Literature DB >> 30716025

From Detection of Individual Metastases to Classification of Lymph Node Status at the Patient Level: The CAMELYON17 Challenge.

Peter Bandi, Oscar Geessink, Quirine Manson, Marcory Van Dijk, Maschenka Balkenhol, Meyke Hermsen, Babak Ehteshami Bejnordi, Byungjae Lee, Kyunghyun Paeng, Aoxiao Zhong, Quanzheng Li, Farhad Ghazvinian Zanjani, Svitlana Zinger, Keisuke Fukuta, Daisuke Komura, Vlado Ovtcharov, Shenghua Cheng, Shaoqun Zeng, Jeppe Thagaard, Anders B Dahl, Huangjing Lin, Hao Chen, Ludwig Jacobsson, Martin Hedlund, Melih Cetin, Eren Halici, Hunter Jackson, Richard Chen, Fabian Both, Jorg Franke, Heidi Kusters-Vandevelde, Willem Vreuls, Peter Bult, Bram van Ginneken, Jeroen van der Laak, Geert Litjens.   

Abstract

Automated detection of cancer metastases in lymph nodes has the potential to improve the assessment of prognosis for patients. To enable fair comparison between the algorithms for this purpose, we set up the CAMELYON17 challenge in conjunction with the IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging 2017 Conference in Melbourne. Over 300 participants registered on the challenge website, of which 23 teams submitted a total of 37 algorithms before the initial deadline. Participants were provided with 899 whole-slide images (WSIs) for developing their algorithms. The developed algorithms were evaluated based on the test set encompassing 100 patients and 500 WSIs. The evaluation metric used was a quadratic weighted Cohen's kappa. We discuss the algorithmic details of the 10 best pre-conference and two post-conference submissions. All these participants used convolutional neural networks in combination with pre- and postprocessing steps. Algorithms differed mostly in neural network architecture, training strategy, and pre- and postprocessing methodology. Overall, the kappa metric ranged from 0.89 to -0.13 across all submissions. The best results were obtained with pre-trained architectures such as ResNet. Confusion matrix analysis revealed that all participants struggled with reliably identifying isolated tumor cells, the smallest type of metastasis, with detection rates below 40%. Qualitative inspection of the results of the top participants showed categories of false positives, such as nerves or contamination, which could be targeted for further optimization. Last, we show that simple combinations of the top algorithms result in higher kappa metric values than any algorithm individually, with 0.93 for the best combination.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30716025     DOI: 10.1109/TMI.2018.2867350

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging        ISSN: 0278-0062            Impact factor:   10.048


  35 in total

1.  Impact of JPEG 2000 compression on deep convolutional neural networks for metastatic cancer detection in histopathological images.

Authors:  Farhad Ghazvinian Zanjani; Svitlana Zinger; Bastian Piepers; Saeed Mahmoudpour; Peter Schelkens; Peter H N de With
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2019-04-24

2.  Utilizing Automated Breast Cancer Detection to Identify Spatial Distributions of Tumor-Infiltrating Lymphocytes in Invasive Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Han Le; Rajarsi Gupta; Le Hou; Shahira Abousamra; Danielle Fassler; Luke Torre-Healy; Richard A Moffitt; Tahsin Kurc; Dimitris Samaras; Rebecca Batiste; Tianhao Zhao; Arvind Rao; Alison L Van Dyke; Ashish Sharma; Erich Bremer; Jonas S Almeida; Joel Saltz
Journal:  Am J Pathol       Date:  2020-04-08       Impact factor: 4.307

Review 3.  Artificial Intelligence for Disease Assessment in Inflammatory Bowel Disease: How Will it Change Our Practice?

Authors:  Ryan W Stidham; Kento Takenaka
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2022-01-04       Impact factor: 22.682

Review 4.  Artificial intelligence applied to breast pathology.

Authors:  Mustafa Yousif; Paul J van Diest; Arvydas Laurinavicius; David Rimm; Jeroen van der Laak; Anant Madabhushi; Stuart Schnitt; Liron Pantanowitz
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2021-11-18       Impact factor: 4.064

5.  Deep Learning Model for Predicting the Pathological Complete Response to Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy of Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer.

Authors:  Xiaoying Lou; Niyun Zhou; Lili Feng; Zhenhui Li; Yuqi Fang; Xinjuan Fan; Yihong Ling; Hailing Liu; Xuan Zou; Jing Wang; Junzhou Huang; Jingping Yun; Jianhua Yao; Yan Huang
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-06-08       Impact factor: 5.738

Review 6.  Progress on deep learning in digital pathology of breast cancer: a narrative review.

Authors:  Jingjin Zhu; Mei Liu; Xiru Li
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2022-04

7.  Multiscale generative model using regularized skip-connections and perceptual loss for anomaly detection in toxicologic histopathology.

Authors:  Philip Zehnder; Jeffrey Feng; Reina N Fuji; Ruth Sullivan; Fangyao Hu
Journal:  J Pathol Inform       Date:  2022-05-26

8.  Deep Multi-Magnification Networks for multi-class breast cancer image segmentation.

Authors:  David Joon Ho; Dig V K Yarlagadda; Timothy M D'Alfonso; Matthew G Hanna; Anne Grabenstetter; Peter Ntiamoah; Edi Brogi; Lee K Tan; Thomas J Fuchs
Journal:  Comput Med Imaging Graph       Date:  2021-01-12       Impact factor: 4.790

Review 9.  Introduction to Digital Image Analysis in Whole-slide Imaging: A White Paper from the Digital Pathology Association.

Authors:  Famke Aeffner; Mark D Zarella; Nathan Buchbinder; Marilyn M Bui; Matthew R Goodman; Douglas J Hartman; Giovanni M Lujan; Mariam A Molani; Anil V Parwani; Kate Lillard; Oliver C Turner; Venkata N P Vemuri; Ana G Yuil-Valdes; Douglas Bowman
Journal:  J Pathol Inform       Date:  2019-03-08

Review 10.  Potential for Standardization and Automation for Pathology and Endoscopy in Inflammatory Bowel Disease.

Authors:  Sana Syed; Ryan W Stidham
Journal:  Inflamm Bowel Dis       Date:  2020-09-18       Impact factor: 7.290

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.