S Vijayakumar Jain1, M R Muthusekhar2, M F Baig2, P Senthilnathan2, S Loganathan2, P U Abdul Wahab2, M Madhulakshmi2, Yogaen Vohra3. 1. 1Present Address: Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Sri Hasanamba Dental College and Hospital, Hassan, Karnataka 573202 India. 2. 2Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Saveetha University, 162, Poonamallee High Road, Velappanchavadi, Chennai, Tamil Nadu 600077 India. 3. New Delhi, 110060 India.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Orthognathic surgery involves movement of jaws in all three planes, and this being a part of airway complex, displacement of jaws can influence the dimension of airway at all levels. Lefort one osteotomy surgery with superior repositioning is a common procedure done for patients with vertical maxillary excess. PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the three-dimensional volumetric changes in airway after lefort one impaction surgery using three-dimensional cone beam computed tomography (3D-CBCT) in patients with vertical maxillary excess (VME). METHODS: A prospective analysis of 15 patients who underwent isolated lefort one impaction surgery was done with pre-operative (T0) and 3-months (T1) post-operative 3D-CBCT scans. Airway was divided into three segments, nasopharyngeal, velopharyngeal and oropharyngeal. Volumetric analysis of all these segments was done before and after surgery. Paired 't test' was used to assess the mean difference in airway volume and area between T0 and T1. One-way ANOVA was used to check the mean percentage difference in airway volume and area among the three segments. RESULTS: The mean percentage of nasopharyngeal volume difference was - 0.6299 ± 0.9146%, velopharyngeal volume difference was - 0.5205 ± 1.107%, oropharyngeal volume difference was - 1.492 ± 2.745%. Though volume and area of pharyngeal airway were decreased after maxillary impaction surgery in all three segments of airway studied, they were not statistically significant. CONCLUSION: Among the three segments of airway studied, oropharyngeal airway volume has shown the highest post-surgical reduction though statistically insignificant. ESS scores were within normal limits. Hence, we are of the opinion that there is lack of evidence to conclude that the patients undergoing lefort one superior repositioning for the treatment of VME might develop significant narrowing of PAS that may predispose the patient to breathing disorders.
BACKGROUND: Orthognathic surgery involves movement of jaws in all three planes, and this being a part of airway complex, displacement of jaws can influence the dimension of airway at all levels. Lefort one osteotomy surgery with superior repositioning is a common procedure done for patients with vertical maxillary excess. PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the three-dimensional volumetric changes in airway after lefort one impaction surgery using three-dimensional cone beam computed tomography (3D-CBCT) in patients with vertical maxillary excess (VME). METHODS: A prospective analysis of 15 patients who underwent isolated lefort one impaction surgery was done with pre-operative (T0) and 3-months (T1) post-operative 3D-CBCT scans. Airway was divided into three segments, nasopharyngeal, velopharyngeal and oropharyngeal. Volumetric analysis of all these segments was done before and after surgery. Paired 't test' was used to assess the mean difference in airway volume and area between T0 and T1. One-way ANOVA was used to check the mean percentage difference in airway volume and area among the three segments. RESULTS: The mean percentage of nasopharyngeal volume difference was - 0.6299 ± 0.9146%, velopharyngeal volume difference was - 0.5205 ± 1.107%, oropharyngeal volume difference was - 1.492 ± 2.745%. Though volume and area of pharyngeal airway were decreased after maxillary impaction surgery in all three segments of airway studied, they were not statistically significant. CONCLUSION: Among the three segments of airway studied, oropharyngeal airway volume has shown the highest post-surgical reduction though statistically insignificant. ESS scores were within normal limits. Hence, we are of the opinion that there is lack of evidence to conclude that the patients undergoing lefort one superior repositioning for the treatment of VME might develop significant narrowing of PAS that may predispose the patient to breathing disorders.
Entities:
Keywords:
Lefort one superior repositioning; Maxillary impaction surgery; Pharyngeal airway volume
Authors: Julian J Armstrong; Matthew S Leigh; David D Sampson; Jennifer H Walsh; David R Hillman; Peter R Eastwood Journal: Am J Respir Crit Care Med Date: 2005-10-20 Impact factor: 21.405
Authors: Lane F Donnelly; Victoria Surdulescu; Barbara A Chini; Keith A Casper; Stacy A Poe; Raouf S Amin Journal: Radiology Date: 2003-02-28 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: K Degerliyurt; K Ueki; Y Hashiba; K Marukawa; B Simsek; K Okabe; K Nakagawa; E Yamamoto Journal: Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg Date: 2009-02-23 Impact factor: 2.789
Authors: M Bret Abbott; Lane F Donnelly; Bernard J Dardzinski; Stacy A Poe; Barbara A Chini; Raouf S Amin Journal: Radiology Date: 2004-09 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Hung Hsiag Tso; Janice S Lee; John C Huang; Koutaro Maki; David Hatcher; Arthur J Miller Journal: Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod Date: 2009-08-28