David B Copithorne1, Charles L Rice2,3. 1. Canadian Centre for Activity and Aging, School of Kinesiology, Faculty of Health Sciences, The University of Western Ontario, London, ON, Canada. dcopitho@uwo.ca. 2. Canadian Centre for Activity and Aging, School of Kinesiology, Faculty of Health Sciences, The University of Western Ontario, London, ON, Canada. 3. Department of Anatomy and Cell Biology, Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, The University of Western Ontario, London, ON, N6A 3K7, Canada.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Blood flow restriction (BFR) with low-intensity (< 30% of 1 repetition maximum strength) muscle contraction has been used chronically (> 4 weeks) to enhance resistance training. However, mechanisms underlying muscle adaptations following BFR are not well understood. To explore changes related to chronic BFR adaptations, the current study used blood flow occlusion (BFO) during an acute bout of low-intensity isometric fatiguing contractions to assess peripheral (muscle) factors affected. METHODS: Ten males completed separate fatiguing elbow flexor protocols to failure; one with BFO and one with un-restricted blood flow (FF). Baseline, post-task failure, and 30 min of recovery measures of voluntary and involuntary contractile properties were compared. RESULTS: BFO had greater impairment of intrinsic measures compared with FF, despite FF lasting 80% longer. Following task failure, maximal voluntary contraction and 50 Hz torque decreased in both protocols (~ 60% from baseline). Voluntary activation decreased ~ 11% from baseline at failure following both protocols, but recovered at a faster rate following BFO, whereas MVC recovered to ~ 90% of baseline in both protocols. The 10/50 Hz torque ratio was decreased by ~ 68% and ~ 21% from baseline, for BFO and FF, respectively (P < 0.01). 50 Hz half-relaxation-time (HRT) was significantly longer immediately following BFO (~ 107% greater than baseline), with no change following FF. CONCLUSIONS: Thus, greater peripheral fatigue that recovers at a similar rate compared to conventional exercise is likely driving muscle adaptations observed with chronic BFR exercise. Likely BFO alters energy demand and supply of working muscle similar to chronic BFR, but is exaggerated in this paradigm.
PURPOSE: Blood flow restriction (BFR) with low-intensity (< 30% of 1 repetition maximum strength) muscle contraction has been used chronically (> 4 weeks) to enhance resistance training. However, mechanisms underlying muscle adaptations following BFR are not well understood. To explore changes related to chronic BFR adaptations, the current study used blood flow occlusion (BFO) during an acute bout of low-intensity isometric fatiguing contractions to assess peripheral (muscle) factors affected. METHODS: Ten males completed separate fatiguing elbow flexor protocols to failure; one with BFO and one with un-restricted blood flow (FF). Baseline, post-task failure, and 30 min of recovery measures of voluntary and involuntary contractile properties were compared. RESULTS:BFO had greater impairment of intrinsic measures compared with FF, despite FF lasting 80% longer. Following task failure, maximal voluntary contraction and 50 Hz torque decreased in both protocols (~ 60% from baseline). Voluntary activation decreased ~ 11% from baseline at failure following both protocols, but recovered at a faster rate following BFO, whereas MVC recovered to ~ 90% of baseline in both protocols. The 10/50 Hz torque ratio was decreased by ~ 68% and ~ 21% from baseline, for BFO and FF, respectively (P < 0.01). 50 Hz half-relaxation-time (HRT) was significantly longer immediately following BFO (~ 107% greater than baseline), with no change following FF. CONCLUSIONS: Thus, greater peripheral fatigue that recovers at a similar rate compared to conventional exercise is likely driving muscle adaptations observed with chronic BFR exercise. Likely BFO alters energy demand and supply of working muscle similar to chronic BFR, but is exaggerated in this paradigm.
Authors: Murat Karabulut; Joel T Cramer; Takashi Abe; Yoshiaki Sato; Michael G Bemben Journal: J Electromyogr Kinesiol Date: 2009-07-28 Impact factor: 2.368
Authors: Samuel Verges; Nicola A Maffiuletti; Hugo Kerherve; Nicolas Decorte; Bernard Wuyam; Guillaume Y Millet Journal: J Appl Physiol (1985) Date: 2008-08-28
Authors: Mikhail Santos Cerqueira; Daniel Germano Maciel; Jean Artur Mendonça Barboza; Christoph Centner; Maria Lira; Rafael Pereira; Wouber Hérickson De Brito Vieira Journal: J Athl Train Date: 2022-04-01 Impact factor: 3.824