Literature DB >> 16672508

Effect of conventional and organic production practices on the prevalence and antimicrobial resistance of Campylobacter spp. in poultry.

Taradon Luangtongkum1, Teresa Y Morishita, Aaron J Ison, Shouxiong Huang, Patrick F McDermott, Qijing Zhang.   

Abstract

Intestinal tracts of broilers and turkeys from 10 conventional broiler farms and 10 conventional turkey farms, where antimicrobials were routinely used, and from 5 organic broiler farms and 5 organic turkey farms, where antimicrobials had never been used, were collected and cultured for Campylobacter species. A total of 694 Campylobacter isolates from the conventional and organic poultry operations were tested for antimicrobial resistance to nine antimicrobial agents by the agar dilution method. Although Campylobacter species were highly prevalent in both the conventional and organic poultry operations, the antimicrobial resistance rates were significantly different between the organic operations and the conventional operations. Less than 2% of Campylobacter strains isolated from organically raised poultry were resistant to fluoroquinolones, while 46% and 67% of Campylobacter isolates from conventionally raised broilers and conventionally raised turkeys, respectively, were resistant to these antimicrobials. In addition, a high frequency of resistance to erythromycin (80%), clindamycin (64%), kanamycin (76%), and ampicillin (31%) was observed among Campylobacter isolates from conventionally raised turkeys. None of the Campylobacter isolates obtained in this study was resistant to gentamicin, while a large number of the isolates from both conventional and organic poultry operations were resistant to tetracycline. Multidrug resistance was observed mainly among Campylobacter strains isolated from the conventional turkey operation (81%). Findings from this study clearly indicate the influence of conventional and organic poultry production practices on antimicrobial resistance of Campylobacter on poultry farms.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16672508      PMCID: PMC1472326          DOI: 10.1128/AEM.72.5.3600-3607.2006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol        ISSN: 0099-2240            Impact factor:   4.792


  37 in total

1.  Antimicrobial use and resistance in animals.

Authors:  Scott A McEwen; Paula J Fedorka-Cray
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2002-06-01       Impact factor: 9.079

Review 2.  Sources of Campylobacter colonization in broiler chickens.

Authors:  D G Newell; C Fearnley
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 4.792

3.  Antimicrobial resistance of Campylobacter jejuni and Campylobacter coli isolates from broiler chickens isolated at an Irish poultry processing plant.

Authors:  R Fallon; N O'Sullivan; M Maher; C Carroll
Journal:  Lett Appl Microbiol       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 2.858

Review 4.  Campylobacter colonization in poultry: sources of infection and modes of transmission.

Authors:  Orhan Sahin; Teresa Y Morishita; Qijing Zhang
Journal:  Anim Health Res Rev       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 2.615

5.  Effect of broiler age, feed withdrawal, and transportation on levels of coliforms, Campylobacter, Escherichia coli and Salmonella on carcasses before and after immersion chilling.

Authors:  J K Northcutt; M E Berrang; J A Dickens; D L Fletcher; N A Cox
Journal:  Poult Sci       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 3.352

6.  Enhanced in vivo fitness of fluoroquinolone-resistant Campylobacter jejuni in the absence of antibiotic selection pressure.

Authors:  Naidan Luo; Sonia Pereira; Orhan Sahin; Jun Lin; Shouxiong Huang; Linda Michel; Qijing Zhang
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-01-05       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Tetracycline antibiotics: mode of action, applications, molecular biology, and epidemiology of bacterial resistance.

Authors:  I Chopra; M Roberts
Journal:  Microbiol Mol Biol Rev       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 11.056

Review 8.  Antimicrobial resistance of foodborne pathogens.

Authors:  David G White; Shaohua Zhao; Shabbir Simjee; David D Wagner; Patrick F McDermott
Journal:  Microbes Infect       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 2.700

9.  Resistance to quinolones in Campylobacter jejuni and Campylobacter coli from Danish broilers at farm level.

Authors:  K Pedersen; A Wedderkopp
Journal:  J Appl Microbiol       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 3.772

10.  Increasing fluoroquinolone resistance in Campylobacter jejuni, Pennsylvania, USA,1982-2001.

Authors:  Irving Nachamkin; Huong Ung; Ming Li
Journal:  Emerg Infect Dis       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 6.883

View more
  56 in total

1.  Longitudinal study of the persistence of antimicrobial-resistant campylobacter strains in distinct Swine production systems on farms, at slaughter, and in the environment.

Authors:  Macarena P Quintana-Hayashi; Siddhartha Thakur
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2012-02-03       Impact factor: 4.792

2.  Changes in multidrug resistance of enteric bacteria following an intervention to reduce antimicrobial resistance in dairy calves.

Authors:  John B Kaneene; Lorin D Warnick; Carole A Bolin; Ronald J Erskine; Katherine May; Roseann Miller
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2009-10-21       Impact factor: 5.948

3.  Protozoan Cysts Act as a Survival Niche and Protective Shelter for Foodborne Pathogenic Bacteria.

Authors:  Ellen Lambrecht; Julie Baré; Natascha Chavatte; Wim Bert; Koen Sabbe; Kurt Houf
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2015-06-12       Impact factor: 4.792

4.  Chromosomal tet(O)-harboring regions in Campylobacter coli isolates from turkeys and swine.

Authors:  M D Crespo; J W Olson; E Altermann; R M Siletzky; S Kathariou
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2012-09-28       Impact factor: 4.792

5.  Impaired fitness and transmission of macrolide-resistant Campylobacter jejuni in its natural host.

Authors:  Taradon Luangtongkum; Zhangqi Shen; Virginia W Seng; Orhan Sahin; Byeonghwa Jeon; Peng Liu; Qijing Zhang
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2011-12-19       Impact factor: 5.191

6.  Phenotypic and genotypic diversity of thermophilic Campylobacter spp. in commercial turkey flocks: a longitudinal study.

Authors:  Isaac P Kashoma; Anand Kumar; Yasser M Sanad; Wondwossen Gebreyes; Rudovick R Kazwala; Rebecca Garabed; Gireesh Rajashekara
Journal:  Foodborne Pathog Dis       Date:  2014-09-03       Impact factor: 3.171

7.  The absence of intervening sequences in 23S rRNA genes of Campylobacter coli isolates from Turkeys is a unique attribute of a cluster of related strains which also lack resistance to erythromycin.

Authors:  Kamfai Chan; William G Miller; Robert E Mandrell; Sophia Kathariou
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2006-12-22       Impact factor: 4.792

8.  Differences in methylation at GATC sites in genomic DNA of Campylobacter coli from turkeys and swine.

Authors:  Sandra Wright; Simone Wilson; William G Miller; Robert E Mandrell; Robin M Siletzky; Sophia Kathariou
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2010-09-10       Impact factor: 4.792

9.  Proximity to Other Commercial Turkey Farms Affects Colonization Onset, Genotypes, and Antimicrobial Resistance Profiles of Campylobacter spp. in Turkeys: Suggestive Evidence from a Paired-Farm Model.

Authors:  Jeffrey A Niedermeyer; Lynde Ring; William G Miller; Seiche Genger; Christina Parr Lindsey; Jason Osborne; Sophia Kathariou
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2018-08-31       Impact factor: 4.792

10.  Antimicrobial resistance profiling and molecular subtyping of Campylobacter spp. from processed turkey.

Authors:  Ellen M Lutgen; John M McEvoy; Julie S Sherwood; Catherine M Logue
Journal:  BMC Microbiol       Date:  2009-09-21       Impact factor: 3.605

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.