| Literature DB >> 30717353 |
Zeynep Alpay Savasan1,2, Ali Yilmaz3, Zafer Ugur4, Buket Aydas5, Ray O Bahado-Singh6,7, Stewart F Graham8,9.
Abstract
Cerebral palsy (CP) is one of the most common causes of motor disability in childhood, with complex and heterogeneous etiopathophysiology and clinical presentation. Understanding the metabolic processes associated with the disease may aid in the discovery of preventive measures and therapy. Tissue samples (caudate nucleus) were obtained from post-mortem CP cases (n = 9) and age- and gender-matched control subjects (n = 11). We employed a targeted metabolomics approach using both ¹H NMR and direct injection liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (DI/LC-MS/MS). We accurately identified and quantified 55 metabolites using ¹H NMR and 186 using DI/LC-MS/MS. Among the 222 detected metabolites, 27 showed significant concentration changes between CP cases and controls. Glycerophospholipids and urea were the most commonly selected metabolites used to develop predictive models capable of discriminating between CP and controls. Metabolomics enrichment analysis identified folate, propanoate, and androgen/estrogen metabolism as the top three significantly perturbed pathways. We report for the first time the metabolomic profiling of post-mortem brain tissue from patients who died from cerebral palsy. These findings could help to further investigate the complex etiopathophysiology of CP while identifying predictive, central biomarkers of CP.Entities:
Keywords: 1H NMR; cerebral palsy; metabolic pathways; metabolomics; targeted mass spectrometry
Year: 2019 PMID: 30717353 PMCID: PMC6409919 DOI: 10.3390/metabo9020027
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Metabolites ISSN: 2218-1989
Figure 1Typical (a) aliphatic and (b) aromatic region of 600 MHz 1H-NMR spectra of brain tissue extract, the metabolites are listed as follows. 1: 3-Hydroxybutyrate; 2: 4-Aminobutyrate; 3: Acetate; 4: Adenine; 5: Adenosine; 6: Alanine; 7: Anserine; 8: Ascorbate; 9: Aspartate; 10: Carnitine; 11: Carnosine; 12: Choline; 13: Creatine; 14: Creatine phosphate; 15: Creatinine; 16: DSS; 17: Ethanolamine; 18: Formate; 19: Fumarate; 20: Glucose; 21: Glutamate; 22: Glutamine; 23: Glutathione; 24: Glycine; 25: Histamine; 26: Homocitrulline; 27: Hypoxanthine; 28: Inosine; 29: Isobutyrate; 30: Isoleucine; 31: Isopropanol; 32: Lactate; 33: Leucine; 34: Lysine; 35: Methanol; 36: Methionine; 37: Myo-inositol; 38: N-Acetylaspartate; 39: Niacinamide; 40: O-Acetylcholine; 41: O-Phosphocholine; 42: Phenylalanine; 43: Propylene glycol; 44: Pyruvate; 45: sn-Glycero-3-phosphocholine; 46: Succinate; 47: Taurine; 48: Threonine; 49: Tryptophan; 50: Tyrosine; 51: Uracil; 52: Urea; 53: Valine; 54: π-Methylhistidine; 55: τ-Methylhistidine.
Statistically significant metabolite concentrations (μM; p < 0.05; q < 0.05) for CP vs control PM brain extracts. t-test values were calculated as a default and values with (W) were calculated using the Wilcoxon–Mann–Whitney test.
| HMDB | Compound ID | Mean (SD) of Control (μM) | Mean (SD) of CP (μM) | Fold Change | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HMDB00294 | Urea | 59.236 (37.499) | 184.144 (14.774) | 0.0074 (W) | 0.299 | −3.11 |
| HMDB00148 | L-Glutamic acid | 499.627 (15.680) | 6.767 (13.764) | 0.0106 (W) | 0.299 | 73.83 |
| HMDB13456 | PC(o-22:2(13Z,16Z)/22:3(10Z,13Z,16Z)) | 1.187 (0.902) | 0.335 (0.379) | 0.0125 (W) | 0.299 | 3.54 |
| HMDB08276 | PC(20:0/20:2(11Z,14Z)) | 0.265 (0.190) | 0.051 (0.110) | 0.0166 (W) | 0.299 | 5.16 |
| HMDB13450 | PC(o-22:0/22:6(4Z,7Z,10Z,13Z,16Z,19Z)) | 0.847 (0.710) | 0.231 (0.404) | 0.0166 (W) | 0.299 | 3.66 |
| HMDB00195 | Inosine | 8.082 (4.627) | 14.333 (6.338) | 0.0201 | 0.299 | −1.77 |
| HMDB13333 | 3-Hydroxy-9-hexadecenoylcarnitine | 0.061 (0.062) | 0.129 (0.076) | 0.0204 (W) | 0.299 | -2.13 |
| HMDB10379 | LysoPC(14:0) | 5.237 (1.153) | 4.151 (0.665) | 0.0224 | 0.299 | 1.26 |
| HMDB13433 | PC(o-18:1(9Z)/22:0) | 1.334 (0.714) | 0.638 (0.487) | 0.023 | 0.299 | 2.09 |
| HMDB13453 | PC(o-22:1(13Z)/22:3(10Z,13Z,16Z)) | 0.281 (0.180) | 0.133 (0.069) | 0.0248 | 0.299 | 2.12 |
| HMDB07991 | PC(16:0/22:6(4Z,7Z,10Z,13Z,16Z,19Z)) | 55.251 (4.352) | 19.532 (5.971) | 0.0249 | 0.299 | 2.83 |
| HMDB08055 | PC(18:0/22:5(4Z,7Z,10Z,13Z,16Z)) | 9.151 (6.281) | 3.871 (2.773) | 0.0249 | 0.299 | 2.36 |
| HMDB06083 | Troxerutin | 188.555 (18.953) | 432.889 (25.759) | 0.0250 (W) | 0.299 | −2.3 |
| HMDB08048 | PC(18:0/20:4(5Z,8Z,11Z,14Z)) | 114.082 (59.935) | 56.311 (43.130) | 0.0264 | 0.299 | 2.03 |
| HMDB00142 | Formic acid | 4.718 (2.078) | 7.489 (3.055) | 0.0269 | 0.299 | −1.59 |
| HMDB08057 | PC(18:0/22:6(4Z,7Z,10Z,13Z,16Z,19Z)) | 23.314 (15.829) | 11.438 (6.380) | 0.0275 (W) | 0.299 | 2.04 |
| HMDB07892 | PC(14:0/22:6(4Z,7Z,10Z,13Z,16Z,19Z)) | 0.405 (0.338) | 0.139 (0.090) | 0.028 | 0.299 | 2.91 |
| HMDB0029205 | LysoPC(26:0) | 0.227 (0.197) | 0.456 (0.235) | 0.0293 | 0.299 | −2.01 |
| HMDB07874 | PC(14:0/18:2(9Z,12Z)) | 3.462 (3.478) | 0.558 (0.715) | 0.0297 (W) | 0.299 | 6.21 |
| HMDB03334 | Symmetric dimethylarginine | 0.638 (0.399) | 1.405 (0.802) | 0.0310 (W) | 0.299 | −2.2 |
| HMDB10394 | LysoPC(20:3(8Z,11Z,14Z)) | 1.213 (0.902) | 0.492 (0.500) | 0.0310 (W) | 0.299 | 2.46 |
| HMDB08288 | PC(20:0/22:6(4Z,7Z,10Z,13Z,16Z,19Z)) | 0.367 (0.230) | 0.186 (0.100) | 0.0332 | 0.299 | 1.98 |
| HMDB11151 | PC(O-16:0/18:2(9Z,12Z)) | 10.915 (6.853) | 5.759 (2.592) | 0.0381 | 0.299 | 1.9 |
| HMDB13469 | SM(d18:0/24:1(15Z)(OH)) | 1.353 (0.764) | 2.168 (1.131) | 0.0402 (W) | 0.299 | −1.6 |
| HMDB13458 | PC(o-24:0/18:3(6Z,9Z,12Z)) | 0.909 (0.441) | 0.536 (0.290) | 0.0428 | 0.299 | 1.7 |
| HMDB08138 | PC(18:2(9Z,12Z)/18:2(9Z,12Z)) | 189.522 (12.500) | 60.640 (6.755) | 0.0465 (W) | 0.299 | 3.13 |
| HMDB13411 | PC(o-16:1(9Z)/16:1(9Z)) | 0.720 (0.496) | 0.362 (0.212) | 0.048 | 0.299 | 1.99 |
List of panels of metabolites used in different artificial intelligence methods. LR: logistic regression; SVM: support vector machine; PLS-DA: partial least square-discriminant analysis, RF: random forest; PAM: prediction analysis for microarrays; DL: deep learning.
| Models | Selected Features |
|---|---|
| LR | PC ae C44:5, Urea |
| SVM | PC ae C44:5, Urea, C9 |
| PLS-DA | PC ae C44:5, Urea, C9, PC aa C40:6, PC ae C40:1, PC ae C44:6 |
| RF | PC ae C44:5, Urea, C9, PC aa C40:6, PC ae C40:1 |
| PAM | Urea, PC ae C44:5, PC ae C44:6, C9, PC aa C40:6, PC ae C40:1 |
| DL | C9, PC ae C40:1, Urea, PC ae C44:6, PC ae C44:5 |
Results for the various predictive modeling techniques employed.
| LR | SVM | PLS-DA | RF | PAM | DL | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUC (95% CI) | 0.861 (0.688–1) | 0.925 (0.73–1) | 0.929 (0.8–1) | 0.899 (0.6–1) | 0.93 (0.8–1) | 0.937 (0.8–1) |
| Sensitivity | 0.842 | 0.778 | 0.870 | 0.889 | 0.899 | 0.833 |
| Specificity | 0.909 | 0.625 | 0.725 | 0.850 | 0.855 | 0.667 |
Figure 2Results of the metabolite pathway enrichment analysis.