Literature DB >> 30713414

County of Residence and Screening Practices among Latinas and Non-Latina Whites in Two Rural Communities.

Catherine Duggan1, Yamile Molina2, Elizabeth Carosso1, Genoveva Ibarra1, Beti Thompson1.   

Abstract

Objectives: Latinas are less likely than non-Latina Whites (NLW) to utilize mammographic screening and are more likely to be diagnosed with late-stage breast cancer. Here, we examine the effects of county-level factors on guideline-concordant breast-cancer screening behaviors in Latinas and NLWs. Design: Latinas (N=108) and NLW women (N=132) aged >40 years, residing in two adjacent rural, medically underserved counties in eastern Washington State, completed a baseline questionnaire on mammography utilization and demographics. Main Outcome Measures: Differences in socioeconomic variables and knowledge of screening practices were examined by ethnicity and county of residence. Predictors of having had a mammogram within the past two years were analyzed using multivariate logistic regression.
Results: Ethnicity was not associated with having a guideline-concordant mammogram; however, age (odds ratio [OR]=1.04, 95%CI:1.01-1.08); having >12 years of education (OR=2.09, 95%CI:1.16-3.79); having a regular clinic for health care (OR=2.22, 95%CI:1.05-4.70); having had a prior clinical breast exam (OR=5.07, 95%CI:1.71-15.02), and county of residence (OR=2.27, 95%CI:1.18-4.37) were all associated with having had a guideline-concordant mammogram. Conclusions: County of residence and having had a prior CBE were strong predictors of screening utilization. Community-level factors in medically underserved areas may influence screening patterns.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Breast Screening; Ethnicity; Health Disparities; Underserved Communities

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30713414      PMCID: PMC6343545          DOI: 10.18865/ed.29.1.31

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ethn Dis        ISSN: 1049-510X            Impact factor:   1.847


  22 in total

1.  Comparison of breast and cervical cancer screening utilization among rural and urban Hispanic and American Indian women in the Southwestern United States.

Authors:  Tomas Nuño; Joe K Gerald; Robin Harris; Maria Elena Martinez; Antonio Estrada; Francisco García
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2012-06-19       Impact factor: 2.506

2.  Cancer prevention behaviors and socioeconomic status among Hispanics and non-Hispanic whites in a rural population in the United States.

Authors:  Beti Thompson; Gloria D Coronado; Cam C Solomon; Dale F McClerran; Marian L Neuhouser; Ziding Feng
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 2.506

3.  Surveillance of health status in minority communities - Racial and Ethnic Approaches to Community Health Across the U.S. (REACH U.S.) Risk Factor Survey, United States, 2009.

Authors:  Youlian Liao; David Bang; Shannon Cosgrove; Rick Dulin; Zachery Harris; April Taylor; Shannon White; Graydon Yatabe; Leandris Liburd; Wayne Giles
Journal:  MMWR Surveill Summ       Date:  2011-05-20

4.  Reason for late-stage breast cancer: absence of screening or detection, or breakdown in follow-up?

Authors:  Stephen H Taplin; Laura Ichikawa; Marianne Ulcickas Yood; M Michele Manos; Ann M Geiger; Sheila Weinmann; Joyce Gilbert; Judy Mouchawar; Wendy A Leyden; Robin Altaras; Robert K Beverly; Deborah Casso; Emily Oakes Westbrook; Kimberly Bischoff; Jane G Zapka; William E Barlow
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2004-10-20       Impact factor: 13.506

5.  Breast cancer screening among adult women--Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, United States, 2010.

Authors:  Jacqueline W Miller; Jessica B King; Djenaba A Joseph; Lisa C Richardson
Journal:  MMWR Suppl       Date:  2012-06-15

6.  Does utilization of screening mammography explain racial and ethnic differences in breast cancer?

Authors:  Rebecca Smith-Bindman; Diana L Miglioretti; Nicole Lurie; Linn Abraham; Rachel Ballard Barbash; Jodi Strzelczyk; Mark Dignan; William E Barlow; Cherry M Beasley; Karla Kerlikowske
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2006-04-18       Impact factor: 25.391

7.  The influence of race, ethnicity, and individual socioeconomic factors on breast cancer stage at diagnosis.

Authors:  Paula M Lantz; Mahasin Mujahid; Kendra Schwartz; Nancy K Janz; Angela Fagerlin; Barbara Salem; Lihua Liu; Dennis Deapen; Steven J Katz
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2006-10-31       Impact factor: 9.308

Review 8.  Screening for breast cancer: an update for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force.

Authors:  Heidi D Nelson; Kari Tyne; Arpana Naik; Christina Bougatsos; Benjamin K Chan; Linda Humphrey
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2009-11-17       Impact factor: 25.391

9.  Socioeconomic risk factors for breast cancer: distinguishing individual- and community-level effects.

Authors:  Stephanie A Robert; Indiana Strombom; Amy Trentham-Dietz; John M Hampton; Jane A McElroy; Polly A Newcomb; Patrick L Remington
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 4.822

10.  Insurance status and stage of cancer at diagnosis among women with breast cancer.

Authors:  Michael T Halpern; John Bian; Elizabeth M Ward; Nicole M Schrag; Amy Y Chen
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2007-07-15       Impact factor: 6.860

View more
  3 in total

1.  Cancer Prevention and Diagnosis Knowledge among Spanish-speaking Older Latino/as Residing in Tampa, Florida.

Authors:  Iraida V Carrion; Malinee Neelamegam; Tania Estapé; Tracy Doering; Olivia Snyder; Ebony Tollinchi; Jorge Estapé
Journal:  Ethn Dis       Date:  2022-07-21       Impact factor: 2.006

Review 2.  The Intersection of Rural Residence and Minority Race/Ethnicity in Cancer Disparities in the United States.

Authors:  Whitney E Zahnd; Cathryn Murphy; Marie Knoll; Gabriel A Benavidez; Kelsey R Day; Radhika Ranganathan; Parthenia Luke; Anja Zgodic; Kewei Shi; Melinda A Merrell; Elizabeth L Crouch; Heather M Brandt; Jan M Eberth
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-02-03       Impact factor: 3.390

3.  Factor Analysis of the Prediction of the Postpartum Depression Screening Scale.

Authors:  Mei Cai; Yiming Wang; Qian Luo; Guo Wei
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2019-12-10       Impact factor: 3.390

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.