throughout this study. A uniform and reproducible
strut diameter of printed scaffolds was achieved by choosing appropriate
dispensing tip diameters and tuning extrusion pressure in a limited
range. Dispensing tips of 27 G (ø 0.2 mm) were used for the CNF
bioink, and tips of 30 G (ø 0.15 mm) were used for CNF/GelMA
bioinks. By tuning the pneumatic pressure between 60 and 80 kPa, the
extruded strut diameter was controlled at 0.25 ± 0.01 mm. The
screened parameters are listed in Table . Moreover, the diameter of dispensing tips
was adjusted from 0.2 to 0.15 mm when the ink was changed from CNF
to CNF/GelMA inks, which was consistent with the decreased storage
modulus of CNF/GelMA inks as discussed previously. This is because
the adsorption of GelMA on CNF has an impact on the viscoelasticity
of the formulated ink hydrogel and makes the flow through the needle
easier for the CNF/GelMA ink, as the decreased zero-shear viscosity
indicated in Figure c.Printability and shape fidelity are not only dependent on
the printing parameters but also determined by the solid content of
the bioinks, as well as cross-linking treatments during and after
printing. The incorporated GelMA increased the solid content in the
bioinks and supplied the secondary cross-linking network, which improved
the shape fidelity. In the current study, the carboxylic groups on
the CNF surface were utilized to supply instant ionic cross-linking
by adding 5% CaCl2 solution dropwise during printing. While
the printed object was completed, the whole scaffold was subjected
to UV irradiation to cross-link GelMA. Afterward, the scaffolds were
stored in PBS/Ca2+ solution for further study. Ca2+ ions temporally maintain the structural integrity of the printed
constructs, avoiding collapse before UV cross-linking. This enabled
the TEMPO-oxidized CNF to maintain the scaffold integrity at a low
concentration of 1 w/v % instead of using a high concentration, that
is, above 2.5 wt % dry consistency for the mechanically grinded CNF.[43] Meanwhile, as a facile approach, the rapid cross-linking
(as shown in Figure d) upon UV irradiation works more conveniently compared with introducing
a high dosage of chemicals for cross-linking.[32]
Scaffold Morphology
One of the goals of this study
was to develop printable inks, which could be printed with excellent
3D shape fidelity and long shelf-time stability. Therefore, the shape
fidelity of the printed scaffolds under physiological conditions was
assessed with optical microscopy imaging in PBS/Ca2+ buffer.
As shown in Figure , scaffolds in high resolution were observed with an excellent dimensional
stability. Adding GelMA into ink formulations made the printed struts
with clear and smooth boundaries when compared with CNF only, as shown
in the second column of Figure . The well-defined struts benefited from the possibility of
using extra fine tip diameters due to the excellent rheological behaviors
of these low-concentration bioinks. In addition, the surface charge
of CNF made it possible for instantaneous Ca2+ cross-linking
to keep shape fidelity.
Figure 2
Left two columns: optical microscopic images
showing morphology
of the printed scaffolds from the inks of CNF hydrogel (1.0 w/v %)
(a,b) and CNF/GelMA hydrogels with weight compositional ratios of
5:1 (f,g), 2:1 (k,l), and 9:10 (p,q). Right three columns: SEM images
of the printed scaffolds from the inks of CNF hydrogel (c–e)
and CNF/GelMA hydrogels with weight compositional ratios of 5:1 (h–j),
2:1 (m–o), and 9:10 (r–t). The images in the same column
have the same scale bar with 2 mm (a,f,k,p), 500 μm (b,g,l,q),
200 μm (c,h,m,r), 100 μm (d,i,n,s), and 20 μm (e,j,o,t)
from left to right column.
Left two columns: optical microscopic images
showing morphology
of the printed scaffolds from the inks of CNF hydrogel (1.0 w/v %)
(a,b) and CNF/GelMA hydrogels with weight compositional ratios of
5:1 (f,g), 2:1 (k,l), and 9:10 (p,q). Right three columns: SEM images
of the printed scaffolds from the inks of CNF hydrogel (c–e)
and CNF/GelMA hydrogels with weight compositional ratios of 5:1 (h–j),
2:1 (m–o), and 9:10 (r–t). The images in the same column
have the same scale bar with 2 mm (a,f,k,p), 500 μm (b,g,l,q),
200 μm (c,h,m,r), 100 μm (d,i,n,s), and 20 μm (e,j,o,t)
from left to right column.Similarly, as shown by the SEM images in Figure , the freeze-dried scaffolds
of CNF/GelMA
showed different surface morphologies from the CNF scaffolds. After
drying, the CNF scaffolds did not straightly align in their originally
printed form, and the pores between the struts in the scaffolds became
deformed without keeping the resolution as it is in hydrogel form.
From high-magnification images of the CNF scaffolds (Figure d,e), large CNF fiber bundles
and aggregates could be observed, which is due to the strong hydrogen
bonding after freeze-drying. For the dried scaffolds of CNF/GelMA,
the struts kept the alignments better than the CNF scaffolds. As shown
in the high-magnification images (Figure i,n,s,), the surface of the struts showed
a smoother morphology than that of the CNF scaffolds (Figure d). Moreover, the incorporated
GelMA gives more networks with increasing content of GelMA, as shown
in Figure j,o,t, which
is distinctive from the CNF scaffolds where only fiber bundles are
observed on the surface (Figure e). The adsorption of GelMA onto CNF hinders the formation
of hydrogen bonding between CNF fibers, which further has a significant
impact on guiding the fiber orientation.[32] In the sample of CNF:GelMA=9:10, the strut surface showed a microporous
structure, which is considered beneficial for cell attachment and
proliferation during in vivo conditions by improving diffusion rates
to and from the scaffolds.[45]The
average diameter of the printed struts increased by 1-fold
after swelling in PBS buffer compared with each theoretical diameter
as listed in Table . The scaffolds printed with CNF:GelMA=5:1 and 2:1 had average strut
diameters smaller than that of CNF scaffolds, indicating less swelling
of printed struts, which is possibly due to the cross-linked GelMA
restricting the swelling of the strut. However, the strut diameter
increased with increasing GelMA content, with CNF:GelMA=9:10 reaching
approximately 0.6 mm, which is similar to the strut diameter of CNF.
Although this was contrary to its cross-linking degree, it might be
due to the disruption of GelMA to the alignment and bonding between
CNF fibers, which counteracted the restriction from GelMA cross-linking.
Rehydration Property
The rehydration kinetics, otherwise
termed swelling ratio, is a crucial factor that needs consideration
for the biomedical application of hydrogel scaffolds. The rehydration
possibility directly refers to their hydration ability and stability
and indirectly reveals their mechanical stiffness and structural properties.[33,46] The swelling of the freeze-dried scaffolds, maintaining a moist
environment, is beneficial for wound healing.[47] The time-dependent swelling profiles were recorded by immersing
the freeze-dried scaffolds with Milli-Q water, as shown in Figure . The CNF aerogels
made of TEMPO-mediated oxidation can uptake water up to around 90
times its own weight, which is in line with what is reported in our
previous study.[38] Overall, the rehydration
equilibrium was restricted by the cross-linking of incorporated GelMA.
Meanwhile, the rehydration kinetics behaved differently between CNF
scaffolds and CNF/GelMA scaffolds. The CNF/GelMA scaffolds showed
rapid rehydration ability within the first minute, with the scaffolds
of CNF:GelMA=9:10 reaching equilibrium within 5 min. The rehydration
kinetics of CNF:GelMA=2:1 and 5:1 scaffolds showed two-step curves:
after rapid rehydration at 1 min, the swelling rate slowed down and
reached equilibrium after 8 h. However, the CNF scaffolds showed different
kinetics. CNF scaffolds had a slow rehydration rate for the first
5 min; then, a fast swelling rate resulted in absorption of around
90-fold water compared with their dry weight, followed by a much slower
swelling rate and reaching equilibrium at around 4 h. The three-step
water adsorption curve of CNF scaffolds can be attributed to the strong
hydrogen bonding between the CNF fibers, and it takes a longer time
for water to penetrate the fiber bundles after freeze-drying.[33,38] However, when a small amount of GelMA was introduced (CNF:GelMA=5:1
and 2:1), the rehydration kinetics changed to two-step curves. This
likely resulted from the adsorption of GelMA firmly binding with the
surface of CNF fibers, as QCM-D data indicated, which interrupted
the hydrogen bonding between CNF fibers. This could also explain the
lower rehydration ratio of scaffolds with more GelMA incorporated,
since more hydrogen bonding sites were occupied by GelMA molecules.
However, compared with CNF scaffolds, the incorporation of GelMA also
made the scaffolds more accessible to water with a high swelling ratio
at 1 min. This could be explained by the porous topography of the
GelMA incorporated scaffolds. The rapid rehydration kinetics could
be a beneficial feature in regard to both loading therapeutic drugs
and absorbing wound exudate in the use of the dried scaffold.
Figure 3
Water uptake
behavior of the freeze-dried scaffolds against time
scale. Swelling ratio of liquid N2 frozen and then freeze-dried
scaffolds printed from the inks of CNF hydrogel and CNF/GelMA hydrogels
with weight compositional ratios of 5:1, 2:1, and 9:10. The values
were recorded within a period of 24 h.
Water uptake
behavior of the freeze-dried scaffolds against time
scale. Swelling ratio of liquid N2 frozen and then freeze-dried
scaffolds printed from the inks of CNF hydrogel and CNF/GelMA hydrogels
with weight compositional ratios of 5:1, 2:1, and 9:10. The values
were recorded within a period of 24 h.
Mechanical Properties
Mechanical strength of scaffolds
plays a significant role in their applications to meet the bioenvironmental
needs. CNF, particularly prepared by TEMPO-mediated oxidation to introduce
carboxylates, undergoes ionic interaction and even dissociation in
aqueous media possessing high ionic strength. That will threaten the
stability of mechanical properties of scaffolds. In our previous study,
when CNF solely was printed from a relatively lower concentration
(∼0.7 wt %) hydrogel, the printed scaffolds dissociated into
water.[21] Thus, higher concentration of
CNF hydrogel was demanded for printing, and a dual-cross-linking approach
was developed to further increase the mechanical strength of the scaffolds.
Here, GelMA was incorporated together with CNF to form a hydrogel,
and its mechanical strength can be easily tuned by UV cross-linking.
Mechanical properties of the formulated hydrogels were evaluated by
the compression tests on both cast discs (Figure a) and printed scaffolds. As shown in Figure b, the compressive
Young’s modulus indicated clearly that UV cross-linked GelMA
condensed the structure and improved the rigidity of the hydrogel. Figure c shows the correlation
between compressive Young’s modulus and GelMA content for cast
discs and printed scaffolds. The compressive Young’s modulus
of the cast discs varied from 2.3 to 4.5 kPa as the content of GelMA
increased. The compressive Young’s modulus of CNF:GelMA=9:10
disc samples increased by 1-fold compared with that of the CNF discs.
This could be attributed to the increased solid content load[48] and cross-linked GelMA network. The increasing
trend of compressive Young’s modulus of the printed scaffolds
followed that of cast discs. This is also relevant to the result of
ink storage modulus after UV irradiation (Figure d): the G′ value
of the CNF/GelMA inks increased with addition of more GelMA, indicating
the increased strength of formulated hydrogels. The difference of
compressive Young’s modulus between the discs and the scaffolds
originated from the fractional porosity from a solid disc to a porous
scaffold. It was reported that fibroblasts start to respond by spreading
with the matrix at a stiffness range around 3 kPa.[49] Thus, the printed scaffolds with mechanical Young’s
modulus in the range of 2.5 to 5 kPa could be suitable for wound healing
application.[50] Furthermore, the local surface
stiffness of the printed scaffolds was monitored using AFM, as shown
in Figure d. The surface
Young’s modulus followed the same trend as the compressive
Young’s modulus of both cast discs and printed scaffolds. The
average surface Young’s modulus increased from 400 to 700 Pa
with increasing GelMA content. The surface stiffness of the printed
scaffolds of CNF/GelMA mainly corresponds to the cross-linking of
various contents of GelMA incorporated in the scaffolds.
Figure 4
(a) Images
of cast discs with formulated inks presenting from (i)
to (iv) with hydrogels of CNF, CNF:GelMA=5:1, CNF:GelMA=2:1, and CNF:GelMA=9:10,
respectively; (b) stress–strain plot of the formulated inks;
(c) relevantly increased compressive Young’s moduli among the
cast discs (labeled as “Disc”) and printed scaffolds
(labeled as “Scaffold”) after UV cross-linking; (d)
tunable local surface stiffness with changing GelMA amounts in ink
formulations measured by AFM measurements.
(a) Images
of cast discs with formulated inks presenting from (i)
to (iv) with hydrogels of CNF, CNF:GelMA=5:1, CNF:GelMA=2:1, and CNF:GelMA=9:10,
respectively; (b) stress–strain plot of the formulated inks;
(c) relevantly increased compressive Young’s moduli among the
cast discs (labeled as “Disc”) and printed scaffolds
(labeled as “Scaffold”) after UV cross-linking; (d)
tunable local surface stiffness with changing GelMA amounts in ink
formulations measured by AFM measurements.
3D CNF Matrix Support Survival, Adhesion, and Proliferation
of Fibroblast Cells
We next assessed the cytocompatibility
of the 3D printed scaffolds of CNF/GelMA, a prerequisite for the material
to be used for an ECM-mimicking matrix. First, we tested the functionality
of the 3D printed matrix in supporting cell attachment and survival.
Mouse 3T3 fibroblasts, a key cell component involved in wound healing,
were employed in the study. The cell adhesion capability was measured
using a crystal violet assay after 12 h of cell incubation in the
presence of the CNF matrix. It was found that, in comparison with
2D control coverslip samples, cells adhered slightly less on the CNF
matrix, whereas the incorporation of GelMA encouraged cell adhesion
(Figure a). This is
likely due to the incorporated GelMA containing motifs like arginine-glycine-aspartic
acid (RGD) sequences that could promote cell attachment.[24,51] In addition, after 24 h of cell incubation in the 3D matrix, cell
samples were examined with the MTT colorimetric assay to quantitatively
measure the capability of viable cells in metabolizing a dye [3-(4,5-dimethylthiozol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyl
tetrazolium bromide]. These results clearly demonstrated that the
3D printed scaffolds of CNF/GelMA had no adverse effect on cell viability
(Figure b). This is
consistent with our previous studies regarding the cytotoxicity test
of TEMPO-oxidized CNF that is well compatible with epithelial-derived
HeLa cells and hematopoietic-derived Jurkat cells.[33,38] Meanwhile, the cell viability tests demonstrated that the current
material process was also friendly to mouse fibroblasts.
Figure 5
3T3 cells were
incubated with the indicated 3D matrix in a density
of 1 × 105 cells per well. (a) The cell adhesion was
measured after 12 h of incubation using the crystal violet assay.
(b) The cell survival rate was measured after 24 h of incubation by
using the MTT assay. Bar = mean ± STDEV; n =
4. Matrix hydrogels presenting inks of CNF and CNF/GelMA with weight
compositional ratios of 5:1, 2:1, and 9:10.
3T3 cells were
incubated with the indicated 3D matrix in a density
of 1 × 105 cells per well. (a) The cell adhesion was
measured after 12 h of incubation using the crystal violet assay.
(b) The cell survival rate was measured after 24 h of incubation by
using the MTT assay. Bar = mean ± STDEV; n =
4. Matrix hydrogels presenting inks of CNF and CNF/GelMA with weight
compositional ratios of 5:1, 2:1, and 9:10.Moreover, we found that the 3D matrix supports cell proliferation
in a longer incubation period with the verification of cell growth
into the 3D matrix (Figures S1 and S2).
This agreed with the finding of the positive effect of CNF/GelMA on
cell proliferation as reported by Shin et al.[32] The results showed that after 3 days of post cell seeding, there
were twice the number of cells on samples of CNF:GelMA=5:1 compared
with CNF scaffolds (Figure ). Interestingly, higher contents of GelMA in samples of CNF:GelMA=2:1
and CNF:GelMA=9:10 had a weaker effect on enhancing cell proliferation.
This dose-dependent correlation between the proliferative activity
of the fibroblasts and the GelMA content suggests the importance of
controlling GelMA concentration in producing such a matrix for potent
fibroblast proliferation and further prompt wound healing (Figure ). As demonstrated
by our recent research,[21] when ink formulations
of the CNF single component were used, the proliferation of fibroblasts
was mainly regulated by the increased mechanical stiffness in the
CNF hydrogel. However, in this study, the incorporation of GelMA influenced
both the ink properties and the formed hydrogels, including cell adhesion
motifs (i.e., RGDs), modulus, topographical features, and porosity,
which have to be considered overall for cell migration and proliferation.
In particular, the fibroblast proliferation in the matrix of CNF:GelMA=9:10
was not promoted as much as in the matrix of CNF:GelMA=5:1, although
the matrix of CNF:GelMA=9:10 demonstrated the highest surface stiffness
among these four types of printed constructs. Thus, multiple factors
including both tunable mechanical stiffness and the topographical
morphology of printed CNF/GelMA should be accounted for regarding
the proliferative activity of 3T3 fibroblasts in these biomaterials.
As displayed in Figure , the topographical features became more porous on the printed struts
of CNF/GelMA as the content of GelMA increased. The wall-separated
microspores in the network on the strut surface of CNF:GelMA=9:10
were around 5–20 μm as measured in the sample after freeze-drying
(Figure t). After
swelling with water uptake, these pore dimensions are anticipated
to be almost comparable to the size of mouse3T3 fibroblast cells
(50–150 μm). It is suspected that the wall-like morphology
might interfere with the cell migration if the fibroblasts could likely
be entrapped in the network.[52]
Figure 6
3T3 cells were
incubated with the indicated 3D matrix in a density
of 1 × 105 cells per well. The cell proliferation
(a) and representative confocal images (b) were measured after 3 days
of incubation. Scale bar, 50 μm. Bar = mean ± STDEV; n = 4. *, p < 0.1; **, p < 0.01. Matrix hydrogels presenting inks of CNF and CNF/GelMA
with weight compositional ratios of 5:1, 2:1, and 9:10.
3T3 cells were
incubated with the indicated 3D matrix in a density
of 1 × 105 cells per well. The cell proliferation
(a) and representative confocal images (b) were measured after 3 days
of incubation. Scale bar, 50 μm. Bar = mean ± STDEV; n = 4. *, p < 0.1; **, p < 0.01. Matrix hydrogels presenting inks of CNF and CNF/GelMA
with weight compositional ratios of 5:1, 2:1, and 9:10.In summary, the nontoxicity and the promoted proliferative
activity
of 3T3 fibroblasts in the CNF/GelMA scaffolds provide good opportunities
for their safe application in wound healing therapy.
Conclusions
This study presents a novel low-concentration ink formulation based
on 1.0 w/v % TEMPO-oxidized CNF and up to 1.0 w/v % GelMA for extrusion-based
3D printing of nanocellulose hydrogel scaffolds. The molecular interaction
between these two biopolymers of TEMPO-oxidized CNF and GelMA modified
the rheological properties of the CNF. More importantly, the presence
of TEMPO-oxidized CNF facilitated the UV cross-linking of GelMA incorporated
in ultralow concentrations in the formulated bioinks. By direct ink
writing assisted by UV postcuring, high-resolution scaffolds of CNF/GelMA
were successfully printed, and these scaffolds demonstrated high fidelity
and stability. By tuning the compositional ratio between CNF and GelMA,
the compressive Young’s modulus and local surface stiffness
could be well tuned. The developed ink formulations are noncytotoxic
and cytocompatible with mouse 3T3 fibroblasts. Furthermore, ink formulations
of CNF incorporated with GelMA, particularly with CNF/GelMA ratios
of 2:1 and 5:1, promoted the proliferative activity of 3T3 fibroblasts
when compared with the plain CNF hydrogel. Owing to the influences
of both surface stiffness and topographical features in the biomaterials,
these scaffolds of CNF:GelMA=5:1 showed outstanding performance on
promoting fibroblast proliferation. In summary, the developed low-concentration
ink formulations of CNF/GelMA present a facile yet effective approach
to fabricate hydrogel scaffolds with tunable mechanical strength that
show great potential toward such applications as wound healing and
soft tissue regeneration.
Authors: Tony Yeung; Penelope C Georges; Lisa A Flanagan; Beatrice Marg; Miguelina Ortiz; Makoto Funaki; Nastaran Zahir; Wenyu Ming; Valerie Weaver; Paul A Janmey Journal: Cell Motil Cytoskeleton Date: 2005-01
Authors: Thomas Billiet; Elien Gevaert; Thomas De Schryver; Maria Cornelissen; Peter Dubruel Journal: Biomaterials Date: 2013-10-07 Impact factor: 12.479
Authors: Huanan Wang; Morten B Hansen; Dennis W P M Löwik; Jan C M van Hest; Yubao Li; John A Jansen; Sander C G Leeuwenburgh Journal: Adv Mater Date: 2011-03-10 Impact factor: 30.849
Authors: Jason W Nichol; Sandeep T Koshy; Hojae Bae; Chang M Hwang; Seda Yamanlar; Ali Khademhosseini Journal: Biomaterials Date: 2010-04-24 Impact factor: 12.479
Authors: Luiz E Bertassoni; Juliana C Cardoso; Vijayan Manoharan; Ana L Cristino; Nupura S Bhise; Wesleyan A Araujo; Pinar Zorlutuna; Nihal E Vrana; Amir M Ghaemmaghami; Mehmet R Dokmeci; Ali Khademhosseini Journal: Biofabrication Date: 2014-04-03 Impact factor: 9.954
Authors: Xue Zhang; Maria Morits; Christopher Jonkergouw; Ari Ora; Juan José Valle-Delgado; Muhammad Farooq; Rubina Ajdary; Siqi Huan; Markus Linder; Orlando Rojas; Mika Henrikki Sipponen; Monika Österberg Journal: Biomacromolecules Date: 2020-02-11 Impact factor: 6.988
Authors: Liliang Ouyang; James P K Armstrong; Yiyang Lin; Jonathan P Wojciechowski; Charlotte Lee-Reeves; Daniel Hachim; Kun Zhou; Jason A Burdick; Molly M Stevens Journal: Sci Adv Date: 2020-09-18 Impact factor: 14.136
Authors: Joseph Rey H Sta Agueda; Qiyi Chen; Reymark D Maalihan; Jingbo Ren; Ítalo G M da Silva; Nathaniel P Dugos; Eugene B Caldona; Rigoberto C Advincula Journal: MRS Commun Date: 2021-04-26 Impact factor: 2.566