Literature DB >> 14597460

Transcatheter closure versus medical therapy of patent foramen ovale and presumed paradoxical thromboemboli: a systematic review.

Paul Khairy1, Clare P O'Donnell, Michael J Landzberg.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The optimal strategy to prevent recurrent presumed paradoxical emboli in patients with patent foramen ovale is unknown.
PURPOSE: To synthesize the current knowledge about and qualitatively assess the relative benefits of transcatheter closure versus medical therapy for patent foramen ovale. DATA SOURCES: English-language and foreign-language journals listed in the MEDLINE database from January 1985 to July 2003 were systematically searched. Secondary sources were also used. STUDY SELECTION: Secondary prevention studies of transcatheter closure or medical therapy for patent foramen ovale were required to include at least 10 patients followed for more than 1 year and to report recurrent neurologic events. DATA EXTRACTION: Data from published studies were manually extracted and summarized. DATA SYNTHESIS: Ten studies of transcatheter closure (1355 patients) and 6 studies of medical therapy (895 patients) for patent foramen ovale were included. Overall, the 1-year rate of recurrent neurologic thromboembolism with transcatheter intervention was 0% to 4.9%, and the incidence of major and minor complications was 1.5% and 7.9%, respectively. Medical management was associated with a 1-year recurrence rate of 3.8% to 12.0%. However, limitations resulting from uncontrolled data, nonstandardized definitions, vigilance of follow-up, and baseline imbalances preclude definitive conclusions about the superiority of a particular approach. General differences in study samples included older age, greater proportion of men, and higher prevalence of diabetes and smoking among medically treated patients. Patients undergoing treatment with a transcatheter device were more likely to have had multiple thromboembolic events at baseline.
CONCLUSION: Transcatheter closure of patent foramen ovale may prevent a substantial proportion of cryptogenic strokes. Randomized clinical trials are needed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14597460     DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-139-9-200311040-00010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Intern Med        ISSN: 0003-4819            Impact factor:   25.391


  56 in total

1.  Patent foramen ovale and stroke: Should PFOs be closed in otherwise cryptogenic stroke?

Authors:  David A Carpenter; Andria L Ford; Jin-Moo Lee
Journal:  Curr Atheroscler Rep       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 5.113

Review 2.  Atrial septum defect closure device in a beating heart, from the perspective of a researcher in artificial organs.

Authors:  Yasuko Tomizawa
Journal:  J Artif Organs       Date:  2012-06-23       Impact factor: 1.731

Review 3.  Closure of patent foramen ovale: is the case really closed as well?

Authors:  F A Flachskampf; W G Daniel
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 5.994

Review 4.  Closure of patent foramen ovale: technique, pitfalls, complications, and follow up.

Authors:  B Meier
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 5.994

Review 5.  [Patent foramen ovale, atrial septum aneurysm, and stroke. An examination of the status of recent evidence].

Authors:  K Kraywinkel; M Jauss; H-C Diener; C Weimar
Journal:  Nervenarzt       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 1.214

Review 6.  Is patent foramen ovale a modifiable risk factor for stroke recurrence?

Authors:  David M Kent; David E Thaler
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 7.914

7.  A case of cryptogenic stroke associated with patent foramen ovale coexisting with pulmonary embolisms, deep vein thromboses, and renal artery infarctions.

Authors:  Moon-Sik Park; Jong-Pil Park; So-Hee Yun; Jae-Un Lee; Joong-Keun Kim; Na-Eun Lee; Ji-Eun Song; Shin-Eun Lee; Sung-Hee John; Ji-Hyun Lim; Jay-Young Rhew
Journal:  Korean Circ J       Date:  2012-12-31       Impact factor: 3.243

8.  Complications and mid-term outcome after percutaneous patent foramen ovale closure in patients with cryptogenic stroke.

Authors:  J G L M Luermans; M C Post; H W M Plokker; J M Ten Berg; M J Suttorp
Journal:  Neth Heart J       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 2.380

9.  Closure of foramen ovale triggered by injury to tunnel surfaces of septum primum and secundum.

Authors:  Luigi Di Biase; J David Burkhardt; Rodney Horton; Javier Sanchez; Prasant Mohanty; Sanghamitra Mohanty; Shane Bailey; G Joseph Gallinghouse; Andrea Natale; Subramaniam C Krishnan
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2019-01-31       Impact factor: 1.900

Review 10.  Rethinking trial strategies for stroke and patent foramen ovale.

Authors:  David E Thaler; David M Kent
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurol       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 5.710

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.