Literature DB >> 17441293

National outcomes after gastric resection for neoplasm.

Jillian K Smith1, James T McPhee, Joshua S Hill, Giles F Whalen, Mary E Sullivan, Demetrius E Litwin, Frederick A Anderson, Jennifer F Tseng.   

Abstract

HYPOTHESIS: That factors affecting outcomes of surgical resection in the treatment of gastric cancer can be identified using a large US database.
DESIGN: Retrospective observational study.
SETTING: The Nationwide Inpatient Sample from January 1, 1998, through December 31, 2003. PATIENTS: We included 13 354 patient discharges (approximately 66 096 nationally by weighted analysis) who underwent gastric resection for neoplasm. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: In-hospital mortality. Univariate analyses were performed by means of chi(2) tests. A multivariate logistic regression was performed to determine which variables were independently predictive of in-hospital mortality.
RESULTS: During the study period, 50 738 patients (approximately 250 420 nationally) were discharged with the diagnosis of gastric neoplasm. Of those, 13 354 (26.3%) underwent gastric resection during their hospitalization. In-hospital mortality for patients undergoing surgery was 6.0%, without significant change from 1998 through 2003. Factors predictive of significantly increased in-hospital mortality included low annual hospital surgical volume (lowest [<or= 4 gastrectomies per year] vs highest [>or= 11 gastrectomies per year], 6.8% vs 4.9%; adjusted odds ratio [OR], 1.5; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.2-1.8]), older patient age (50-69 vs <50 years, 4.0% vs 2.1%; adjusted OR, 1.5; 95% CI, 1.1-2.2) (>or =70 vs <50 years, 8.6% vs 2.1%; adjusted OR, 2.9; 95% CI, 2.0-4.3), male sex (male vs female, 6.7% vs 5.0%; adjusted OR, 1.3; 95% CI, 1.1-1.5), and procedure type (total gastrectomy vs all other resections, 8.0% vs 5.3%; adjusted OR, 1.4; 95% CI, 1.2-1.7).
CONCLUSIONS: Higher annual surgical volume is predictive of lower in-hospital mortality for patients undergoing gastric resection for neoplasm. Other factors significantly associated with superior outcomes after gastric resection included diagnosis type, procedure type, younger age, female sex, and fewer comorbid conditions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17441293     DOI: 10.1001/archsurg.142.4.387

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Surg        ISSN: 0004-0010


  40 in total

1.  Trends in Major Gastrectomy for Cancer: Frequency and Outcomes.

Authors:  Eric M Groh; Noorie Hyun; David Check; Theo Heller; R Taylor Ripley; Jonathan M Hernandez; Barry I Graubard; Jeremy L Davis
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2018-12-03       Impact factor: 3.452

2.  Risk factors for surgical site infections after elective gastrectomy.

Authors:  Kazuhiro Migita; Tomoyoshi Takayama; Sohei Matsumoto; Kohei Wakatsuki; Koji Enomoto; Tetsuya Tanaka; Masahiro Ito; Yoshiyuki Nakajima
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2012-02-15       Impact factor: 3.452

3.  Comparison of long-term prognosis of laparoscopy-assisted gastrectomy and conventional open gastrectomy with special reference to D2 lymph node dissection.

Authors:  Hirohiko Sato; Mitsuo Shimada; Nobuhiro Kurita; Takashi Iwata; Masanori Nishioka; Shinya Morimoto; Kozo Yoshikawa; Tomohiko Miyatani; Masakazu Goto; Hideya Kashihara; Chie Takasu
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-02-04       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Outcomes of minimally invasive surgery for early gastric cancer are comparable with those for open surgery: analysis of 1,013 minimally invasive surgeries at a single institution.

Authors:  Seung-Young Oh; Sebastianus Kwon; Kyung-Goo Lee; Yun-Suhk Suh; Hwi-Nyeong Choe; Seong-Ho Kong; Hyuk-Joon Lee; Woo Ho Kim; Han-Kwang Yang
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2013-11-22       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Comprehension of readmission after laparoscopy assisted distal gastrectomy: what are the causes?

Authors:  Min-Chan Kim; Ki-Han Kim; Yoo-Min Kim; Ghap-Joong Jung
Journal:  Ann Surg Treat Res       Date:  2014-04-24       Impact factor: 1.859

6.  A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials that compared laparoscopy-assisted and open distal gastrectomy for early gastric cancer.

Authors:  Hiroshi Ohtani; Yutaka Tamamori; Kozo Noguchi; Takashi Azuma; Shunsuke Fujimoto; Hiroko Oba; Tetsuya Aoki; Mieko Minami; Kosei Hirakawa
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2010-03-31       Impact factor: 3.452

7.  Reoperation for early postoperative complications after gastric cancer surgery in a Chinese hospital.

Authors:  Birendra Kumar Sah; Ming-Min Chen; Min Yan; Zheng-Gang Zhu
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2010-01-07       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 8.  An evidence-based review of the surgical treatment of gastric adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Ugwuji N Maduekwe; Sam S Yoon
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2011-03-12       Impact factor: 3.452

9.  Institutional variation in short- and long-term outcomes after surgery for gastric or esophagogastric junction adenocarcinoma: correlative study of two randomized phase III trials (JCOG9501 and JCOG9502).

Authors:  Yukinori Kurokawa; Takuhiro Yamaguchi; Mitsuru Sasako; Takeshi Sano; Junki Mizusawa; Kenichi Nakamura; Haruhiko Fukuda
Journal:  Gastric Cancer       Date:  2016-08-27       Impact factor: 7.370

10.  National outcomes and uptake of laparoscopic gastrectomy for cancer in England.

Authors:  Ravikrishna Mamidanna; Alex M Almoudaris; Alex Bottle; Paul Aylin; Omar Faiz; George B Hanna
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2013-04-24       Impact factor: 4.584

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.