AIM: The aim of this study was to evaluate the upper airway changes after simultaneous maxillary advancement/impaction and mandibular setback in skeletal Class III malocclusion. METHODS: The subjects included 76 patients whose treatment included 1-piece LeFort I and bilateral sagittal split osteotomies. Lateral cephalograms were taken before surgery and 2 months and 3 years postoperatively. In order to analyze the effect of maxillary repositioning, the material was divided into subgroups according to whether the maxillary impaction and advancement were clinically significant (≥2 mm) or not. RESULTS: Advancement of the maxilla with or without impaction resulted in a significant long-term increase (P <0.001) in airway dimension at the nasopharyngeal level (13%-21% increase). At the oropharyngeal and retrolingual levels, a decrease took place but was significant (P <0.05) only at the oropharyngeal level when the maxilla was not impacted. When the maxilla was not advanced, there was no significant change, except at the hypopharyngeal level (12% decrease) (P <0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Clinically significant advancement (≥2 mm) of the maxilla significantly increased the airway dimension at the nasopharyngeal level and to some extent compensated for the effect of mandibular setback at the hypopharyngeal level.
AIM: The aim of this study was to evaluate the upper airway changes after simultaneous maxillary advancement/impaction and mandibular setback in skeletal Class III malocclusion. METHODS: The subjects included 76 patients whose treatment included 1-piece LeFort I and bilateral sagittal split osteotomies. Lateral cephalograms were taken before surgery and 2 months and 3 years postoperatively. In order to analyze the effect of maxillary repositioning, the material was divided into subgroups according to whether the maxillary impaction and advancement were clinically significant (≥2 mm) or not. RESULTS: Advancement of the maxilla with or without impaction resulted in a significant long-term increase (P <0.001) in airway dimension at the nasopharyngeal level (13%-21% increase). At the oropharyngeal and retrolingual levels, a decrease took place but was significant (P <0.05) only at the oropharyngeal level when the maxilla was not impacted. When the maxilla was not advanced, there was no significant change, except at the hypopharyngeal level (12% decrease) (P <0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Clinically significant advancement (≥2 mm) of the maxilla significantly increased the airway dimension at the nasopharyngeal level and to some extent compensated for the effect of mandibular setback at the hypopharyngeal level.
Authors: S Vijayakumar Jain; M R Muthusekhar; M F Baig; P Senthilnathan; S Loganathan; P U Abdul Wahab; M Madhulakshmi; Yogaen Vohra Journal: J Maxillofac Oral Surg Date: 2018-05-08