Literature DB >> 30731514

Population pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic modelling of the relationship between testosterone and prostate specific antigen in patients with prostate cancer during treatment with leuprorelin.

Nelleke Snelder1, Henk-Jan Drenth1, Kirsten Riber Bergmann1, Nolan David Wood2, Mark Hibberd2, Graham Scott2.   

Abstract

AIMS: This investigation aimed to quantitatively characterize the relationship between the gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist leuprorelin, testosterone (T) and prostate specific antigen (PSA) concentrations over time, to aid identification of a target T concentration that optimises the balance of the benefits of T suppression whilst reducing the risk of side effects related to futile over-suppression.
METHODS: Data from a single dose study to investigate the effect of leuprorelin in a 6-month depot formulation on T and PSA in prostate cancer patients were analysed using a population pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic modelling approach. The developed model was qualified using external data from 3 studies, in which the effect of different formulations of leuprorelin on T and PSA was evaluated in prostate cancer patients.
RESULTS: The effect of leuprorelin on the relationship between T and PSA was adequately characterized by the Romero model with minor modifications, combined with a turnover model to describe the delay in response between T and PSA. The data were significantly better described when assuming a minimum PSA level that is independent on the treatment-related reduction in T, as compared to a model with a proportional reduction in PSA and T.
CONCLUSIONS: The model-based analysis suggests that on a population level, reducing T concentrations below 35 ng/dL does not result in a further decrease in PSA levels (>95% of the minimal PSA level is reached). More data are required to support this relationship in the lower T and PSA range.
© 2019 The British Pharmacological Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  PSA; leuprorelin; population PKPD; prostate cancer; testosterone

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30731514      PMCID: PMC6533438          DOI: 10.1111/bcp.13891

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol        ISSN: 0306-5251            Impact factor:   4.335


  27 in total

1.  Likelihood based approaches to handling data below the quantification limit using NONMEM VI.

Authors:  Jae Eun Ahn; Mats O Karlsson; Adrian Dunne; Thomas M Ludden
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn       Date:  2008-08-07       Impact factor: 2.745

2.  Prostate-specific antigen doubling time predicts clinical outcome and survival in prostate cancer patients treated with combined radiation and hormone therapy.

Authors:  Andrew K Lee; Larry B Levy; Rex Cheung; Deborah Kuban
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2005-10-01       Impact factor: 7.038

3.  Final results of the Canadian prospective phase II trial of intermittent androgen suppression for men in biochemical recurrence after radiotherapy for locally advanced prostate cancer: clinical parameters.

Authors:  Nicholas Bruchovsky; Laurence Klotz; Juanita Crook; Shawn Malone; Charles Ludgate; W James Morris; Martin E Gleave; S Larry Goldenberg
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2006-07-15       Impact factor: 6.860

4.  Loss of androgen dependence is associated with an increase in tumorigenic stem cells and resistance to cell-death genes.

Authors:  P S Rennie; N Bruchovsky; A J Coldman
Journal:  J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol       Date:  1990-12-20       Impact factor: 4.292

Review 5.  The development of androgen-independent prostate cancer.

Authors:  B J Feldman; D Feldman
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 60.716

6.  Locally advanced prostate cancer--biochemical results from a prospective phase II study of intermittent androgen suppression for men with evidence of prostate-specific antigen recurrence after radiotherapy.

Authors:  Nicholas Bruchovsky; Laurence Klotz; Juanita Crook; S Larry Goldenberg
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2007-03-01       Impact factor: 6.860

7.  Prostate cancer-specific mortality after radical prostatectomy for patients treated in the prostate-specific antigen era.

Authors:  Andrew J Stephenson; Michael W Kattan; James A Eastham; Fernando J Bianco; Ofer Yossepowitch; Andrew J Vickers; Eric A Klein; David P Wood; Peter T Scardino
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2009-07-27       Impact factor: 44.544

8.  Safety and clinical efficacy of a new 6-month depot formulation of leuprorelin acetate in patients with prostate cancer in Europe.

Authors:  U W Tunn; K Wiedey
Journal:  Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis       Date:  2008-11-25       Impact factor: 5.554

9.  Intramuscular depot formulations of leuprolide acetate suppress testosterone levels below a 20 ng/dL threshold: a retrospective analysis of two Phase III studies.

Authors:  Aaron Spitz; Marc Gittelman; Lawrence I Karsh; Sanja Dragnic; Ahmed M Soliman; Aditya Lele; Damian Gruca; Michael Norton
Journal:  Res Rep Urol       Date:  2016-08-23

Review 10.  Molecular pathways: Inhibiting steroid biosynthesis in prostate cancer.

Authors:  Roberta Ferraldeschi; Nima Sharifi; Richard J Auchus; Gerhardt Attard
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2013-03-07       Impact factor: 12.531

View more
  1 in total

1.  A population K-PD model analysis of long-term testosterone inhibition in prostate cancer patients undergoing intermittent androgen deprivation therapy.

Authors:  Joost DeJongh; Maurice Ahsman; Nelleke Snelder
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn       Date:  2021-02-04       Impact factor: 2.745

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.