Literature DB >> 307367

In vitro susceptibility of Haemophilus influenzae to sulfamethoxazole-trimethoprim and cefaclor, cephalexin, and cephradine.

R Sinai, S Hammerberg, M I Marks, C H Pai.   

Abstract

Sulfamethoxazole-trimethoprim and three oral cephalosporins, cefaclor, cephalexin, and cephradine, were evaluated in vitro as possible alternatives to chloramphenicol in the treatment of non-central nervous system infections due to ampicillin-resistant Haemophilus influenzae. Sixty-four isolates of H. influenzae, including 31 beta-lactamase-positive strains, were tested by the agar dilution method. All strains were inhibited by 0.78/0.039 mug sulfamethoxazole-trimethoprim per ml and by 0.78 mug of chloramphenicol per ml. At 6.25 mug/ml, 100, 11, and 3% of all strains were inhibited by cefaclor, cephalexin, and cephradine, respectively. Thus, on the basis of drug concentrations presumably achievable in serum, 100% of strains were susceptible to sulfamethoxazole-trimethoprim, chloramphenicol, and cefaclor. However, a considerable inoculum effect was noted with both beta-lactamase-positive and -negative strains, when tested with sulfamethoxazole-trimethoprim; the minimal inhibitory concentrations of cefaclor were only slightly affected. Also, synergistic effects of sulfamethoxazole-trimethoprim, sulfamethoxazole-erythromycin, and sulfamethoxazole-cefaclor were seen when combinations were tested against both beta-lactamase-positive and -negative strains, as determined by minimal inhibitory concentrations measured by the broth dilution method and by killing curve analyses. These results support further evaluation of these combinations and of cefaclor alone for the treatment of non-central nervous system infections due to H. influenzae.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1978        PMID: 307367      PMCID: PMC352345          DOI: 10.1128/AAC.13.5.861

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother        ISSN: 0066-4804            Impact factor:   5.191


  9 in total

1.  Comparison of in vitro activity of cephalexin, cephradine, and cefaclor.

Authors:  N J Bill; J A Washington
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1977-03       Impact factor: 5.191

2.  In vitro comparison of cefoxitin, cefamandole, cephalexin, and cephalothin.

Authors:  T C Eickhoff; J M Ehret
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1976-06       Impact factor: 5.191

3.  In vitro activity of clindamycin and other antimicrobials against gram-positive bacteria and Hemophilus influenzae.

Authors:  M I Marks
Journal:  Can Med Assoc J       Date:  1975-01-25       Impact factor: 8.262

4.  Rapid detection of ampicillin-resistant Haemophilus influenzae and their susceptibility to sixteen antibiotics.

Authors:  R B Kammer; D A Preston; J R Turner; L C Hawley
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1975-07       Impact factor: 5.191

5.  Susceptibility of Haemophilus influenzae isolates from blood and cerebrospinal fluid to ampicillin, chloramphenicol, and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole.

Authors:  J E McGowan; P M Terry; A J Nahmias
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1976-01       Impact factor: 5.191

6.  Comparison of methods for assessing in vitro antibiotic synergism against Pseudomonas and Serratia.

Authors:  R J Weinstein; L S Young; W L Hewitt
Journal:  J Lab Clin Med       Date:  1975-11

7.  Hemophilus influenzae type B susceptibility to 17 antibiotics.

Authors:  B B Emerson; A L Smith; A L Harding; D H Smith
Journal:  J Pediatr       Date:  1975-04       Impact factor: 4.406

8.  Iodometric detection of Haemophilus influenzae beta-lactamase: rapid presumptive test for ampicillin resistance.

Authors:  B W Catlin
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1975-03       Impact factor: 5.191

9.  In vitro susceptibility of Haemophilus influenzae to trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole.

Authors:  L A Kirven; C Thornsberry
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1974-12       Impact factor: 5.191

  9 in total
  15 in total

1.  Inoculum effect of β-lactam antibiotics.

Authors:  Justin R Lenhard; Zackery P Bulman
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  2019-10-01       Impact factor: 5.790

Review 2.  Haemophilus influenzae: antibiotic susceptibility.

Authors:  C A Needham
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  1988-04       Impact factor: 26.132

3.  Cefaclor: summary of clinical experience.

Authors:  R B Kammer; L J Short
Journal:  Infection       Date:  1979       Impact factor: 3.553

4.  Susceptibility of Haemophilus influenzae type b to cefaclor and influence of inoculum size.

Authors:  R M Levin; P H Azimi; M G Dunphy
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1982-11       Impact factor: 5.191

5.  Comparative susceptibility of Haemophilus species to cefaclor, cefamandole, and five other cephalosporins and ampicillin, chloramphenicol, and tetracycline.

Authors:  C Watanakunakorn; C Glotzbecker
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1979-06       Impact factor: 5.191

6.  [In vitro activity of cefaclor against Haemophilus influenzae in comparison to various oral chemotherapeutic agents (author's transl)].

Authors:  I Braveny
Journal:  Infection       Date:  1979       Impact factor: 3.553

7.  Cefaclor in the treatment of susceptible infections in infants and children.

Authors:  M J Spencer
Journal:  Infection       Date:  1979       Impact factor: 3.553

8.  Broth microdilution testing of Haemophilus influenzae with haemophilus test medium versus lysed horse blood broth. Canadian Haemophilus Study Group.

Authors:  S R Scriver; D E Low; A E Simor; B Toye; A McGeer; R Jaeger
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1992-09       Impact factor: 5.948

9.  In vitro activity of orally administered antimicrobial agents against Haemophilus influenzae recovered from children monitored longitudinally in a group day-care center.

Authors:  M J George; B Kitch; F W Henderson; P H Gilligan
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1991-10       Impact factor: 5.191

10.  Influence of growth medium and supplement on growth of Haemophilus influenzae and on antibacterial activity of several antibiotics.

Authors:  M G Bergeron; P Simard; P Provencher
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1987-04       Impact factor: 5.948

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.