Literature DB >> 33538922

A population K-PD model analysis of long-term testosterone inhibition in prostate cancer patients undergoing intermittent androgen deprivation therapy.

Joost DeJongh1, Maurice Ahsman2, Nelleke Snelder2.   

Abstract

Intermittent androgen deprivation therapy with gonadotropin-releasing-hormone (GnRH) agonists can prevent or delay disease progression and development of castration resistant prostate cancer for subpopulations of prostate cancer patients. It may also reduce risk and severity of side effects associated with chemical castration in prostate cancer (PCa) patients. One of the earliest comprehensively documented clinical trials on this was reported in a Canadian patient population treated with leuprorelin preceded by a lead-in with cyproterone acetate. A systems-based mixed effect analysis of testosterone response in active and recovery phases allows inference of new information from this patient population. Efficacy of androgen deprivation therapy is presumed to depend on a treshold value for testosterone at the nadir, below which no additional beneficial effects on PSA reponse can be expected, and occurance of testosterone breakthroughs during active therapy. The present analysis results in a mixed effect model, incorporating GnRH receptor activation, testosterone turnover and feedback mechanisms, describing and predicting testosterone inhibition under intermittent androgen deprivation therapy on the individual and population level, during multiple years of therapy. Testosterone levels in these patients decline over time with an estimated first order rate constant of 0.083 year-1(T1/2 = 8.4 y), with a substantial distribution among this patient population, compared to the general population. PCa patients leaving the trial due to unmanageble PSA relapse appear to have slightly higher testosterone levels at the nadir than sustained responders. These findings are expected to contribute to an increased understanding of the role of testosterone in long term disease progression of prostate cancer.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Leuprorelin; PSA; Population K-PD model; Prostate cancer; Testosterone; Testosterone decline rate; iADT

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33538922     DOI: 10.1007/s10928-020-09736-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn        ISSN: 1567-567X            Impact factor:   2.745


  28 in total

Review 1.  Effective testosterone suppression for patients with prostate cancer: is there a best castration?

Authors:  Michael G Oefelein; Martin I Resnick
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 2.649

2.  Pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic model of the testosterone effects of triptorelin administered in sustained release formulations in patients with prostate cancer.

Authors:  Elba Romero; Nieves Vélez de Mendizabal; Josep-María Cendrós; Concepción Peraire; Emma Bascompta; Rosendo Obach; Iñaki F Trocóniz
Journal:  J Pharmacol Exp Ther       Date:  2012-06-12       Impact factor: 4.030

3.  Population pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic modelling of the relationship between testosterone and prostate specific antigen in patients with prostate cancer during treatment with leuprorelin.

Authors:  Nelleke Snelder; Henk-Jan Drenth; Kirsten Riber Bergmann; Nolan David Wood; Mark Hibberd; Graham Scott
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2019-04-03       Impact factor: 4.335

4.  Diabetes and cardiovascular disease during androgen deprivation therapy for prostate cancer.

Authors:  Nancy L Keating; A James O'Malley; Matthew R Smith
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2006-09-20       Impact factor: 44.544

5.  EAU-ESTRO-SIOG Guidelines on Prostate Cancer. Part II: Treatment of Relapsing, Metastatic, and Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Philip Cornford; Joaquim Bellmunt; Michel Bolla; Erik Briers; Maria De Santis; Tobias Gross; Ann M Henry; Steven Joniau; Thomas B Lam; Malcolm D Mason; Henk G van der Poel; Theo H van der Kwast; Olivier Rouvière; Thomas Wiegel; Nicolas Mottet
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2016-08-31       Impact factor: 20.096

6.  Incomplete testosterone suppression with luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone agonists: does it happen and does it matter?

Authors:  Tom Pickles; Jeremy Hamm; W James Morris; William E Schreiber; Scott Tyldesley
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2012-05-07       Impact factor: 5.588

7.  Evaluating Intermittent Androgen-Deprivation Therapy Phase III Clinical Trials: The Devil Is in the Details.

Authors:  Maha Hussain; Catherine Tangen; Celestia Higano; Nicholas Vogelzang; Ian Thompson
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-11-09       Impact factor: 44.544

8.  Individual variations of serum testosterone in patients with prostate cancer receiving androgen deprivation therapy.

Authors:  Juan Morote; Jacques Planas; Carlos Salvador; Carles X Raventós; Roberto Catalán; Jaume Reventós
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2008-10-31       Impact factor: 5.588

9.  Efficacy and safety of leuprolide acetate 6-month depot for suppression of testosterone in patients with prostate cancer.

Authors:  A Spitz; J M Young; L Larsen; C Mattia-Goldberg; J Donnelly; K Chwalisz
Journal:  Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis       Date:  2011-10-25       Impact factor: 5.554

Review 10.  International study into the use of intermittent hormone therapy in the treatment of carcinoma of the prostate: a meta-analysis of 1446 patients.

Authors:  Greg L Shaw; Peter Wilson; Jack Cuzick; David M Prowse; S Larry Goldenberg; Nigel A Spry; Tim Oliver
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2007-03-06       Impact factor: 5.588

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.