Literature DB >> 30706256

Closure of foramen ovale triggered by injury to tunnel surfaces of septum primum and secundum.

Luigi Di Biase1,2, J David Burkhardt1, Rodney Horton1, Javier Sanchez1, Prasant Mohanty1, Sanghamitra Mohanty1, Shane Bailey1, G Joseph Gallinghouse1, Andrea Natale1, Subramaniam C Krishnan3.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: We investigated the feasibility to proactively stimulate subsequent closure of a patent foramen ovale (PFO) by injuring (mechanical trauma or radiofrequency [RF] energy) the opposing surfaces of the septum primum (SP) and septum secundum (SS).
METHODS: 1. Mechanical Injury: The interatrial septum of patients who underwent multiple left atrial (LA) ablations over 6 years, where a PFO was used for LA access, were examined. Patients whose PFO was absent during a later procedure were identified. Eleven patients with LA accessed via a PFO also underwent subsequent LA procedures. 2. Ablation: Ten patients undergoing ablation for drug-resistant atrial fibrillation (AF), who also had a PFO, were studied. RF delivery was extended along the upper SP. Transthoracic echocardiogram (TTE) bubble study was repeated after 3 months.
RESULTS: 1. Mechanical Injury: Seven were male with a mean age of 58.3 ± 9.99. LA size was 42.73 ± 3.52 mm. The mean left ventricular ejection fraction (EF) was 62 ± 7.4%. During the repeat procedure, in 4 patients, the PFO could not be visualized and the fossa ovalis (FO) was punctured. The fourth patient had three procedures. During the second procedure the PFO was accessed, but with difficulty. During the third procedure, it was no longer present. All four patients had subsequent TTE showing no PFO. 2. Ablation: Seven were male with a mean age of 61.1 ± 9.8 years. The mean EF and LA diameters were 55 ± 5% and 4.4 ± 0.8 cm respectively. The mean RF time was 5.4 ± 2.2 min. At 3 months, 9 patients out of 10 showed no interatrial communication.
CONCLUSION: Injury of tunnel surfaces of the SP and SS by mechanical trauma or ablation can fuse the foramen ovale.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Adhesions; Fusion; Injury; Patent foramen ovale

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30706256     DOI: 10.1007/s10840-019-00510-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol        ISSN: 1383-875X            Impact factor:   1.900


  21 in total

1.  Transthoracic echocardiography using second harmonic imaging with Valsalva manoeuvre for the detection of right to left shunts.

Authors:  N R A Clarke; J Timperley; A D Kelion; A P Banning
Journal:  Eur J Echocardiogr       Date:  2004-06

Review 2.  When and how to diagnose patent foramen ovale.

Authors:  F J Pinto
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 5.994

3.  Patent foramen ovale with paradoxical embolism: mid-term results of transcatheter closure in 256 patients.

Authors:  Eustaquio Onorato; Gloria Melzi; Francesco Casilli; Luigi Pedon; Gianluca Rigatelli; Antonio Carrozza; Pietro Maiolino; Mario Zanchetta; Eva Morandi; Silvia Angeli; Gian Paolo Anzola
Journal:  J Interv Cardiol       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 2.279

4.  Lower incidence of thrombus formation with cryoenergy versus radiofrequency catheter ablation.

Authors:  Paul Khairy; Patrick Chauvet; John Lehmann; Jean Lambert; Laurent Macle; Jean-François Tanguay; Martin G Sirois; Domenic Santoianni; Marc Dubuc
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2003-03-31       Impact factor: 29.690

Review 5.  Transcatheter closure versus medical therapy of patent foramen ovale and presumed paradoxical thromboemboli: a systematic review.

Authors:  Paul Khairy; Clare P O'Donnell; Michael J Landzberg
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2003-11-04       Impact factor: 25.391

Review 6.  Incidence and clinical course of thrombus formation on atrial septal defect and patient foramen ovale closure devices in 1,000 consecutive patients.

Authors:  Ulrike Krumsdorf; Stefan Ostermayer; Kai Billinger; Thomas Trepels; Elisabeth Zadan; Kathrin Horvath; Horst Sievert
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2004-01-21       Impact factor: 24.094

7.  Transcatheter closure of patent foramen ovale without an implant: initial clinical experience.

Authors:  Horst Sievert; Evelyn Fischer; Corinna Heinisch; Nico Majunke; Albrecht Roemer; Nina Wunderlich
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2007-09-24       Impact factor: 29.690

8.  Patent foramen ovale closure by radiofrequency thermal coaptation: first experience in the porcine model and healing mechanisms over time.

Authors:  Hidehiko Hara; Thomas K Jones; Elena R Ladich; Renu Virmani; David C Auth; Joseph E Eichinger; Robert J Sommer; Robert A Van Tassel; Robert S Schwartz
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2007-07-30       Impact factor: 29.690

9.  Transcatheter closure of patent foramen ovale in patients with cerebral ischemia.

Authors:  Martin U Braun; Dieter Fassbender; Steffen P Schoen; Markus Haass; Rainer Schraeder; Werner Scholtz; Ruth H Strasser
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2002-06-19       Impact factor: 24.094

Review 10.  Patent foramen ovale, systemic embolization and closure.

Authors:  David R Holmes; Howard Cohen; William E Katz; Guy S Reeder
Journal:  Curr Probl Cardiol       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 5.200

View more
  1 in total

1.  Stimulating a natural process for PFO closure.

Authors:  Thorsten Lewalter
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2019-04-27       Impact factor: 1.900

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.