Literature DB >> 31037247

Impact of JPEG 2000 compression on deep convolutional neural networks for metastatic cancer detection in histopathological images.

Farhad Ghazvinian Zanjani1, Svitlana Zinger1, Bastian Piepers2, Saeed Mahmoudpour3,4, Peter Schelkens3,4, Peter H N de With1.   

Abstract

The availability of massive amounts of data in histopathological whole-slide images (WSIs) has enabled the application of deep learning models and especially convolutional neural networks (CNNs), which have shown a high potential for improvement in cancer diagnosis. However, storage and transmission of large amounts of data such as gigapixel histopathological WSIs are challenging. Exploiting lossy compression algorithms for medical images is controversial but, as long as the clinical diagnosis is not affected, is acceptable. We study the impact of JPEG 2000 compression on our proposed CNN-based algorithm, which has produced performance comparable to that of pathologists and which was ranked second place in the CAMELYON17 challenge. Detecting tumor metastases in hematoxylin and eosin-stained tissue sections of breast lymph nodes is evaluated and compared with the pathologists' diagnoses in three different experimental setups. Our experiments show that the CNN model is robust against compression ratios up to 24:1 when it is trained on uncompressed high-quality images. We demonstrate that a model trained on lower quality images-i.e., lossy compressed images-depicts a classification performance that is significantly improved for the corresponding compression ratio. Moreover, it is also observed that the model performs equally well on all higher-quality images. These properties will help to design cloud-based computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) systems, e.g., telemedicine that employ deep CNN models that are more robust to image quality variations due to compression required to address data storage and transmission constraints. However, the results presented are specific to the CAD system and application described, and further work is needed to examine whether they generalize to other systems and applications.

Entities:  

Keywords:  JPEG 2000 compression; convolutional neural networks; digital pathology; image quality; tumor detection

Year:  2019        PMID: 31037247      PMCID: PMC6479230          DOI: 10.1117/1.JMI.6.2.027501

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)        ISSN: 2329-4302


  17 in total

1.  Effect of image compression on telepathology. A randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  A Marcelo; P Fontelo; M Farolan; H Cualing
Journal:  Arch Pathol Lab Med       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 5.534

2.  Digital image analysis of membrane connectivity is a robust measure of HER2 immunostains.

Authors:  Anja Brügmann; Mikkel Eld; Giedrius Lelkaitis; Søren Nielsen; Michael Grunkin; Johan D Hansen; Niels T Foged; Mogens Vyberg
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2011-04-22       Impact factor: 4.872

3.  Lossless compression of JPEG2000 whole slide images is not required for diagnostic virtual microscopy.

Authors:  Thomas Kalinski; Ralf Zwönitzer; Florian Grabellus; Sien-Yi Sheu; Saadettin Sel; Harald Hofmann; Albert Roessner
Journal:  Am J Clin Pathol       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 2.493

4.  Using a visual discrimination model for the detection of compression artifacts in virtual pathology images.

Authors:  Jeffrey P Johnson; Elizabeth A Krupinski; Michelle Yan; Hans Roehrig; Anna R Graham; Ronald S Weinstein
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2010-09-23       Impact factor: 10.048

5.  Telemedicine for pathology.

Authors:  Ekaterine Kldiashvili
Journal:  Stud Health Technol Inform       Date:  2008

6.  Effects of image compression on automatic count of immunohistochemically stained nuclei in digital images.

Authors:  Carlos López; Marylène Lejeune; Patricia Escrivà; Ramón Bosch; Maria Teresa Salvadó; Lluis E Pons; Jordi Baucells; Xavier Cugat; Tomás Alvaro; Joaquín Jaén
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2008-08-28       Impact factor: 4.497

Review 7.  A survey on deep learning in medical image analysis.

Authors:  Geert Litjens; Thijs Kooi; Babak Ehteshami Bejnordi; Arnaud Arindra Adiyoso Setio; Francesco Ciompi; Mohsen Ghafoorian; Jeroen A W M van der Laak; Bram van Ginneken; Clara I Sánchez
Journal:  Med Image Anal       Date:  2017-07-26       Impact factor: 8.545

8.  Compressing pathology whole-slide images using a human and model observer evaluation.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Krupinski; Jeffrey P Johnson; Stacey Jaw; Anna R Graham; Ronald S Weinstein
Journal:  J Pathol Inform       Date:  2012-04-18

9.  Balancing image quality and compression factor for special stains whole slide images.

Authors:  Anurag Sharma; Pinky Bautista; Yukako Yagi
Journal:  Anal Cell Pathol (Amst)       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 2.916

10.  Influence of study design on digital pathology image quality evaluation: the need to define a clinical task.

Authors:  Ljiljana Platiša; Leen Van Brantegem; Asli Kumcu; Richard Ducatelle; Wilfried Philips
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2017-06-21
View more
  5 in total

1.  Improved 3D U-Net robustness against JPEG 2000 compression for male pelvic organ segmentation in radiotherapy.

Authors:  Karim El Khoury; Martin Fockedey; Eliott Brion; Benoît Macq
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2021-04-05

2.  Personalized risk prediction of symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage after stroke thrombolysis using a machine-learning model.

Authors:  Feng Wang; Yuanhanqing Huang; Yong Xia; Wei Zhang; Kun Fang; Xiaoyu Zhou; Xiaofei Yu; Xin Cheng; Gang Li; Xiaoping Wang; Guojun Luo; Danhong Wu; Xueyuan Liu; Bruce C V Campbell; Qiang Dong; Yuwu Zhao
Journal:  Ther Adv Neurol Disord       Date:  2020-01-31       Impact factor: 6.570

3.  How to learn with intentional mistakes: NoisyEnsembles to overcome poor tissue quality for deep learning in computational pathology.

Authors:  Robin S Mayer; Steffen Gretser; Lara E Heckmann; Paul K Ziegler; Britta Walter; Henning Reis; Katrin Bankov; Sven Becker; Jochen Triesch; Peter J Wild; Nadine Flinner
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-08-29

4.  Quantitative Assessment of the Effects of Compression on Deep Learning in Digital Pathology Image Analysis.

Authors:  Yijiang Chen; Andrew Janowczyk; Anant Madabhushi
Journal:  JCO Clin Cancer Inform       Date:  2020-03

5.  Quality control stress test for deep learning-based diagnostic model in digital pathology.

Authors:  Birgid Schömig-Markiefka; Alexey Pryalukhin; Wolfgang Hulla; Andrey Bychkov; Junya Fukuoka; Anant Madabhushi; Viktor Achter; Lech Nieroda; Reinhard Büttner; Alexander Quaas; Yuri Tolkach
Journal:  Mod Pathol       Date:  2021-06-24       Impact factor: 7.842

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.