Literature DB >> 30725245

Using Participatory Design to Inform the Connected and Open Research Ethics (CORE) Commons.

John Harlow1, Nadir Weibel2, Rasheed Al Kotob3, Vincent Chan2, Cinnamon Bloss4, Rubi Linares-Orozco5, Michelle Takemoto4, Camille Nebeker6.   

Abstract

Mobile health (mHealth) research involving pervasive sensors, mobile apps and other novel data collection tools and methods present new ethical, legal, and social challenges specific to informed consent, data management and bystander rights. To address these challenges, a participatory design approach was deployed whereby stakeholders contributed to the development of a web-based commons to support the mHealth research community including researchers and ethics board members. The CORE (Connected and Open Research Ethics) platform now features a community forum, a resource library and a network of nearly 600 global members. The utility of the participatory design process was evaluated by analyzing activities carried out over an 8-month design phase consisting of 86 distinct events including iterative design deliberations and social media engagement. This article describes how participatory design yielded 55 new features directly mapped to community needs and discusses relationships to user engagement as demonstrated by a steady increase in CORE member activity and followers on Twitter.

Keywords:  Digital medicine; IRB; Participatory design; Pervasive technology; Research ethics; mHealth

Year:  2019        PMID: 30725245     DOI: 10.1007/s11948-019-00086-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics        ISSN: 1353-3452            Impact factor:   3.525


  16 in total

Review 1.  A Survey of Mobile Phone Sensing, Self-Reporting, and Social Sharing for Pervasive Healthcare.

Authors:  Andreas K Triantafyllidis; Carmelo Velardo; Dario Salvi; Syed Ahmar Shah; Vassilis G Koutkias; Lionel Tarassenko
Journal:  IEEE J Biomed Health Inform       Date:  2015-09-29       Impact factor: 5.772

2.  What the ANPRM missed: additional needs for IRB reform.

Authors:  Charles W Lidz; Suzanne Garverich
Journal:  J Law Med Ethics       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 1.718

3.  Ethical and regulatory challenges of research using pervasive sensing and other emerging technologies: IRB perspectives.

Authors:  Camille Nebeker; John Harlow; Rebeca Espinoza Giacinto; Rubi Orozco-Linares; Cinnamon S Bloss; Nadir Weibel
Journal:  AJOB Empir Bioeth       Date:  2017 Oct-Dec

4.  Ethics Regulation in Social Computing Research: Examining the Role of Institutional Review Boards.

Authors:  Jessica Vitak; Nicholas Proferes; Katie Shilton; Zahra Ashktorab
Journal:  J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics       Date:  2017-08-23       Impact factor: 1.742

5.  Using the SenseCam to improve classifications of sedentary behavior in free-living settings.

Authors:  Jacqueline Kerr; Simon J Marshall; Suneeta Godbole; Jacqueline Chen; Amanda Legge; Aiden R Doherty; Paul Kelly; Melody Oliver; Hannah M Badland; Charlie Foster
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 5.043

6.  Dermatologist-level classification of skin cancer with deep neural networks.

Authors:  Andre Esteva; Brett Kuprel; Roberto A Novoa; Justin Ko; Susan M Swetter; Helen M Blau; Sebastian Thrun
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2017-01-25       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  Health Research with Big Data: Time for Systemic Oversight.

Authors:  Effy Vayena; Alessandro Blasimme
Journal:  J Law Med Ethics       Date:  2018-03-27       Impact factor: 1.718

8.  Accuracy of the Microsoft Kinect sensor for measuring movement in people with Parkinson's disease.

Authors:  Brook Galna; Gillian Barry; Dan Jackson; Dadirayi Mhiripiri; Patrick Olivier; Lynn Rochester
Journal:  Gait Posture       Date:  2014-01-22       Impact factor: 2.840

9.  Reimagining Human Research Protections for 21st Century Science.

Authors:  Cinnamon Bloss; Camille Nebeker; Matthew Bietz; Deborah Bae; Barbara Bigby; Mary Devereaux; James Fowler; Ann Waldo; Nadir Weibel; Kevin Patrick; Scott Klemmer; Lori Melichar
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2016-12-22       Impact factor: 5.428

10.  Acceptance of Mobile Health in Communities Underrepresented in Biomedical Research: Barriers and Ethical Considerations for Scientists.

Authors:  Camille Nebeker; Kate Murray; Christina Holub; Jessica Haughton; Elva M Arredondo
Journal:  JMIR Mhealth Uhealth       Date:  2017-06-28       Impact factor: 4.773

View more
  4 in total

1.  "Data is the new oil": citizen science and informed consent in an era of researchers handling of an economically valuable resource.

Authors:  Etain Quigley; Ingrid Holme; David M Doyle; Aileen K Ho; Eamonn Ambrose; Katie Kirkwood; Gerardine Doyle
Journal:  Life Sci Soc Policy       Date:  2021-12-10

2.  Precision Health: The Role of the Social and Behavioral Sciences in Advancing the Vision.

Authors:  Eric Hekler; Jasmin A Tiro; Christine M Hunter; Camille Nebeker
Journal:  Ann Behav Med       Date:  2020-11-01

3.  Ethics review of big data research: What should stay and what should be reformed?

Authors:  Agata Ferretti; Marcello Ienca; Mark Sheehan; Alessandro Blasimme; Edward S Dove; Bobbie Farsides; Phoebe Friesen; Jeff Kahn; Walter Karlen; Peter Kleist; S Matthew Liao; Camille Nebeker; Gabrielle Samuel; Mahsa Shabani; Minerva Rivas Velarde; Effy Vayena
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2021-04-30       Impact factor: 2.652

4.  Lessons Learned: Beta-Testing the Digital Health Checklist for Researchers Prompts a Call to Action by Behavioral Scientists.

Authors:  Rebecca Bartlett Ellis; Julie Wright; Lisa Soederberg Miller; Danielle Jake-Schoffman; Eric B Hekler; Carly M Goldstein; Danielle Arigo; Camille Nebeker
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2021-12-22       Impact factor: 5.428

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.