Literature DB >> 30726559

Whose Risk? Why Did the U.S. Public Ignore Information About the Ebola Outbreak?

Janet Z Yang.   

Abstract

To test a possible boundary condition for the risk information seeking and processing (RISP) model, this study experimentally manipulates risk perception related to the 2014 Ebola outbreak in a nationally representative sample. Multiple-group structural equation modeling results indicate that psychological distance was negatively related to systematic processing in the high-risk condition. In the low-risk condition, psychological distance was positively related to heuristic processing; negative attitude toward media coverage dampened people's need for information, which subsequently influenced information processing. Risk perception elicited more fear, which led to greater information insufficiency and more heuristic processing in the low-risk condition. In contrast, sadness was consistently related to information processing in both conditions. Model fit statistics also show that the RISP model provides a better fit to data when risk perception is elevated. Further, this study contributes to our understanding of the role of discrete emotions in motivating information processing.
© 2019 Society for Risk Analysis.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Fear; information processing; psychological distance; risk perception; sadness

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30726559     DOI: 10.1111/risa.13282

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Risk Anal        ISSN: 0272-4332            Impact factor:   4.000


  8 in total

1.  Death Narratives, Negative Emotion, and Counterarguing: Testing Fear, Anger, and Sadness as Mechanisms of Effect.

Authors:  Helen M Lillie; Jakob D Jensen; Manusheela Pokharel; Sean J Upshaw
Journal:  J Health Commun       Date:  2021-09-27

2.  Social values, self- and collective efficacy explaining behaviours in coping with Covid-19: Self-interested consumption and physical distancing in the first 10 days of confinement in Spain.

Authors:  Carmen Tabernero; Rosario Castillo-Mayén; Bárbara Luque; Esther Cuadrado
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-09-17       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Fast and Frugal: Information Processing Related to The Coronavirus Pandemic.

Authors:  Jody Chin Sing Wong; Janet Zheng Yang; Zhuling Liu; David Lee; Zhiying Yue
Journal:  Risk Anal       Date:  2021-01-23       Impact factor: 4.302

4.  Political affiliation moderates subjective interpretations of COVID-19 graphs.

Authors:  Jonathan D Ericson; William S Albert; Ja-Nae Duane
Journal:  Big Data Soc       Date:  2022-03-04

5.  From warning messages to preparedness behavior: The role of risk perception and information interaction in the Covid-19 pandemic.

Authors:  Yanan Guo; Shi An; Tina Comes
Journal:  Int J Disaster Risk Reduct       Date:  2022-03-03       Impact factor: 4.842

6.  Capturing the Interplay between Risk Perception and Social Media Posting to Support Risk Response and Decision Making.

Authors:  Huiyun Zhu; Kecheng Liu
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-05-14       Impact factor: 3.390

7.  Understanding the Community Risk Perceptions of the COVID-19 Outbreak in South Korea: Infodemiology Study.

Authors:  Atina Husnayain; Eunha Shim; Anis Fuad; Emily Chia-Yu Su
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2020-09-29       Impact factor: 5.428

8.  The Evolving Field of Risk Communication.

Authors:  Dominic Balog-Way; Katherine McComas; John Besley
Journal:  Risk Anal       Date:  2020-10-20       Impact factor: 4.000

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.