Literature DB >> 30732444

Does Clot Burden Score on Baseline T2*-MRI Impact Clinical Outcome in Acute Ischemic Stroke Treated with Mechanical Thrombectomy?

Imad Derraz1, Romain Bourcier2, Marc Soudant3, Sébastien Soize4, Wagih Ben Hassen5, Gabriella Hossu6, Frederic Clarencon7, Anne Laure Derelle1, Marie Tisserand8, Helene Raoult9, Laurence Legrand5, Serge Bracard1, Catherine Oppenheim5, Olivier Naggara5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
PURPOSE: A long clot, defined by a low (0-6) clot burden score (CBS) assessed by T2*-MR sequence, is associated with worse clinical outcome after intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) for acute ischemic stroke than is a small clot (CBS, 7-10). The added benefit of mechanical thrombectomy (MT) might be higher in patients with long clot. The aim of this pre-specified post hoc analysis of the THRombectomie des Artères CErebrales (THRACE) trial was to assess the association between T2*-CBS, successful recanalization and clinical outcome.
METHODS: Of 414 patients randomized in the THRACE trial, 281 patients were included in this analysis. Associations between T2*-CBS and clinical outcome on the modified Rankin Scale (mRS) at 3 months were tested.
RESULTS: High T2*-CBS, i.e., small clot, was associated with a shift toward better outcome on the mRS; proportional odds ratio (POR) per point CBS was 1.19 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.05 to 1.34) in the whole population, 1.34 (95% CI, 1.13 to 1.59) in IVT group, and 1.04 (95% CI, 0.87 to 1.23) in IVTMT group. After adjustment for baseline prognostic variables, the effect of the full scale T2*-CBS was not statistically significant in the whole population and for the IVTMT group but remains significant for the IVT group (POR, 1.32; 95% CI, 1.11 to 1.58).
CONCLUSION: s A small clot, as assessed using T2*-CBS, is associated with improved outcome and may be used as a prognostic marker. Despite the worst outcome with long clot, the relative benefit of MT over IVT seemed to increase with low T2*-CBS and longer clot.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Endovascular recanalization; Ischemic stroke; Magnetic resonance imaging; Thrombosis

Year:  2019        PMID: 30732444      PMCID: PMC6372898          DOI: 10.5853/jos.2018.01921

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Stroke        ISSN: 2287-6391            Impact factor:   6.967


Introduction

Recanalization of the arterial occlusion is the cornerstone of treatment in acute ischemic stroke (AIS) patients. Several randomized clinical trials (RCTs) [1-7] and an individual patient data meta-analysis [8] have recently shown that mechanical thrombectomy (MT) combined with standard treatment (including intravenous thrombolysis [IVT]) was superior to standard treatment alone, with higher rates of reperfusion, more frequent favorable functional outcome, and lower 3 months mortality, for severe AIS caused by large-vessel occlusion (LVO) in the anterior circulation. The cumulative evidence from these studies resulted in the modification of practice guidelines and profound changes in worldwide stroke care organization [9]. Despite its compelling efficacy, up to half of AIS-LVO patients do not regain functional independence after MT [8]. This unfavorable outcome is largely attributable to unsuccessful mechanical recanalization [1-4,7]. Amongst factors influencing recanalization success, clot length is an important determinant [10-12], that was scarcely assessed in the recent RCTs. Indeed, if patients were included in case of LVO on computed tomography angiography (CTA), only few studies [13,14] assessed clot length using the CTA-defined clot burden score (CTA-CBS). These analyses demonstrated a direct link between clot length, likelihood of recanalization, final infarct volumes, and 3-month neurological outcome. Brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), using the T2*-MRI sequence, is a powerful tool to identify thrombus in AIS patients, based on the presence of a susceptibility vessel sign (SVS) [15,16]. Clot length is included in the T2*-CBS [17], in which a lower score reflects longer thrombus. T2*-CBS was recently used after IVT or MT, as a predictor of recanalization and functional outcome [17,18]. However, as for CTA-CBS [19], these studies were mainly retrospective and no adjustment was performed for crucial baseline prognostic variables such as initial National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score or recanalization results. With more than 300 patients included with pre-treatment MRI, the THRombectomie des Artères CErebrales (THRACE) trial (ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01062698) offers a unique opportunity to study the associations between T2*-CBS, successful recanalization rate and functional independence. The purpose of this prespecified post hoc analysis of the THRACE trial was to determine the relation between T2*-CBS and the effect on endovascular treatment and neurological improvement in AIS-LVO patients.

Methods

Study design

THRACE was a randomized controlled trial done in 26 centers in France. Study design and protocol have been previously detailed [7]. AIS-LVO patients were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive either IVT alone (IVT group) or IVT+MT (IVTMT group). IVT had to be started within 4 hours and MT within 5 hours of symptom onset. Occlusions had to be confirmed by CTA or magnetic resonance angiography (MRA). Before randomization, written informed consent was obtained from all patients or their legal representatives. The study protocol was approved by the Comité de Protection des Personnes (CPP) III Nord Est Ethics Committee and the research boards of the participating centers. No data were reported on thrombus characteristics obtained on admission brain MRI.

Outcomes measures

The primary outcome in the THRACE trial was the proportion of patients with a score of 0–2 on the modified Rankin Scale (mRS), indicating functional independence, at 3 months after the intervention. Secondary outcomes nonexhaustively included, successful recanalization, defined as a modified Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction (mTICI) score ≥2b [20] in the IVTMT group, and the NIHSS score at 24 hours in all patients. Clinical assessments were done by vascular neurologists who were not masked to the treatment to which the patients had been allocated.

Image analysis

MRI images and angiograms before and after MT were reviewed by four experienced neuroradiologists, who were masked to randomization group and patient clinical outcome. Baseline examinations included the determination of the Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score (ASPECTS) [21] on diffusion weighted imaging (DWI) sequence and the location of the arterial occlusion by MRA. After initial training, two experienced observers from the core imaging committee searched for SVS, that is, a hypointense signal on T2* within a vascular cistern, exceeding the size of the homologous contralateral arterial diameter. If present, an appropriate T2*-CBS was assigned according to the methods of Legrand et al. [17] T2*-CBS is a 10-point scoring system used to define the extent of thrombus in the anterior circulation (Figure 1). Because susceptibility artifact at the skull base prevents evaluation of the infraclinoid internal carotid artery (ICA), this segment was not analyzed and 3 points were assigned to the supraclinoid ICA level, for consistency with the CTA-CBS. A score of 10 implies clot absence. A score of 0 implies complete multisegment vessel occlusion by a long clot. T2*-CBS was subsequently dichotomized using a >6-point cut-off (0–6: long clot vs. 7–10: small clot), according to and for comparison with CTA-CBS studies [13].
Figure 1.

The T2*-clot burden score (T2*-CBS). (A) A score of 10 is normal, implying absence of susceptibility vessel sign (SVS) on T2*. Three points (as indicated) are subtracted for SVS found in the supraclinoid internal carotid artery (ICA), 2 points for SVS in each of the proximal and distal halves of the middle cerebral artery trunk (M1), 1 point for SVS in the A1–A4 segment and 2 points for SVS in the M2–M4 branches. A score of 0 implying complete multisegment vessel occlusion. (B) Patient 1, distal occlusion with T2*-CBS=9 (SVS in 1 left M2 branch). (C, D) Patient 2, proximal occlusion with T2*-CBS=3 (SVS in right supraclinoid ICA, proximal and distal halves of M1).

Statistical analysis

All primary outcome analyses were performed according to the intention-to-treat principle. For this study, the primary effect variable was the proportional adjusted common odds ratio for a shift in the direction of better outcome on the 3-month mRS. The association between full-scale or dichotomized T2*-CBS (0–6 vs. 7–10) with shift in the direction of better outcome on the mRS was assessed using ordinal logistic regression respectively. For all outcome parameters, two models were generated as previously used [13]. Model A contained the T2*-CBS variable and treatment. In model B, the main prognostic baseline variables were added: age, stroke severity (NIHSS score), glycemia, and ASPECTS score. An interaction term of treatment allocation with T2*-CBS was added to the both unadjusted and adjusted models to assess whether T2*-CBS was a treatment effect modifier. The models with and without added interaction term (nested models) were compared using the chi-square test. Patient characteristics are reported for groups with and without SVS and patient with long (T2*-CBS 0–6) and small clot (T2*-CBS 7–10). Continuous variables were compared with Student t-test, a Mann-Whitney test, or Median test, as appropriate. Categorical variables were compared using chisquare or Fisher exact test, as appropriate. For all statistical analyses, P<0.05 was considered statistically significant. All statistical analyses were done with SAS/STAT version 9.4 (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA).

Results

Patient characteristics

Among 414 patients randomized in the THRACE trial (Figure 2), initial imaging work-up was performed using MRI in 153 of 208 patients (74%) in the IVT group and 148 of 204 patients (73%) in the IVTMT group (P=0.83). Of these, 20 patients were excluded leaving 281 patients for analysis in the present study. Baseline characteristics are summarized in Supplementary Table 1. Sociodemographic characteristics, comorbidities, and baseline NIHSS did not differ between IVT and IVTMT groups, nor delays from symptom onset to IVT initiation or to randomization.
Figure 2.

Flow chart study. CT, computerized tomography; MRI, magnetic resonance imaging; CBS indicates clot burden score; mRS, modified Rankin Scale; IVT, intravenous thrombolysis; IVTMT, intravenous thrombolysis mechanical thrombectomy.

Baseline characteristics according to T2*-CBS group

Among 281 patients included in 19 centers, 234 (83.3%) demonstrated presence of SVS, 118 (50.4%) in the IVT group, and 116 (49.6%) in the IVTMT group. Overall, the median T2*-CBS was 7 (interquartile range, 6 to 8), similar in IVT and IVTMT groups (P=0.38). After dichotomizing the T2*-CBS, 111 patients (39.5%) had a long clot and 170 (60.5%) a small clot. Patients with a long clot were significantly older, had a lower DWI-ASPECTS score, more often had diabetes mellitus or were active smokers at baseline (Table 1).
Table 1.

Baseline patient characteristics according to dichotomized T2*-CBS groups

CharacteristicT2*-CBS (7–10)T2*-CBS (0–6)P
Number170111
IVTMT randomization group87 (51.2)52 (46.8)0.48[*]
Undergo IVTMT57 (33.5)43 (38.7)0.37[*]
Age (yr)61.8±14.265.4±13.40.01[]
 ≤70109 (64.1)50 (45.0)0.002[*]
 >7061 (35.9)61 (55.0)
Sex0.32[*]
 Male93 (54.7)54 (48.6)
 Female77 (45.3)57 (51.4)
Comorbidities
 Hypertension84 (49.7)57 (52.3)0.67[*]
 Diabetes mellitus20 (11.8)5 (4.6)0.04[*]
 History of stroke9 (5.5)9 (8.3)0.37[*]
 Hypercholesterolemia79 (53.0)50 (50.5)0.70[*]
 Current tobacco use43 (28.3)14 (14.1)0.009[*]
 Coronary disease20 (12.4)20 (18.7)0.16[*]
Etiology of cerebral infarction0.41[*]
 Large-artery atherosclerosis25 (15.3)13 (13.0)
 Cardioembolism64 (39.3)51 (51.0)
 Small-vessel occlusion1 (0.6)0 (0)
 Other determined etiology10 (6.1)5 (5.0)
 Undetermined etiology63 (38.7)31 (31.0)
Baseline NIHSS score18 (13–21)17 (14–20)0.69[]
ASPECTS at baseline7 (5–9)7 (4–8)0.72[]
 ASPECTS (0–4)25 (14.7)28 (25.2)0.04[*]
 ASPECTS (5–7)73 (42.9)35 (31.5)
 ASPECTS (8–10)72 (42.4)48 (43.2)
Baseline occlusion location (%)<0.001[§]
 ICA13 (7.6)30 (27.0)
 M1155 (91.2)81 (73.0)
 M22 (1.2)0 (0)
Workflow time (min)
 From stroke onset to imaging112 (88–135)112 (89–142)0.91[]
 From stroke onset to IVT146 (124–170)154 (120–180)0.49[]
 From stroke onset to recanalization239 (208–270)261 (204–291)0.44[]
ASPECTS at 24 hours7 (4–8)6 (3–8)0.40[]

Values are presented as number (%), mean±standard deviation, or median (interquartile range).

CBS, clot burden score; IVTMT, intravenous thrombolysis mechanical thrombectomy; NIHSS, National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale; ASPECTS, Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score; ICA, internal carotid artery; IVT, intravenous thrombolysis.

Chi-square test;

Mann-Whitney test;

Median test;

Fisher exact test.

Primary outcome

The primary outcome was assessed in 281 patients (Table 2). At 3 months, 79 of 139 patients (56.8%) in the IVTMT group and 65 of 142 (45.8%) in the IVT group had functional independence. The primary outcome was not influenced by the presence of a SVS (120/144 in mRS 0–2 and 114/137 in mRS >2, P=0.98).
Table 2.

Patient characteristics of dichotomized mRS groups

CharacteristicmRS ≤2mRS >2P
Number144137
IVTMT randomization group79 (54.9)60 (43.8)0.06[*]
Age (yr)60.1±14.666.5±12.7<0.001[]
 ≤7097 (67.4)62 (45.3)<0.001[*]
 >7047 (32.6)75 (54.7)
Sex0.94[*]
 Male75 (52.1)72 (52.6)
 Female69 (47.9)65 (47.4)
Comorbidities
 Hypertension61 (43.0)80 (58.8)0.01[*]
 Diabetes mellitus10 (7.0)15 (11.1)0.23[*]
 History of stroke11 (7.8)7 (5.3)0.41[*]
 Hypercholesterolemia68 (52.3)61 (51.7)0.92[*]
 Current tobacco use30 (21.7)27 (23.9)0.69[*]
 Coronary disease16 (11.4)24 (18.8)0.09[*]
Baseline NIHSS score16 (12–19)19 (16–22)<0.001[]
ASPECTS at baseline7 (6–9)6 (4–8)<0.01[]
 ASPECTS (0–4)16 (11.1)37 (27.0)0.002[*]
 ASPECTS (5–7)58 (40.3)50 (36.5)
 ASPECTS (8–10)70 (48.6)50 (36.5)
Baseline occlusion location (%)<0.001[§]
 ICA10 (6.9)33 (24.1)
 M1133 (92.4)103 (75.2)
 M21 (0.7)1 (0.7)
Workflow time (min)
 From stroke onset to imaging111 (85–140)114 (93–137)0.80[]
 From stroke onset to IVT146 (120–179)150 (125–175)0.53[]
 From stroke onset to recanalization240 (204–280)250 (208–281)0.57[]
SVS (+)120 (83.3)114 (83.2)0.98[*]
SVS length14.3 (10.6–18.7)17.4 (12.9–23.6)<0.04[]
T2[*]-CBS >697 (67.4)73 (53.3)0.02[*]
Recanalizers (TICI ≥2b)4325<0.001[*]
ASPECTS at 24 hours8 (6–9)5 (2–7)<0.001[]
NIHSS score at 24 hours5 (2–9)18 (14–22)<0.001[]

Values are presented as number (%), mean±standard deviation, or median (interquartile range).

mRS, modified Rankin Scale; IVTMT, intravenous thrombolysis mechanical thrombectomy; NIHSS, National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale; ASPECTS, Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score; ICA, internal carotid artery; IVT, intravenous thrombolysis; SVS, susceptibility vessel sign; CBS, clot burden score; TICI, Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction.

Chi-square test;

Mann-Whitney test;

Median test;

Fisher exact test.

Proportion of small clot was significantly higher in patients with favorable (97/144 patients, 67.4%) than in patients with unfavorable outcome (73/137, 53.3%; OR, 1.81; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.12 to 2.94; P=0.016). Small clot was associated with a shift toward better outcome on the mRS; proportional odds ratio (POR) per each T2*-CBS point was, with randomization group adjustment: 1.19 (95% CI, 1.05 to 1.34), 1.34 (95% CI, 1.13 to 1.59), and 1.04 (0.87 to 1.23) (interaction, P=0.03) in the whole population, in IVT and IVTMT groups, respectively. After adjustment, the effect of the full scale T2*-CBS was not statistically significant in the whole population (POR, 1.12; 95% CI, 0.99 to 1.27; P=0.1) and for the IVTMT group (POR, 0.94; 95% CI, 0.79 to 1.12; P=0.73) but remains significant for the IVT group (POR, 1.32; 95% CI, 1.11 to 1.58). Considering the dichotomized T2*-CBS, similar results were found (Table 3 and Figure 3).
Table 3.

Estimates of POR of T2*-CBS using ordinal logistic regressions explaining lower modified Rankin Scale score at 3 months

Proportional odds ratio forPOR[]
APOR[]
IVT subgroupIVTMT subgroupAllIVT subgroupIVTMT subgroupAll
Increase of 1 point of CBS1.341.041.191.320.941.12
(1.13–1.59)[*](0.87–1.23)(1.05–1.34)[*](1.11–1.58)[*](0.79–1.12)(0.99–1.27)
CBS >6 vs. CBS ≤63.190.931.733.060.711.48
(1.75–5.82)[*](0.51–1.7)(1.13–2.65)[*](1.63–5.74)[*](0.38–1.32)(0.95–2.30)

Adjustment on age, National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS), glycemia, and Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score (ASPECTS).

POR, proportional odds ratio; CBS, clot burden score; APOR, adjusted proportional odds ratio; IVT, intravenous thrombolysis; IVTMT, intravenous thrombolysis mechanical thrombectomy.

Statistically significant (P≤0.05);

POR of lower mRS for T2*-CBS (with 95% confidence interval) estimated by Model A, i.e., without adjustment;

APOR of lower mRS for T2*-CBS (with 95% confidence interval) estimated by Model B.

Figure 3.

Modified Rankin Scale distribution for the intra-arterial treatment and control arms for T2*-CBS groups (0–6) and (7–10). CBS, clot burden score; IVT, intravenous thrombolysis; and IVTMT, intravenous thrombolysis mechanical thrombectomy.

Secondary outcomes

Successful recanalization was observed in 66 of 91 patients (72.5%) in the IVTMT group who received MT treatment. There was no association between the presence of SVS and recanalization result (P=0.45) nor influence of the T2*-CBS, considered as a continuous variable (P=0.75) or dichotomized (7-10 vs. ≤6, P=0.57) (Supplementary Table 2).

Discussion

In this prespecified post hoc analysis of THRACE trial, longer clot as assessed using T2*-CBS was associated with a higher likelihood of unfavorable neurological outcome. In analysis of 3-month ordinal mRS, adjusted on randomization group, there was a 19% relative increase in the likelihood of a worse outcome with every point decrease in T2*-CBS. Despite the worst outcome with long clot, the relative benefit of IVTMT over IVT seemed to increase with longer thrombus. We found a significant interaction between treatment allocation and clot length as measured using T2*-CBS. In the recent RCTs [1-7], evaluation of intracranial thrombus burden was performed on CTA. In the ESCAPE trial, Puetz et al. [22] demonstrated an increase in benefit from MT for lower CTA-CBS, i.e., longer thrombus, when compared with higher CTA-CBS. Similarly, in a post hoc analysis of 108 patients included in the THERAPY trial [14], longer thrombi, as defined on CTA, were independently associated with worse clinical outcomes. Furthermore, in adjusted analyses of 90-day ordinal mRS, there was a 33% relative increase in the likelihood of a worse outcome with every 5-mm increase in thrombus length and the relative benefit of MT compared with IVT alone increased with thrombus length [14]. Our results stand in apparent contradiction with the post hoc analysis of the MR CLEAN trial, which did not establish thrombus length as a treatment effect modifier [13]. In this latter study, the underestimation of the increased benefit of MT over IVT in longer thrombi can be tentatively explained by the fact that CTA may overestimate the extent of thrombus involvement. Indeed, if the collateral circulation is weak or with short delays between contrast injection and imaging acquisition [23], an overestimation of clot length is possible. In addition, although CTA has been demonstrated to provide accurate thrombus length measurement [24], it is less sensitive than MR susceptibility weighted sequences [25]. However, there are no comparative studies of clot length imaged with both CT and MRI. The greater beneficial effect in IVTMT group accounts for the paradoxical finding of increasing relative benefit of MT despite the overall worse outcome associated with longer thrombi. This finding illustrates the difference between prognostic and therapeutic imaging biomarkers; in AIS-LVO patients, long clot is simultaneously a negative prognostic biomarker and a positive therapeutic biomarker with regards to MT (i.e., clot length modifies the differential treatment effect of MT or IVT). The detrimental effect of low CBS on clinical outcome is most likely attributable to greater difficulty of recanalizing longer and/or multisegment thrombi [14,24]. Other explanation of the worst outcomes seen in lower T2*-CBS may be that longer clot were associated with lower baseline ASPECTS. In case of longer clot, there is a higher probability of occlusion of the lenticulostriate and insula perforators, for which collateral compensation is limited. In addition, an inverse correlation between pial collaterals strength and clot length has been demonstrated [14]. Weaker collaterals may contribute to both the extent of the thrombus and a reduction in cerebral blood flow to the ischemic penumbra, potentiating the extent and degree of injury, hence contributing to worse clinical outcomes. Taken together, worst outcome seen with long clot is likely the consequence of a synergistic effect of poor collateral strength, larger baseline infarct and longer thrombotic occlusion that is difficult to rapidly recanalize. In line with THERAPY trial results [14], we did not demonstrate any influence of the T2*-CBS on recanalization result, in the IVTMT group. As a difference, in our study, patients were not included based on clot length whereas in THERAPY trial, only patients harboring thrombi >8 mm were included. A non-randomized study of mostly stent-retriever (SR) MT also demonstrated no relationship between thrombus length, as measured on SVS, and successful recanalization [26]. Our study reinforces the idea that, if longer thrombi are unlikely to recanalize in IVT patients, length did not impact efficacy of MT. Recently, randomized comparison of first-line MT with ADAPT technique versus SR did not result in an increased successful revascularization rate [27]. However, in the ASTER trial, thrombus length was short with mean values of 13 and 11.5 mm, in ADAPT and SR groups, respectively. Furthermore, in a recent post hoc analysis of the ASTER trial, the first-line MT strategy (aspiration vs. stent) did not result in an increased successful reperfusion rate in AIS-LVO patients according to the admission CBS [28]. Identifying the best MT method to address LVOs with long clot, i.e., T2*-CBS (0–6), will most likely be a challenge, notably because of the expected limited added benefit of a device association choice versus another, resulting in anticipated power issues. Knowledge of other thrombus characteristics, such as complex composition, tensile, compressive, rheological, and frictional properties, which might contribute to their relative resistance to clot removal during MT, may help in optimizing endovascular devices and strategies [29,30]. Until more data are available, clot length, assessed using T2*-CBS, is a reasonable approach to guide treatment strategies and select patients in future trials. The strength of our study is that, beyond the demonstration of a LVO, no other imaging criteria was used to select patients in the THRACE trial. Hence, patients with unfavorable clinical and imaging profiles were included, resulting in generalizable findings. The present study was based on the largest to date AIS-LVO population initially included based on brain MRI data in a RCT and allows for a less biased assessment of the efficacy of baseline imaging prognostic biomarkers to select patients for future studies. A few points may require clarification. First, 59 patients randomized to the intervention arm did not receive MT. When evaluating imaging biomarker of efficacy for MT, it could add to the sensitivity of the analysis to only include the patients who actually received MT. A second limitation is that T2*-CBS likely underestimates full clot extent, given that the susceptibility effect depends on thrombus composition and age [15]. An additional limitation is the variability in MRI measurement [31]. Indeed, the extent of the SVS blooming artifact might vary with different magnetic field strengths and echo time. Future studies should examine the impact of imaging acquisition parameters on the T2*-CBS variability. Finally, 47 of 281 patients did not demonstrate SVS and were included in the analysis as T2*-CBS=10. This may have underestimated the real clot length in these patients.

Conclusions

Clot length, as assessed using the MRI based T2*-CBS is independently associated with functional outcome in patients with AIS caused by a LVO, and may be used as prognostic biomarker. Despite the worst outcome with long clot, the relative benefit of MT over IVT seemed to increase with low T2*-CBS.
  31 in total

1.  Similar Outcomes for Contact Aspiration and Stent Retriever Use According to the Admission Clot Burden Score in ASTER.

Authors:  François Zhu; Bertrand Lapergue; Maéva Kyheng; Raphael Blanc; Julien Labreuche; Malek Ben Machaa; Alain Duhamel; Gautier Marnat; Suzana Saleme; Vincent Costalat; Serge Bracard; Sébastien Richard; Hubert Desal; Mikael Mazighi; Arturo Consoli; Michel Piotin; Benjamin Gory
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2018-06-07       Impact factor: 7.914

2.  Clot Burden Score on Baseline Computerized Tomographic Angiography and Intra-Arterial Treatment Effect in Acute Ischemic Stroke.

Authors:  Kilian M Treurniet; Albert J Yoo; Olvert A Berkhemer; Hester F Lingsma; Anna M M Boers; Puck S S Fransen; Debbie Beumer; Lucie A van den Berg; Marieke E S Sprengers; Sjoerd F M Jenniskens; Geert J Lycklama À Nijeholt; Marianne A A van Walderveen; Joseph C J Bot; Ludo F M Beenen; René van den Berg; Wim H van Zwam; Aad van der Lugt; Robert J van Oostenbrugge; Diederik W J Dippel; Yvo B W E M Roos; Henk A Marquering; Charles B L M Majoie
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2016-11-08       Impact factor: 7.914

3.  Aspiration Thrombectomy After Intravenous Alteplase Versus Intravenous Alteplase Alone.

Authors:  J Mocco; Osama O Zaidat; Rüdiger von Kummer; Albert J Yoo; Rishi Gupta; Demetrius Lopes; Don Frei; Harish Shownkeen; Ron Budzik; Zahra A Ajani; Aaron Grossman; Dorethea Altschul; Cameron McDougall; Lindsey Blake; Brian-Fred Fitzsimmons; Dileep Yavagal; John Terry; Jeffrey Farkas; Seon Kyu Lee; Blaise Baxter; Martin Wiesmann; Michael Knauth; Donald Heck; Syed Hussain; David Chiu; Michael J Alexander; Timothy Malisch; Jawad Kirmani; Laszlo Miskolczi; Pooja Khatri
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2016-08-02       Impact factor: 7.914

4.  Impact of Thrombus Length on Outcomes After Intra-Arterial Aspiration Thrombectomy in the THERAPY Trial.

Authors:  Albert J Yoo; Pooja Khatri; J Mocco; Osama O Zaidat; Rishi Gupta; Donald Frei; Demetrius Lopes; Harish Shownkeen; Olvert A Berkhemer; Denise Meyer; Susana S Hak; Sophia S Kuo; Hope Buell; Arani Bose; Siu Po Sit; Rüdiger von Kummer
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2017-06-08       Impact factor: 7.914

5.  Stent-retriever thrombectomy after intravenous t-PA vs. t-PA alone in stroke.

Authors:  Jeffrey L Saver; Mayank Goyal; Alain Bonafe; Hans-Christoph Diener; Elad I Levy; Vitor M Pereira; Gregory W Albers; Christophe Cognard; David J Cohen; Werner Hacke; Olav Jansen; Tudor G Jovin; Heinrich P Mattle; Raul G Nogueira; Adnan H Siddiqui; Dileep R Yavagal; Blaise W Baxter; Thomas G Devlin; Demetrius K Lopes; Vivek K Reddy; Richard du Mesnil de Rochemont; Oliver C Singer; Reza Jahan
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2015-04-17       Impact factor: 91.245

6.  A randomized trial of intraarterial treatment for acute ischemic stroke.

Authors:  Olvert A Berkhemer; Puck S S Fransen; Debbie Beumer; Lucie A van den Berg; Hester F Lingsma; Albert J Yoo; Wouter J Schonewille; Jan Albert Vos; Paul J Nederkoorn; Marieke J H Wermer; Marianne A A van Walderveen; Julie Staals; Jeannette Hofmeijer; Jacques A van Oostayen; Geert J Lycklama à Nijeholt; Jelis Boiten; Patrick A Brouwer; Bart J Emmer; Sebastiaan F de Bruijn; Lukas C van Dijk; L Jaap Kappelle; Rob H Lo; Ewoud J van Dijk; Joost de Vries; Paul L M de Kort; Willem Jan J van Rooij; Jan S P van den Berg; Boudewijn A A M van Hasselt; Leo A M Aerden; René J Dallinga; Marieke C Visser; Joseph C J Bot; Patrick C Vroomen; Omid Eshghi; Tobien H C M L Schreuder; Roel J J Heijboer; Koos Keizer; Alexander V Tielbeek; Heleen M den Hertog; Dick G Gerrits; Renske M van den Berg-Vos; Giorgos B Karas; Ewout W Steyerberg; H Zwenneke Flach; Henk A Marquering; Marieke E S Sprengers; Sjoerd F M Jenniskens; Ludo F M Beenen; René van den Berg; Peter J Koudstaal; Wim H van Zwam; Yvo B W E M Roos; Aad van der Lugt; Robert J van Oostenbrugge; Charles B L M Majoie; Diederik W J Dippel
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2014-12-17       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  CT angiography clot burden score and collateral score: correlation with clinical and radiologic outcomes in acute middle cerebral artery infarct.

Authors:  I Y L Tan; A M Demchuk; J Hopyan; L Zhang; D Gladstone; K Wong; M Martin; S P Symons; A J Fox; R I Aviv
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2009-01-15       Impact factor: 3.825

8.  Effect of Endovascular Contact Aspiration vs Stent Retriever on Revascularization in Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke and Large Vessel Occlusion: The ASTER Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Bertrand Lapergue; Raphael Blanc; Benjamin Gory; Julien Labreuche; Alain Duhamel; Gautier Marnat; Suzana Saleme; Vincent Costalat; Serge Bracard; Hubert Desal; Mikael Mazighi; Arturo Consoli; Michel Piotin
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2017-08-01       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 9.  Computed Tomography-Based Thrombus Imaging for the Prediction of Recanalization after Reperfusion Therapy in Stroke.

Authors:  Ji Hoe Heo; Kyeonsub Kim; Joonsang Yoo; Young Dae Kim; Hyo Suk Nam; Eung Yeop Kim
Journal:  J Stroke       Date:  2017-01-31       Impact factor: 6.967

10.  Thrombus imaging in acute stroke: correlation of thrombus length on susceptibility-weighted imaging with endovascular reperfusion success.

Authors:  Christian Weisstanner; Pascal P Gratz; Gerhard Schroth; Rajeev K Verma; Arnold Köchl; Simon Jung; Marcel Arnold; Jan Gralla; Christoph Zubler; Kety Hsieh; Pasquale Mordasini; Marwan El-Koussy
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2014-05-16       Impact factor: 5.315

View more
  7 in total

1.  Risks of Undersizing Stent Retriever Length Relative to Thrombus Length in Patients with Acute Ischemic Stroke.

Authors:  N F Belachew; T Dobrocky; T R Meinel; A Hakim; J Vynckier; M Arnold; D J Seiffge; R Wiest; E I Piechowiak; U Fischer; J Gralla; P Mordasini; J Kaesmacher
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2021-10-14       Impact factor: 3.825

2.  Factors That Influence Susceptibility Vessel Sign in Patients With Acute Stroke Referred for Mechanical Thrombectomy.

Authors:  Manon Dillmann; Louise Bonnet; Fabrice Vuillier; Thierry Moulin; Alessandra Biondi; Guillaume Charbonnier
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2022-05-11       Impact factor: 4.086

3.  Clot Burden Score and Collateral Status and Their Impact on Functional Outcome in Acute Ischemic Stroke.

Authors:  I Derraz; M Pou; J Labreuche; L Legrand; S Soize; M Tisserand; C Rosso; M Piotin; G Boulouis; C Oppenheim; O Naggara; S Bracard; F Clarençon; B Lapergue; R Bourcier
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2020-11-12       Impact factor: 3.825

4.  Prediction of Early Recanalization after Intravenous Thrombolysis in Patients with Large-Vessel Occlusion.

Authors:  Young Dae Kim; Hyo Suk Nam; Joonsang Yoo; Hyungjong Park; Sung-Il Sohn; Jeong-Ho Hong; Byung Moon Kim; Dong Joon Kim; Oh Young Bang; Woo-Keun Seo; Jong-Won Chung; Kyung-Yul Lee; Yo Han Jung; Hye Sun Lee; Seong Hwan Ahn; Dong Hoon Shin; Hye-Yeon Choi; Han-Jin Cho; Jang-Hyun Baek; Gyu Sik Kim; Kwon-Duk Seo; Seo Hyun Kim; Tae-Jin Song; Jinkwon Kim; Sang Won Han; Joong Hyun Park; Sung Ik Lee; JoonNyung Heo; Jin Kyo Choi; Ji Hoe Heo
Journal:  J Stroke       Date:  2021-05-31       Impact factor: 6.967

Review 5.  Radiology-Pathology Correlations of Intracranial Clots: Current Theories, Clinical Applications, and Future Directions.

Authors:  J C Benson; D F Kallmes; A S Larson; W Brinjikji
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2021-07-22       Impact factor: 4.966

6.  Initial Clinical Experience of Repeat Thrombectomy with a Retrieval Stent (RTRS) with Continuous Proximal Flow Arrest by Balloon Guide Catheter for Acute Intracranial Carotid Occlusion.

Authors:  Wen-Huo Chen; Tingyu Yi; Yan-Min Wu; Zhi-Nan Pan; Xiu-Fen Zheng; Xiao-Hui Lin; Ding-Lai Lin; Rong-Cheng Chen
Journal:  Behav Neurol       Date:  2021-12-31       Impact factor: 3.342

7.  Multi-Mode Imaging Scale for Endovascular Therapy in Patients with Acute Ischemic Stroke (META).

Authors:  Wansi Zhong; Zhicai Chen; Shenqiang Yan; Ying Zhou; Ruoxia Zhang; Zhongyu Luo; Jun Yu; Min Lou
Journal:  Brain Sci       Date:  2022-06-24
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.