Literature DB >> 12664817

Patent foramen ovale with paradoxical embolism: mid-term results of transcatheter closure in 256 patients.

Eustaquio Onorato1, Gloria Melzi, Francesco Casilli, Luigi Pedon, Gianluca Rigatelli, Antonio Carrozza, Pietro Maiolino, Mario Zanchetta, Eva Morandi, Silvia Angeli, Gian Paolo Anzola.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to assess the safety and feasibility of percutaneous interventional closure of patent foramen ovale (PFO) with or without atrial septal aneurysm (ASA) in symptomatic patients. Between June 1999 and June 2002, we performed transcatheter closure of PFO in 256 consecutive symptomatic patients (female/male = 1.45; mean age 48 +/- 16 years; range 14-75): ischemic stroke (n = 101), transient ischemic attack (n = 144), peripheral and coronary arterial embolism (n = 17); multiple events (n = 23); platypnea-orthodeoxia syndrome (n = 2); refractory hypoxemia (n = 1); and migraine aura (n = 27). The implanted devices were an Amplatzer PFO Occluder (n = 248), a Gore-HELEX Septal Occluder (n = 4), and PFO STAR (n = 4). Most procedures (n = 176.69%) were done under two-dimensional intracardiac echocardiography (ICE) guidance alone; in the last 30 patients, 3D/4D ICE reconstruction (TomTec Imaging Systems) 6mbH was obtained. In 30 cases, ICE and contrast enhanced-TCD have been used simultaneously in the catheterization laboratory. The devices were placed correctly in all patients. Mean fluoroscopy time was 9.45 +/- 5 minutes (range = 2.5-35 minutes); mean procedural time was 57 +/- 21 minutes (range = 15-135 minutes). Total occlusion rate at follow-up (mean 19 months, range 1-33) was 98.1%. No significant recurrent neurological events were observed. Transcatheter closure of PFO with or without ASA is a safe and effective, minimally invasive procedure that ensures high closure rate and avoids life-long anticoagulation. Mid-term follow-up results appear favorable with respect to recurrent thromboembolic events.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12664817     DOI: 10.1046/j.1540-8183.2003.08002.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Interv Cardiol        ISSN: 0896-4327            Impact factor:   2.279


  12 in total

Review 1.  Patent foramen ovale: anatomy, outcomes, and closure.

Authors:  Patrick A Calvert; Bushra S Rana; Anna C Kydd; Leonard M Shapiro
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2011-02-01       Impact factor: 32.419

2.  Patent foramen ovale: the never-ending story.

Authors:  Gérald Devuyst; Julien Bogousslavsky
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2005-07

3.  Intermediate and long-term results of transcatheter closure of patent foramen ovale using the amplatzer patent foramen ovale occluder: one case of pulmonary embolism irrespective of patent foramen ovale closure.

Authors:  Ju Hee Yoon; Joon Sik Kim; Dae Hyung Lee; Eun Jung Shim; So Yeon Lee; Ki Sik Min; Do Jun Cho; Hye Ran Lee
Journal:  Korean Circ J       Date:  2011-07-30       Impact factor: 3.243

Review 4.  Patent foramen ovale closure and medical treatments for secondary stroke prevention: a systematic review of observational and randomized evidence.

Authors:  Georgios D Kitsios; Issa J Dahabreh; Abd Moain Abu Dabrh; David E Thaler; David M Kent
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2011-12-15       Impact factor: 7.914

5.  Platypnea-Orthodeoxia Syndrome Caused by an Intracardiac Shunt.

Authors:  Sanket P Borgaonkar; Wilson W Lam; Mehdi Razavi; Dhaval R Parekh
Journal:  Tex Heart Inst J       Date:  2020-08-01

6.  Closure of foramen ovale triggered by injury to tunnel surfaces of septum primum and secundum.

Authors:  Luigi Di Biase; J David Burkhardt; Rodney Horton; Javier Sanchez; Prasant Mohanty; Sanghamitra Mohanty; Shane Bailey; G Joseph Gallinghouse; Andrea Natale; Subramaniam C Krishnan
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2019-01-31       Impact factor: 1.900

Review 7.  Current and future concepts in stroke prevention.

Authors:  Fintan O'Rourke; Naeem Dean; Naveed Akhtar; Ashfaq Shuaib
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2004-03-30       Impact factor: 8.262

Review 8.  Patent foramen ovale closure. Pro and cons.

Authors:  Eustaquio Onorato; Francesco Casilli; Marco Berti; Gian Paolo Anzola
Journal:  Neurol Sci       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 3.307

9.  Investigation of association between PFO complicated by cryptogenic stroke and a common variant of the cardiac transcription factor GATA4.

Authors:  Mahdi Moradi Marjaneh; Edwin P Kirk; Maximilian G Posch; Cemil Ozcelik; Felix Berger; Roland Hetzer; Robyn Otway; Tanya L Butler; Gillian M Blue; Lyn R Griffiths; Diane Fatkin; Jeremy J Martinson; David S Winlaw; Michael P Feneley; Richard P Harvey
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-06-06       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  A case of atypical sporadic hemiplegic migraine associated with PFO and hypoplasia of vertebro-basilar system.

Authors:  Filippo Brighina; Giacomo Gurgone; Rosa Maria Gaglio; Antonio Palermo; Giuseppe Cosentino; Brigida Fierro
Journal:  J Headache Pain       Date:  2009-05-07       Impact factor: 7.277

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.