| Literature DB >> 30723842 |
Sandeep Dhall1, Turhan Coksaygan2, Tyler Hoffman1, Matthew Moorman1, Anne Lerch1, Jin-Qiang Kuang1, Malathi Sathyamoorthy1, Alla Danilkovitch1.
Abstract
Post-operative adhesions, a common complication of surgery, cause pain, impair organ functionality, and often require additional surgical interventions. Control of inflammation, protection of injured tissue, and rapid tissue repair are critical for adhesion prevention. Adhesion barriers are biomaterials used to prevent adhesions by physical separation of opposing injured tissues. Current adhesion barriers have poor anti-inflammatory and tissue regenerative properties. Umbilical cord tissue (UT), a part of the placenta, is inherently soft, conforming, biocompatible, and biodegradable, with antimicrobial, anti-inflammatory, and antifibrotic properties, making it an attractive alternative to currently available adhesion barriers. While use of fresh tissue is preferable, availability and short storage time limit its clinical use. A viable cryopreserved UT (vCUT) "point of care" allograft has recently become available. vCUT retains the extracellular matrix, growth factors, and native viable cells with the added advantage of a long shelf life at -80 °C. In this study, vCUT's anti-adhesion property was evaluated in a rabbit abdominal adhesion model. The cecum was abraded on two opposing sides, and vCUT was sutured to the abdominal wall on the treatment side; whereas the contralateral side of the abdomen served as an internal untreated control. Gross and histological evaluation was performed at 7, 28, and 67 days post-surgery. No adhesions were detectable on the vCUT treated side at all time points. Histological scores for adhesion, inflammation, and fibrosis were lower on the vCUT treated side as compared to the control side. In conclusion, the data supports the use of vCUT as an adhesion barrier in surgical procedures.Entities:
Keywords: ANGPT1, angiopoietin-1; ANGPT2, angiopoietin-2; ASTM, American Society for Testing and Materials; Adhesiolysis; Ang, angiogenin; C, Celsius; CD, cluster of differentiation; CO2, carbon dioxide; Cryopreserved; DAB, 3,3′-Diaminobenzidine; DMEM, Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium; DMSO, dimethyl sulfoxide; DPBS, Dulbecco’s phosphate-buffered saline; ECM, extracellular matrix; EGF, epidermal growth factor; EtHd-1, ethidium homodimer-1; FBS, fetal bovine serum; FDA, United States Food & Drug Administration; Fibrosis; H&E, hematoxylin and eosin; HGF, hepatocyte growth factor; HRP, horseradish peroxidase; IGFBP-1, insulin-like growth factor binding protein-1; IL-10, interleukin 10; IL-1RA, interleukin-1 receptor antagonist; IV, intravenous; IgG, immunoglobulin; Inflammation; MT, Masson’s trichrome; PBS, phosphate-buffered saline; PDGF-AA, platelet-derived growth factor AA; PDGF-BB, platelet-derived growth factor BB; PLGA, poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid); PLGF, placental growth factor; Placental; Post-surgical; SD, standard deviation; SDF-1α, stromal cell-derived factor 1 alpha; TIMP-1, tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinases-1; UT, umbilical cord tissue; VEGF-D, vascular endothelial growth factor-D; bFGF, basic fibroblast growth factor; cAM, calcein acetoxymethyl; cm, centimeter; iNOS, inducible nitric oxide synthase; mg/kg, milligram/kilogram; mm, millimeter; rpm, revolutions per minute; vCUT, viable cryopreserved umbilical tissue
Year: 2018 PMID: 30723842 PMCID: PMC6351431 DOI: 10.1016/j.bioactmat.2018.09.002
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Bioact Mater ISSN: 2452-199X
Fig. 1vCUT characterization. (A) Visual appearance of vCUT post-thaw. Asterisks show the thinner grooves in the tissue after removal of umbilical blood vessels. (B) Biomechanical properties of the vCUT. (C) Hematoxylin and Eosin (H&E, top panel) staining and staining with hyaluronan binding protein (HABP)-horseradish peroxidase (HRP) conjugate (bottom panel) of fresh umbilical tissue (UT) (left images) and vCUT (right images). (D) Presence of angiogenin (ANG), angiopoietin-1 (ANGPT1), angiopoietin-2 (ANGPT2), vascular endothelial growth factor A (VEGF-A), vascular endothelial growth factor D (VEGF-D), stromal cell derived factor-1α (SDF-1α), epidermal growth factor (EGF), hepatocyte growth factor (HGF), basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF), platelet derived growth factor AA (PDGF-AA), platelet derived growth factor BB (PDGF-BB), placenta growth factor (PIGF), interleukin 10 (IL-10) and tissue inhibitor of matrix metalloproteinases-1 (TIMP-1) in vCUT. Levels of growth factors are shown in % (mean ± SD) relatively to the levels of corresponding growth factors in fresh UT for 6 donors. (E) Cell-viability assessment by staining of fresh UT (top left image) and vCUT post-thaw (top right image) with calcein AM (green-stained viable cells) and ethidium homodimer-1 (red-stained dead cells). Representative images for 1 out of 3 tested donors (bottom panel) show cell outgrowth after placing fresh UT (bottom left image) or vCUT (bottom right image) in culture medium for 10 days.
Study design.
| Experimental Group | Time points & number of animals | Treatment type applied to each injury site | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Day 7 | Day 28 | Day 67 | ||
| 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | Control/Control |
| 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | vCUT/vCUT |
| 3 | 2 | 2 | 2 | vCUT/Control |
Each animal had two injury sites.
Fig. 2Rabbit sidewall defect-cecum abrasion model. Study design is described in Table 1, and a schematic representation of the surgical procedure is shown to the left of A-C. Each animal had two injury sites. Photographs 2A-C show key steps of the surgical procedure: (A) Cecum was abraded for 15 min on one side, resulting in profuse bleeding. The surface of the cecum facing the rest of the bowel was also abraded for 5 min. (B) Abdominal wall was abraded by removal of a portion of the abdominal wall muscle layer from the abdominal cavity to induce bleeding and inflammation. (C) vCUT was sutured to the injured abdominal wall. No vCUT was used at the control sites. Abdomen was closed.
Fig. 3Gross and histological evaluation of peritoneal adhesions at day 7 post-surgery. (A) Abraded abdominal wall directly opposed to the cecum showed early adhesion formation at control sites. Adhesions involved multiple bowel segments. (B) In the presence of vCUT, there were detectable adhesions. Localized bleeding was observed at the site as a result of surgical intervention. (C, D) H&E-stained tissue sections of control (C) and vCUT-treated injury (D) sites. Arrows show an adhesion band at the control site. (E, F) Masson's trichrome–staining shows the presence of fibrous tissue between the cecum and abdominal wall in control sites (E) and no fibrosis present at vCUT-treated sites (F). AD, adhesion; AW, abdominal wall; B, blood; C, cecum; S, suture; vCUT, cryopreserved placental tissue.
Fig. 4Gross and histological evaluation of peritoneal adhesions at day 28 post-surgery. (A) Multiple sections of the cecum have tight adhesions to the abdominal wall. (B) In the presence of vCUT, adhesions were not detected. No signs of bleeding at both control and vCUT-treated injury sites. Partially resorbed vCUT was detected at the injury site. (C, D) H&E-stained tissue sections of control (C) and vCUT-treated injury (D) sites. Arrows show an adhesion band at the control site. (E, F) Masson's trichrome–staining shows the presence of fibrous tissue between the cecum and abdominal wall at the control site (E), and no fibrosis observed at the vCUT-treated site (F). AD, adhesion; AW, abdominal wall; C, cecum; S, suture; vCUT, cryopreserved placental tissue. Peritoneal adhesion scoring is summarized in Table 2.
Fig. 5Gross and histological evaluation of peritoneal adhesions at day 67 post-surgery. (A) Sections of the cecum have tight adhesions to the abdominal wall at the control site. (B) In the presence of vCUT, adhesions were not detected. Most of vCUT was resorbed with only vCUT residuals visible on the abdominal wall. (C, D) H&E-stained tissue sections of control (C) and vCUT-treated injury (D) sites. Arrows show an adhesion band at the control site. (E, F) Masson's trichrome–staining shows the presence of fibrous tissue between the cecum and abdominal wall in control sites. (E) No inflammation and fibrosis were observed at the vCUT treated site (F). AD, adhesion; AW, abdominal wall; C, cecum; S, suture; vCUT, cryopreserved placental tissue.
Peritoneal adhesion scoring.
| Parameters | Score at day 28 | |
|---|---|---|
| Control | vCUT | |
| Adhesion between wall and cecum (gross evaluation) | 3 | 0 |
| Fibrosis (histological evaluation) | 3 | 2 |
| Inflammation (histological evaluation) | 3 | 3 |
Grading scale: 0 = normal; 1 = minimal; 2 = mild; 3 = moderate; 4 = severe.
Areas between abdominal wall and vCUT with no adhesion to cecum.