| Literature DB >> 30729203 |
Mehmet Cemal Adiguzel1, Belgi Diren Sigirci2, Baran Celik2, Beren Basaran Kahraman2, Kemal Metiner2, Serkan Ikiz2, A Funda Bagcigil2, Seyyal Ak2, N Yakut Ozgur2.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: The study aimed to isolate thermophilic Campylobacter from chickens raised three rearing methods, determine its antimicrobial susceptibilities, and examine resistance-related genes by PCR.Entities:
Keywords: PCR; antimicrobial resistance; chicken; stools; thermophilic Campylobacter
Year: 2018 PMID: 30729203 PMCID: PMC6364164 DOI: 10.2478/jvetres-2018-0071
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Vet Res ISSN: 2450-7393 Impact factor: 1.744
Samples and their origin
| Source | Aim to raise | Rearing method | Use of antibiotics | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Province/District | Number of samples | |||
| Izmir | 1–71 | Broiler | Organic | Unused |
| Sakarya | 72–150 | Broiler | Conventional | Unknown |
| Istanbul | ||||
| Catalca- 1 | 151–166 | Layer hen | Village | Unknown |
| Catalca-2 | 167–175 | Layer hen | Village | Unknown |
| Arnavutkoy-1 | 176–193 | Layer hen | Village | Unknown |
| Arnavutkoy-2 | 194–206 | Layer hen | Village | Unknown |
| Avcilar | 207–220 | Layer hen | Village | Unknown |
Primers and amplicon lengths used in the study
| Target gene | Amplified gene | Primer sequence (5'-3') | Size (bp) | References | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| mPCR | MD16S1 | ATCTAATGGCTTAACCATTAAAC | |||
| MD16S2 | GGACGGTAACTAGTTTAGTATT | 857 | |||
| MDmapA1 | CTATTTTATTTTTGAGTGCTTGTG | ||||
| MDmapA2 | GCTTTATTTGCCATTTGTTTTATTA | 589 | (26) | ||
| COL3 | AATTGAAAATTGCTCCAACTATG | ||||
| MDCOL2 | TGATTTTATTATTTGTAGCAGCG | 462 | |||
| MAMA-PCR | Quinolone resistance gene | CampyMAMAgryA-F | TTTTTAGCAAAGATTCTGAT | ||
| CampyMAMAgyrA-R | CAAAGCATCATAAACTGCAA | 265 | |||
| CampyMAMAgryA1-F | TTTTTAGCAAAGATTCTGAT | (18, 35) | |||
| GZgyrA4 | CAGTATAACGCATCGCAGCG | 368 | |||
| GZgyrACcoli3F-F | TATGAGCGTTATTATCGGTC | 192 | |||
| CampyMAMAgyrA8-R | TAAGGCATCGTAAACAGCCA | ||||
| GZgyrACcoli3F-F | TATGAGCGTTATTATCGGTC | (18, 34) | |||
| GZgyrACcoli4R-R | GTCCATCTACAAGCTCGTTA | 505 | |||
| Erythromycin resistance gene | 23 S rRNA-F | TTAGCTAATGTTGCCCGTACCG | |||
| 23 S rRNA-R | AGCCAACCTTTGTAAGCCTCCG | 697 | |||
| ERY2075-R | TAGTAAAGGTCCACGGGGTCGC | 485 | (3) | ||
| ERY2074-R | AGTAAAGGTCCACGGGGTCTGG | 485 | |||
| GGGACCACCTATGATGTGGAACG | |||||
| Kanamycin resistance gene | CAGGCTTGATCCCCAGTAAGTC | 600 | (15) | ||
| GGCGTTTTGTTTATGTGCG | |||||
| Tetracycline resistance gene | ATGGACAACCCGACAGAAGC | 559 | (22) | ||
| TAGCGGCGTAATAGTAAATAAAC | |||||
| ATAAAGAAATCTGCGTAAATAGGA | 435 | ||||
| AGGCGGTTTTGAAATGTATGTT | |||||
| CmeABC efflux system | TGTGCCGCTGGGAAAAG | 444 | (27) | ||
| CAAGTTGGCGCTGTAGGTGAA | |||||
| CCCCAATGAAAAATAGGCAGAGTA | 431 | ||||
The proportion of thermophilic Campylobacter strains isolated from cloacal and intestinal swab samples
| Rearing method | Sample number | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Village | 70 | 36 (51.4)† | 34 (48.6)‡ | 2 (2.9)‡ |
| Organic | 71 | 66 (93.0)‡ | 64 (90.1)§ | 2 (2.8)‡ |
| Conventional | 79 | 79 (100.0)§ | - | 79 (100.0)§ |
| Total (%) | 220 | 181 (82.3) | 98 (44.6) | 83 (37.7) |
Resistance rates of thermophilic Campylobacter isolates according to the method of raising
| Isolate | Antibiotic | Resistance status | Resistant isolates (%) | Chi-squared (P value) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Village-raised (n = 34) | Organic (n = 64) | Conventional (n = 0) | ||||
| Tetracycline | Resistant | 13 (38.2)† | 64 (100.0)‡ | - | 50,310 (<0.001) | |
| Non-resistant | 21 (61.8) | 0 (0.0) | - | |||
| Ciprofloxacin | Resistant | 22 (64.7)† | 64 (100.0)‡ | - | (<0.001)* | |
| Non-resistant | 12 (35.3) | 0 (0.0) | - | |||
| Nalidixic acid | Resistant | 17 (50.0)† | 63 (98.4)‡ | - | 34,744 (<0.001) | |
| Non-resistant | 17 (50.0) | 1 (1.6) | - | |||
| Kanamycin | Resistant | - | - | - | - | |
| Gentamycin | Resistant | - | - | - | - | |
| Erythromycin | Resistant | - | - | - | - | |
| Isolate | Antibiotic | Resistance status | Village-raised (n = 2) | Organic (n = 2) | Conventional (n = 79) | Chi-squared (P value) |
| Tetracycline | Resistant | - | - | - | - | |
| Ciprofloxacin | Resistant | 2 (100.0)† | 1 (50.0)§ | 79 (100.0)‡ | (0.048)** | |
| Non-resistant | 0 (0.0) | 1 (50.0) | 0 (0.0) | |||
| Nalidixic acid | Resistant | 2 (100.0)† | - | 51 (64.6)† | (0.542)* | |
| Non-resistant | 0 (0.0) | 28 (35.4) | ||||
| Kanamycin | Resistant | - | - | - | - | |
| Gentamycin | Resistant | - | - | - | - | |
| Erythromycin | Resistant | - | - | - | - | |
| Total | 36 | 66 | 79 | |||
The statistical difference between the ratios with different symbols in the same column is significant (P < 0.05)
†, ‡, § The statistical difference between the ratios bearing different symbols on the same line is significant
* Fisher’s exact test value was applied because cells have expected count less than 5
** Fisher’s exact test for a 2×3 contingency table was applied