PURPOSE: To compare the patterns of dynamic airway motion depicted on cine magnetic resonance (MR) images obtained during sleep between young patients with and those without obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fast gradient-echo sequences were performed in the sagittal midline by using a 1.5-T unit to create cine MR images. Cine MR images obtained during sleep in 16 young patients with OSA were compared with those obtained in 16 young patients with no airway symptoms of airway disease. The nasopharynx, oropharynx, and hypopharynx were characterized in terms of airway motion as static patent (SP), dynamic patent, intermittent collapsed (IC), or static collapsed (SC); and the maximal diameter and greatest change in diameter (in millimeters) of these airways were calculated. Adenoid tonsil size and mouth position (ie, opened or closed) were determined. Differences in the frequency of MR imaging parameters in the different anatomic regions were evaluated by using Fisher exact, chi 2, and sample t tests. RESULTS: There were statistically significant differences in the following parameters between the two groups: nasopharynx SP (P <.001) and IC (P <.001); hypopharynx SP (P <.001) and IC (P <.001); and mean change in airway diameter of the nasopharynx (P <.001) and hypopharynx (P <.001). The mean adenoid tonsil size in the patients with OSA was larger (P =.006). CONCLUSION: There are significant differences in the patterns of dynamic airway motion between young patients with and those without OSA.
PURPOSE: To compare the patterns of dynamic airway motion depicted on cine magnetic resonance (MR) images obtained during sleep between young patients with and those without obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fast gradient-echo sequences were performed in the sagittal midline by using a 1.5-T unit to create cine MR images. Cine MR images obtained during sleep in 16 young patients with OSA were compared with those obtained in 16 young patients with no airway symptoms of airway disease. The nasopharynx, oropharynx, and hypopharynx were characterized in terms of airway motion as static patent (SP), dynamic patent, intermittent collapsed (IC), or static collapsed (SC); and the maximal diameter and greatest change in diameter (in millimeters) of these airways were calculated. Adenoid tonsil size and mouth position (ie, opened or closed) were determined. Differences in the frequency of MR imaging parameters in the different anatomic regions were evaluated by using Fisher exact, chi 2, and sample t tests. RESULTS: There were statistically significant differences in the following parameters between the two groups: nasopharynx SP (P <.001) and IC (P <.001); hypopharynx SP (P <.001) and IC (P <.001); and mean change in airway diameter of the nasopharynx (P <.001) and hypopharynx (P <.001). The mean adenoid tonsil size in the patients with OSA was larger (P =.006). CONCLUSION: There are significant differences in the patterns of dynamic airway motion between young patients with and those without OSA.
Authors: Raanan Arens; Sanghun Sin; Joseph M McDonough; John M Palmer; Troy Dominguez; Heiko Meyer; David M Wootton; Allan I Pack Journal: Am J Respir Crit Care Med Date: 2005-03-04 Impact factor: 21.405
Authors: Ana Célia Faria; Savio Nogueira da Silva-Junior; Luis Vicente Garcia; Antonio Carlos dos Santos; Maria Regina França Fernandes; Francisco Veríssimo de Mello-Filho Journal: Sleep Breath Date: 2012-05-06 Impact factor: 2.816
Authors: Carole L Marcus; Richard J H Smith; Leila A Mankarious; Raanan Arens; Gordon S Mitchell; Ravindhra G Elluru; Vito Forte; Steven Goudy; Ethylin W Jabs; Alex A Kane; Eliot Katz; David Paydarfar; Kevin Pereira; Roger H Reeves; Joan T Richtsmeier; Ramon L Ruiz; Bradley T Thach; David E Tunkel; Jeffrey A Whitsett; David Wootton; Carol J Blaisdell Journal: Proc Am Thorac Soc Date: 2009-09-15
Authors: T Verse; R Bodlaj; R de la Chaux; A Dreher; C Heiser; M Herzog; W Hohenhorst; K Hörmann; O Kaschke; T Kühnel; N Mahl; J T Maurer; W Pirsig; K Rohde; A Sauter; M Schedler; R Siegert; A Steffen; B A Stuck Journal: HNO Date: 2009-11 Impact factor: 1.284
Authors: Robert J Fleck; Stacey L Ishman; Sally R Shott; Ephraim J Gutmark; Keith B McConnell; Mohamed Mahmoud; Goutham Mylavarapu; Dhananjay R Subramaniam; Rhonda Szczesniak; Raouf S Amin Journal: J Clin Sleep Med Date: 2017-02-15 Impact factor: 4.062
Authors: Anna C Bitners; Sanghun Sin; Sabhyata Agrawal; Seonjoo Lee; Jayaram K Udupa; Yubing Tong; David M Wootton; Kok Ren Choy; Mark E Wagshul; Raanan Arens Journal: Sleep Date: 2020-10-13 Impact factor: 5.849
Authors: Bradley L Fricke; M Bret Abbott; Lane F Donnelly; Bernard J Dardzinski; Stacy A Poe; Maninder Kalra; Raouf S Amin; Robin T Cotton Journal: Korean J Radiol Date: 2007 Nov-Dec Impact factor: 3.500