| Literature DB >> 30732586 |
Rick Masonbrink1,2, Tom R Maier1, Usha Muppirala1,2, Arun S Seetharam1,2, Etienne Lord3, Parijat S Juvale1, Jeremy Schmutz4,5, Nathan T Johnson6, Dmitry Korkin6,7, Melissa G Mitchum8, Benjamin Mimee3, Sebastian Eves-van den Akker9, Matthew Hudson10, Andrew J Severin11, Thomas J Baum1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Heterodera glycines, commonly referred to as the soybean cyst nematode (SCN), is an obligatory and sedentary plant parasite that causes over a billion-dollar yield loss to soybean production annually. Although there are genetic determinants that render soybean plants resistant to certain nematode genotypes, resistant soybean cultivars are increasingly ineffective because their multi-year usage has selected for virulent H. glycines populations. The parasitic success of H. glycines relies on the comprehensive re-engineering of an infection site into a syncytium, as well as the long-term suppression of host defense to ensure syncytial viability. At the forefront of these complex molecular interactions are effectors, the proteins secreted by H. glycines into host root tissues. The mechanisms of effector acquisition, diversification, and selection need to be understood before effective control strategies can be developed, but the lack of an annotated genome has been a major roadblock.Entities:
Keywords: Effector; Evolution; Genome; Heterodera glycines; SCN; Soybean cyst nematode; Tandem duplication
Mesh:
Year: 2019 PMID: 30732586 PMCID: PMC6367775 DOI: 10.1186/s12864-019-5485-8
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Genomics ISSN: 1471-2164 Impact factor: 3.969
Fig. 1Phylogenetic relationships of species related to H. glycines. Phylogenetic tree of BUSCO genes with synteny representing the relatedness of each species. Synteny is inversely correlated with phylogenetic distance, as syntenic multiplicons decrease from hundreds in Globodera species, to zero in B. xylophilus, Green contigs denote H. glycines, while blue represent the respective related species. Node labels represent node ages. Pertinent comparative genome stats are found in the footer
Fig. 2DOG boxes in dorsal gland effector-like loci. a Centered alignment of DOG boxes found in H. glycines promoters using HOMER. b DOG-box positional enrichment upstream of promoters in DOG-box genes and a lack of enrichment for 128 random gene promoters. c Increased frequency of DOG boxes in promoters in a small subset of genes compared to random promoters and likelihood of DOG box prediction of secretion signal peptide
Fig. 3SNP density (a) and expression (b) of effector genes and gene copy number variants. Effectors found within repetitive regions were not significantly associated with SNP changes, although both effectors and secreted genes in any region of the genome were frequently up and downregulated in expression. Significance was calculated with Fisher’s exact tests in the GeneOverlap R package, and significance at <0.05 is *, <0.01 is **. Expression is represented as a log fold change of expression in a comparison of pre-parasitic and parasitic J2 nematodes
Fig. 4Most highly duplicated scaffolds in the H. glycines genome colocalizing with effector genes. Scaffold ticks signify 50kb increments along scaffolds (green), High correlations were found between regions containing transposon elements and tandem duplications. Effectors were frequently duplicated within these regions. HGT events were evenly distributed across scaffolds, while upregulated and downregulated expression was frequently associated with variable up and down regulation of expression
Fig. 5SNP density and expression of effector genes and gene categories. Effectors found within repetitive regions were not significantly associated with SNP changes, although both effectors and secreted genes in any region of the genome were frequently up and downregulated in expression. Significance was calculated with Fisher’s exact tests in the GeneOverlap R package, and significance at < 0.05 is *, < 0.01 is **. Statistical comparisons were peformed between gene categories and high SNP density, low SNP density, zero SNPs, high expression, and low expression. Expression is represented as a log fold change of expression in a comparison of pre-parasitic and parasitic J2 nematodes