BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The susceptibility vessel sign (SVS) on T2*-weighted magnetic resonance imaging has been reported in several studies as a negative predictor of early recanalization after intravenous thrombolysis. The meaning of SVS regarding the results of mechanical thrombectomy with stent retrievers was investigated. METHODS: Susceptibility vessel sign presence and length were studied in 153 acute ischaemic stroke patients (82 men; mean ± SD age 59 ± 17 years, baseline National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score 17.2 ± 6.5) from three stroke centres, treated with either mechanical thrombectomy alone (n = 84) or bridging therapy (n = 69). Variables were compared between recanalizers, defined as thrombolysis in cerebral infarction (TICI) scores ≥2b, and non-recanalizers (TICI<2b). RESULTS: The SVS was present in 113 (73.8%) patients. There was no association between the presence of SVS and recanalization, obtained in 86 (56.2%) patients, in the whole population [odds ratio (OR) 1.24, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.53-2.92, P = 0.84) and in treatment subgroups (bridging: OR = 0.91, 95% CI 0.29-2.87, P = 1.0; thrombectomy alone: OR = 1.85, 95% CI 0.48-7.16, P = 0.54). However, in SVS+ patients, recanalization decreased with SVS length (OR 0.94 for each additional mm, 95% CI 0.89-0.99; P = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: The success of recanalization in acute stroke patients treated with stent retrievers was related to thrombus length but not to the presence of SVS.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The susceptibility vessel sign (SVS) on T2*-weighted magnetic resonance imaging has been reported in several studies as a negative predictor of early recanalization after intravenous thrombolysis. The meaning of SVS regarding the results of mechanical thrombectomy with stent retrievers was investigated. METHODS: Susceptibility vessel sign presence and length were studied in 153 acute ischaemic strokepatients (82 men; mean ± SD age 59 ± 17 years, baseline National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score 17.2 ± 6.5) from three stroke centres, treated with either mechanical thrombectomy alone (n = 84) or bridging therapy (n = 69). Variables were compared between recanalizers, defined as thrombolysis in cerebral infarction (TICI) scores ≥2b, and non-recanalizers (TICI<2b). RESULTS: The SVS was present in 113 (73.8%) patients. There was no association between the presence of SVS and recanalization, obtained in 86 (56.2%) patients, in the whole population [odds ratio (OR) 1.24, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.53-2.92, P = 0.84) and in treatment subgroups (bridging: OR = 0.91, 95% CI 0.29-2.87, P = 1.0; thrombectomy alone: OR = 1.85, 95% CI 0.48-7.16, P = 0.54). However, in SVS+ patients, recanalization decreased with SVS length (OR 0.94 for each additional mm, 95% CI 0.89-0.99; P = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: The success of recanalization in acute strokepatients treated with stent retrievers was related to thrombus length but not to the presence of SVS.
Authors: Waleed Brinjikji; Sharon Duffy; Anthony Burrows; Werner Hacke; David Liebeskind; Charles B L M Majoie; Diederik W J Dippel; Adnan H Siddiqui; Pooja Khatri; Blaise Baxter; Raul Nogeuira; Matt Gounis; Tudor Jovin; David F Kallmes Journal: J Neurointerv Surg Date: 2016-05-10 Impact factor: 5.836
Authors: R Bourcier; R Pautre; M Mirza; C Castets; J Darcourt; J Labreuche; L Detraz; H Desal; J-M Serfaty; C Toquet Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2019-01 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: Jun-Soo Byun; Patrick Nicholson; Christopher A Hilditch; Anderson Chun On Tsang; Vitor Mendes Pereira; Timo Krings; Yibin Fang; Waleed Brinjikji Journal: Interv Neuroradiol Date: 2019-02-04 Impact factor: 1.610
Authors: Seyedmehdi Payabvash; John C Benson; Shayandokht Taleb; Jeffrey B Rykken; Benjamin Hoffman; Mark C Oswood; Alexander M McKinney Journal: Br J Radiol Date: 2016-12 Impact factor: 3.039
Authors: Mansour Al-Zghloul; Holger Wenz; Máté Maros; Johannes Böhme; Christoph Groden; Alex Förster Journal: In Vivo Date: 2018 Jul-Aug Impact factor: 2.155