| Literature DB >> 30726274 |
Leonor Parreira1,2, Rita Marinheiro2, Pedro Carmo1, Pedro Amador2, Dinis Mesquita2, José Farinha2, Diogo Cavaco1, Rafael Jeronimo1, Francisco Costa1, Pedro Adragão1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Discrete potentials, low voltage and fragmented electrograms, have been previously reported at ablation site, in patients with premature ventricular contractions (PVCs) originating in the right ventricular outflow tract (RVOT). The aim of this study was to review the electrograms at ablation site and assess the presence of diastolic potentials and their association with success.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2019 PMID: 30726274 PMCID: PMC6364967 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0211232
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Fig 1Diastolic potentials.
Representative intracardiac electrograms at a successful ablation sites of 3 different patients. The MAPd exhibits the diastolic potentials (arrow head), occurring after the T wave of the surface ECG in sinus rhythm, becoming pre-QRS during the PVCs. The gain in the ablation catheter is 20 mm/1mV and sweep speed is 100 mm/sec. (A), fragmented diastolic potential preceding the QRS by -100 ms; (B) sharp diastolic potential preceding the QRS by—60 ms. (C) dull diastolic potential preceding the QRS by -20 ms. In panel B and C the local electrogram in sinus rhythm displays normal amplitude and duration. In Panel A the local electrogram shows low voltage and prolonged duration.
Fig 2Fragmented electrograms.
Intracardiac electrograms at successful ablation site. The bipolar electrogram on the ablation catheter (MAPd) exhibits a typical fragmented electrogram, diastolic potentials are also present (arrow heads). The fragmented electrogram shows low voltage and prolonged duration, 220 ms, but ending before the end of the QRS.
Baseline characteristics of the studied patients.
| Overall sample | Successful procedure | Unsuccessful procedure | P value | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age (years) | 40 (31–56) | 40 (33–50) | 53(19–61) | 0.609 |
| Male gender, n (%) | 18 (38) | 13 (33) | 5 (62) | 0.132 |
| Family history of sudden death, n (%) | 2 (4) | 2 (5) | 0 | 0.9999 |
| Absence of risk factors, n (%) | 39 (81) | 34 (85) | 5 (63) | 0.330 |
| Strenuous exercise, n (%) | 5 (10) | 3 (8) | 2 (25) | 0.189 |
| Asymptomatic, n (%) | 4 (8) | 2 (5) | 2 (25) | 0.124 |
| Syncope/near syncope n (%) | 7 (14) | 5 (13) | 2 (25) | 0.330 |
| Palpitations, n (%) | 43 (89) | 37 (93) | 6 (75) | 0.189 |
| Betablockers, n (%) | 24 (50) | 21 (53) | 3 (38) | 0.701 |
| Antiarrhythmics, n (%) | 11 (23) | 8 (20) | 3 (38) | 0.361 |
| T wave inversion after V1, n (%) | 8 (17) | 6 (15) | 2 (25) | 0.605 |
| Exercise induced increase in PVCs frequency, n (%) | 6 (21) | 6 (15) | 0 | 0.542 |
| N° of PVCs/24 hours | 18250 (15000–24000) | 18000 (15000–24000) | 19250 (15750–23000) | 0.857 |
| NSVT n (%) | 6 (12) | 6 (15) | 0 | 0.571 |
| Mapping system (CARTO/EnSite), n | 35/13 | 29/11 | 6/2 | 0.9999 |
| EAS RVOT free wall, n (%) | 15 (31) | 11 (27) | 4 (50) | 0.236 |
| EAS RVOT septum, n (%) | 33 (69) | 29 (73) | 4 (50) | 0.236 |
| Number of points in the map | 67 (50–94) | 64 (50–94 | 70 (52–95) | 0.782 |
| Number of RF pulses | 2 (1–4) | 2 (1–3.75) | 4.5 (4–6) | 0.0001 |
Values are presented as median (interquartile range) and number (%). EAS, earliest activation site; NSVT, non-sustained ventricular tachycardia; PVCs, premature ventricular contraction; RF, radiofrequency; RVOT, right ventricular outflow tract.
a p values were calculated using Mann-Whitney-U test for continuous variables and the chi-square test for categorical variables.
Mapping and ablation data.
| LAT (ms) | -30 (-20 to -44) | - 54 (-35 to -77) | - 27 (-16 to-38) | <0.0001 |
| Amplitude of local electrogram (mV) | 1 (0.5–2) | 1 (0.45–1.15) | 1.5 (0.5–2.1) | 0.006 |
| Duration of local electrogram (ms) | 80 (64–100) | 106 (80–154) | 74 (60–90) | <0.0001 |
| Presence of diastolic potentials, n (%) | 39 (29) | 31 (76) | 8 (9) | <0.0001 |
| Presence of fragmented electrograms, n (%) | 32 (24) | 22 (54) | 10 (11) | <0.0001 |
| LAT (ms) | -30 (-20 to -44) | - 54 (-34 to -74) | - 27 (-16 to -38) | <0.0001 |
| Amplitude of local electrogram (mV) | 1 (0.5–2) | 1 (0.5–1.5) | 1.1 (0.5–2) | 0.037 |
| Duration of local electrogram (ms) | 80 (64–100) | 120 (80–160) | 74 (60–90) | <0.0001 |
| Presence of fragmented electrograms, n (%) | 32 (24) | 21 (54) | 11(12) | <0.0001 |
| Success, n (%) | 40 (30) | 31 (80) | 10 (11) | <0.0001 |
Values are presented as median (interquartile range) and number (%). DP, diastolic potentials; LAT: local activation time.
a p values were calculated using Mann-Whitney-U test for continuous variables and the chi-square test for categorical variables;
Univariable and multivariable logistic regression analysis.
| Univariable analysis | Multivariable analysis | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| OR (95% CI) | P valuea | OR (95% CI) | P value | |
| LAT (ms) | 1.123 (1.075–1.173) | <0.0001 | 1.11 (1.049–1.172) | <0.0001 |
| Amplitude of local electrogram (mVx10-1) | 0.940 (0.899–0.982) | 0.006 | 0.949 (0.899–1.028) | 0.198 |
| Duration of local electrogram (ms) | 1.031 (1.017–1.044) | <0.0001 | 0.996 (0.974–1.017) | 0.692 |
| Presence of diastolic potentials | 32.9 (11.9–91) | <0.0001 | 15.5 (3.92–61.2) | <0.0001 |
| Presence of fragmented electrograms | 9.6 (3.9–23.6) | <0.0001 | 1.707 (0.296–9.848) | 0.550 |
CI: confidence interval; LAT: local activation time; OR: odds ratio
a p values were calculated using univariable and multivariable logistic regression analysis
Characteristics of the diastolic potentials at RF delivery site.
| Patient (RF | DP amplitude | QRS-DP (ms) | PVC | SR | Success | Morphology | Local electrogram |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| pulse) | (mV) | DP–QRS (ms) | DP-QRS (ms) | RF pulse | amplitude (mV) | ||
| 1(1) | 0.2 | 400 | 128 | 500 | yes | Fragmented | 1.3 |
| 2(1) | 0.2 | 280 | 100 | 800 | yes | Sharp | 3.5 |
| 4(5) | 0.1 | 380 | 10 | 300 | yes | Dull | 0.5 |
| 5(1) | 0.1 | 360 | 94 | 430 | yes | Dull | 1 |
| 7(2) | 0.1 | 400 | 74 | 450 | yes | Dull | 1 |
| 9(1) | 0.1 | 400 | 72 | 400 | yes | Fragmented | 2 |
| 11(1) | 0.1 | 400 | 60 | 500 | yes | Fragmented | 1.1 |
| 12(3) | 0.1 | 360 | 10 | 330 | no | Dull | 1 |
| 12(4) | 0.1 | 360 | 10 | 380 | no | Dull | 0.3 |
| 12(5) | 0.1 | 360 | 52 | 300 | yes | dull | 0.3 |
| 14(1) | 0.5 | 360 | 32 | 500 | yes | Fragmented | 3 |
| 17(1) | 0.2 | 300 | 26 | 320 | yes | Fragmented | 0.6 |
| 21(2) | 0.6 | 220 | 50 | 340 | yes | Sharp | 1.5 |
| 22(1) | 0.3 | 340 | 64 | 380 | yes | Fragmented | 0,4 |
| 23(1) | 0.2 | 400 | 40 | 400 | no | Sharp | 2.2 |
| 23(2) | 0.3 | 400 | 30 | 500 | no | Sharp | 1.5 |
| 23(3) | 0.1 | 400 | 96 | 450 | yes | Sharp | 0.2 |
| 24(2) | 0.1 | 360 | 70 | 360 | no | Dull | 1.7 |
| 24(4) | 0.1 | 360 | 80 | 400 | yes | Dull | 0.5 |
| 25(2) | 0.2 | 320 | 80 | 350 | yes | Fragmented | 1 |
| 27(2) | 0,1 | 400 | 30 | 420 | yes | Fragmented | 1 |
| 29(3) | 0.6 | 400 | 42 | 320 | no | Sharp | 0,5 |
| 29(4) | 0.5 | 400 | 52 | 420 | yes | Sharp | 0.4 |
| 30(2) | 0.2 | 180 | 60 | 200 | yes | Dull | 1 |
| 32(1) | 0.3 | 420 | 100 | 400 | yes | Dull | 1.5 |
| 33(1) | 0.2 | 240 | 60 | 450 | yes | Sharp | 1.2 |
| 35(2) | 0.6 | 400 | 60 | 360 | yes | Sharp | 0.5 |
| 35(3) | 0.3 | 400 | 14 | 320 | yes | Sharp | 0.5 |
| 38(3) | 0.1 | 380 | 60 | 300 | yes | Dull | 0.3 |
| 39(2) | 0.1 | 300 | 55 | 260 | yes | Dull | 0,5 |
| 41(1) | 0.1 | 300 | 100 | 200 | yes | Dull | 0.5 |
| 42(1) | 0.1 | 360 | 25 | 400 | no | Dull | 1 |
| 42(5) | 0.1 | 360 | 100 | 400 | yes | Dull | 0,2 |
| 43(1) | 0.1 | 200 | 22 | 200 | no | Dull | 2 |
| 43(2) | 0.1 | 200 | 30 | 200 | yes | Dull | 1 |
| 44(4) | 0.1 | 350 | 100 | 650 | yes | Fragmented | 2 |
| 45(4) | 0.5 | 400 | 64 | 320 | yes | Dull | 0,1 |
| 46(1) | 0.2 | 300 | 20 | 350 | yes | Fragmented | 0,4 |
| 48(1) | 0.1 | 350 | 20 | 400 | yes | Dull | 0.5 |
DP: diastolic potential; QRS-DP: interval between the end of the previous sinus QRS and the DP; PVC DP-QRS: interval between the DP and the QRS of the PVC; SR DP-QRS: interval between the DP and the QRS in sinus rhythm; PVC: premature ventricular contraction; RF: radiofrequency; SR: sinus rhythm.
Fig 3Variation in the inter diastolic potentials interval leading to a variation in the inter PVC interval.
Intracardiac electrogram at successful ablation site. The bipolar electrogram on the ablation catheter (MAPd) exhibits sharp diastolic potentials (arrow head) after the T wave of the surface ECG in sinus rhythm, becoming pre-QRS during the PVCs. The variation of the interval between consecutive diastolic potentials is accompanied by a variation in the interval between the consecutive PVCs.
Fig 4Low voltage areas.
35 years old female (patient 48) showing abnormal electrograms at ablation site despite apparent absence of structural heart disease. (A) Cardiac magnetic resonance steady-state free-procession (SSFP) cine imaging in the in-out view of the right ventricle in diastole (A1) and systole (A2) showing no abnormalities. (B) Electroanatomical voltage map in sinus rhythm. The black line indicates the pulmonary valve. The voltage map showing a wide area of low voltage below the pulmonary valve. The color map of voltage signals is explained in the methods. Purple indicates normal tissue while red indicates scar. Decapolar catheter in the coronary sinus and the His bundle catheter are displayed in white and red, respectively, at the bottom of the figure. The ablation catheter at the ablation site is indicated by the white arrow head. One RF ablation at this site caused the disappearance of the PVCs, indicated by the red dots. (C) The bipolar electrogram on the ablation catheter (MAPd) at successful ablation site exhibits very low voltage electrograms and dull diastolic potentials (black arrow heads) in sinus rhythm preceding the QRS by -20 ms during the PVC.