Literature DB >> 3070764

The Nottingham Health Profile: an analysis of its sensitivity in differentiating illness groups.

C Jenkinson1, R Fitzpatrick, M Argyle.   

Abstract

A recent criticism of the Nottingham Health Profile (NHP) claimed it was an insensitive instrument for use in population surveys, because its modal response was zero, and domains measured by the instrument are insufficiently distinct. It is argued here that the NHP was designed specifically to uncover the chronically ill in populations and, further, research undertaken here indicates that the instrument is sufficiently sensitive to be successful in permitting variations within and between illness groups to be determined. However, the domains of mobility and pain, as measured by the instrument, are found to be confounded.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3070764     DOI: 10.1016/0277-9536(88)90207-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Soc Sci Med        ISSN: 0277-9536            Impact factor:   4.634


  19 in total

Review 1.  A comparative review of generic quality-of-life instruments.

Authors:  S J Coons; S Rao; D L Keininger; R D Hays
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 4.981

2.  Health related quality of life in Parkinson's disease: a prospective longitudinal study.

Authors:  K H Karlsen; E Tandberg; D Arsland; J P Larsen
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 10.154

3.  The incidence and consequences of mental disturbances in elderly patients post cardiac surgery--a comparison with younger patients.

Authors:  J A Heijmeriks; W Dassen; K Prenger; H J Wellens
Journal:  Clin Cardiol       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 2.882

Review 4.  A review of the progress towards developing health-related quality-of-life instruments for international clinical studies and outcomes research.

Authors:  R T Anderson; N K Aaronson; M Bullinger; W L McBee
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 4.981

5.  Health of a team competing in the 1990 World Solar Car Challenge.

Authors:  R G Moorhead; C Laurence
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 5.344

6.  A comparison of two multidimensional measures of health status: the Nottingham Health Profile and the RAND 36-Item Health Survey 1.0.

Authors:  K I VanderZee; R Sanderman; J Heyink
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 4.147

7.  Influence of clinical and demographic variables on quality of life in patients with Parkinson's disease.

Authors:  K H Karlsen; J P Larsen; E Tandberg; J G Maeland
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 10.154

Review 8.  A review of the health-related quality of life and economic impact of Parkinson's disease.

Authors:  Clare H Dowding; Claire L Shenton; Sam S Salek
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 3.923

Review 9.  Review of quality-of-life evaluations in patients with angina pectoris.

Authors:  A Gandjour; K W Lauterbach
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 4.981

10.  Individual-patient monitoring in clinical practice: are available health status surveys adequate?

Authors:  C A McHorney; A R Tarlov
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  1995-08       Impact factor: 4.147

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.