| Literature DB >> 30740262 |
Lieuwe Biewenga1, Thangavelu Saravanan1, Andreas Kunzendorf1, Jan-Ytzen van der Meer1, Tjaard Pijning2, Pieter G Tepper1, Ronald van Merkerk1, Simon J Charnock3, Andy-Mark W H Thunnissen4, Gerrit J Poelarends1.
Abstract
Chiral γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA) analogues represent abundantly prescribed drugs, which are broadly applied as anticonvulsants, as antidepressants, and for the treatment of neuropathic pain. Here we report a one-pot two-step biocatalytic cascade route for synthesis of the pharmaceutically relevant enantiomers of γ-nitrobutyric acids, starting from simple precursors (acetaldehyde and nitroalkenes), using a tailor-made highly enantioselective artificial "Michaelase" (4-oxalocrotonate tautomerase mutant L8Y/M45Y/F50A), an aldehyde dehydrogenase with a broad non-natural substrate scope, and a cofactor recycling system. We also report a three-step chemoenzymatic cascade route for the efficient chemical reduction of enzymatically prepared γ-nitrobutyric acids into GABA analogues in one pot, achieving high enantiopurity (e.r. up to 99:1) and high overall yields (up to 70%). This chemoenzymatic methodology offers a step-economic alternative route to important pharmaceutically active GABA analogues, and highlights the exciting opportunities available for combining chemocatalysts, natural enzymes, and designed artificial biocatalysts in multistep syntheses.Entities:
Year: 2019 PMID: 30740262 PMCID: PMC6366683 DOI: 10.1021/acscatal.8b04299
Source DB: PubMed Journal: ACS Catal Impact factor: 13.084
Figure 1Chemoenzymatic cascade synthesis of pharmaceutically active GABA analogues. (A) Envisioned (chemo)enzymatic cascade synthesis of pharmaceutically active GABA analogues. Abbreviations: 4-OT*, newly engineered 4-OT variant that functions as a highly enantioselective artificial “Michaelase”; ALDH, aldehyde dehydrogenase; NR, nitroreductase. (B) Structures of GABA and its analogues pregabalin, phenibut, baclofen, and fluorophenibut.
Figure 2Effect of cosolvents on the enantioselectivity of the enzymatic Michael-type addition reaction. Enantiopurity of 3a (as the percentage of the S-enantiomer) in the 4-OT M45Y/F50A catalyzed addition of 1 to 2a performed in the presence of increasing concentrations of different cosolvents.
Figure 3Progress curves of Michael-type additions catalyzed by different 4-OT variants. (a) Addition of 1 (150 mM) to 2a (5 mM) in 20 mM sodium phosphate buffer (pH 6.5) and 5% (v/v) DMSO. Different 4-OT mutants were used as a catalyst at a concentration of 100 μM. YA: 4-OT M45Y/F50A, FYA: 4-OT L8F/M45Y/F50A, WYYA: 4-OT I2W/L8Y/M45Y/F50A, MYYA: 4-OT I2M/L8Y/M45Y/F50A, YYA: 4-OT L8Y/M45Y/F50A. (b) Addition of 1 (65 mM) to 2c (1.3 mM) in 20 mM sodium phosphate buffer (pH 6.5) and 45% (v/v) DMSO. Different 4-OT mutants were used as a catalyst at a concentration of 18 μM. YA: 4-OT M45Y/F50A, YYA: 4-OT L8Y/M45Y/F50A.
4-OT L8Y/M45Y/F50A Catalyzed Michael-Type Additions of 1 to 2a–d Yielding 3a–da
Assay conditions: reaction mixtures consisted of 150 mM 1 (synthesis of 3a) or 50 mM 1 (synthesis of 3b–d), 3 mM 2a, 1.3 mM 2c or 2 mM 2b and 2d in 20 mM sodium phosphate buffer, pH 6.5. The reaction volume was 12.8 mL (synthesis of 3a) or 60 mL (synthesis of 3b–d). 1.4 mol % of 4-OT (compared to concentration nitroalkene) was used, except for entry 1 (2.5 mol %) and entry 3 (2.15 mol %).
For 3a, the e.r. was determined by GC with a chiral stationary phase. For 3b and 3c, the enzymatic product was first converted into the corresponding ethylene glycol acetal, of which the e.r. was determined by HPLC with a chiral stationary phase. For 3d, the e.r. was directly determined by HPLC with a chiral stationary phase. The absolute configuration was determined by comparison to literature data.[17,25]
Figure 4Crystal structure of the newly engineered 4-OT L8Y/M45Y/F50A mutant. (a) Overlay of the crystal structures of mutant M45Y/F50A with bound nitrostyrene (2b, in light gray color, PDB entry: 5CLO) and mutant L8Y/M45Y/F50A (in orange color, this work). The extra L8Y mutation of the triple mutant has the tyrosine side chain lying above a hydrophobic pocket where nitrostyrene (2b) is bound in the double mutant, close to the catalytic proline residue (Pro-1). (b) Close-up view at a similar orientation, with the surface representation of the L8Y/M45Y/F50A mutant added, showing that nitrostyrene (2b) would snugly fit in the hydrophobic pocket.
One-Pot Two-Step Biocatalytic Enantioselective Synthesis of γ-Nitrobutyric Acids 4a–da
Michael-type addition of 1 to 2a–d catalyzed by 4-OT L8Y/M45Y/F50A or 4-OT A33D to form either S-3a and R-3b–d or R-3a and S-3b–d respectively, followed by aldehyde oxidation catalyzed by PRO-ALDH(003), using PRO-NOX(009) for cofactor recycling, to form either S-4a and R-4b–d or R-4a and S-4b–d. The reaction mixtures consisted of 50 mM 1, 3 mM 2a or 4 mM 2b–d in 100 mM sodium phosphate buffer pH 7.3 and 10% (v/v) ethanol. Five mol % of 4-OT (compared to concentration nitroalkene) was used, except for entry 6 (1.5 mol %) and entry 7 (3 mol %). PRO-ALDH(003) was added to a final concentration of 0.5 mg/mL, PRO-NOX(009) was added to a final concentration of 1 mg/mL. The concentration NAD+ was 8 mM (4a) or 10 mM (4b–d). The amounts of applied cofactor were adjusted such that short reaction times and high conversions were achieved.
Monitored by UV spectroscopy.
Monitored by HPLC.
Products 4a–d were esterified and the e.r. was determined by GC or HPLC with a chiral stationary phase.
One-Pot Three-Step Chemoenzymatic Cascade Synthesis of Pharmaceuticals 5a–da
Michael-type addition of 1 to 2a–d catalyzed by 4-OT L8Y/M45Y/F50A to form S-3a and R-3b–d, followed by aldehyde oxidation catalyzed by PRO-ALDH(003), using PRO-NOX(009) for cofactor recycling, to form S-4a and R-4b–d, followed by nitro reduction catalyzed by nickel boride to form S-5a and R-5b–d. The reaction mixtures consisted of 50 mM 1, 3 mM 2a or 4 mM 2b–d in 100 mM sodium phosphate buffer pH 7.3 and 10% (v/v) ethanol. Five mol % of 4-OT (compared to concentration of nitroalkene) was used; PRO-ALDH(003) was added to a final concentration of 0.5 mg/mL; PRO-NOX(009) was added to a final concentration of 1 mg/mL; 0.5 mM of NAD+ was added; 40 mM of NiCl2 and 40 mM of NaBH4 were used. Because of the poor stability of nickel boride in aqueous buffer, a 10-fold excess of this reagent (40 mM versus 3–4 mM 2a–d) is required to achieve high conversion.
Monitored by UV spectroscopy.
Monitored by HPLC.
Monitored by TLC.
Purified by cation exchange chromatography.
Products 5a–d were derivatized using Nα-(2,4-dinitro-5-fluorophenyl)-l-valinamide, and the e.r. of the corresponding diastereomers was determined by HPLC with an achiral stationary phase. Notably, the e.r. of product 5a is likely to be 99:1; however, because a minor contaminant from the derivatizing agent has the same retention time as the R enantiomer of product 5a, the e.r. for product 5a is cautiously reported as 98:2, consistent with the observed peaks in the HPLC chromatogram.