Literature DB >> 30704884

Combined Anterior Cruciate and Anterolateral Ligament Reconstruction in the Professional Athlete: Clinical Outcomes From the Scientific Anterior Cruciate Ligament Network International Study Group in a Series of 70 Patients With a Minimum Follow-Up of 2 Years.

Nikolaus Rosenstiel1, Cesar Praz1, Hervé Ouanezar1, Adnan Saithna1, Yann Fournier1, Jean-Philippe Hager1, Mathieu Thaunat1, Bertrand Sonnery-Cottet2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate clinical outcomes in professional athletes after combined anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) and anterolateral ligament (ALL) reconstruction at a minimum follow-up of 2 years.
METHODS: A retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data from the Scientific Anterior Cruciate Ligament Network International (SANTI) Study Group database was performed. All professional athletes who underwent primary combined ACL and ALL reconstruction between January 2011 and March 2016 were included. Patient assessment included physical examination, pre- and postoperative subjective and objective International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC), Tegner activity scale, and Lysholm scores.
RESULTS: Seventy-two professional athletes underwent primary ACL and ALL reconstruction; 70 (97%) were available, with a mean follow-up of 3.9 years (range, 2-7). The preoperative side-to-side anteroposterior laxity difference was 7.1 ± 1.4 mm, and this decreased significantly after surgery to 0.4 ± 0.9 mm (P < .0001). Pivot-shift grade evolved from 16 grade I (22.8%) and 54 grade II or III (77.2%) preoperatively, to 66 absent pivot shift (94.3%) and 4 grade I (5.7; P < .001). By 1-year postoperatively, 60 athletes (85.7%) returned to professional sport, with a mean time interval of 7.9 months (range, 5-12). Preoperatively, the mean subjective IKDC was 56.1 ± 12.3, the Lysholm score was 48.4 ± 12.5, and the Tegner score was 9.3 ± 1. At final follow-up, the mean subjective IKDC was 90.5 ± 7.6 (P < .0001), the Lysholm score was 94.4 ± 7.5 (P < .0001), and the Tegner score was 8.8 ± 1.5 (P < .004). The objective IKDC evolved from 39 grade C (55.7%) and 31 grade D (44.3%) preoperatively to 65 grade A (92.9%) and 5 grade B (7.1%) (P < .0001). Eleven Patients (15,7%) underwent a subsequent ipsilateral reoperation including 4 (5.7%) revision ACL reconstructions. The risk of graft rupture was significantly higher in female patients (13.6% vs 2.1% in male patients; P = .048).
CONCLUSIONS: Combined ACL and ALL reconstruction is associated with excellent outcomes in professional athletes with respect to graft rupture rates, return to sport, knee stability, and reoperation rates after injury. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, case series.
Copyright © 2019 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30704884     DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2018.09.020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arthroscopy        ISSN: 0749-8063            Impact factor:   4.772


  13 in total

Review 1.  There are differences in knee stability based on lateral extra-articular augmentation technique alongside anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Eoghan T Hurley; David A Bloom; Alexander Hoberman; Utkarsh Anil; Guillem Gonzalez-Lomas; Eric J Strauss; Michael J Alaia
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2021-01-23       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 2.  Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury and the Anterolateral Complex of the Knee-Importance in Rotatory Knee Instability?

Authors:  Elan J Golan; Robert Tisherman; Kevin Byrne; Theresa Diermeier; Ravi Vaswani; Volker Musahl
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2019-12

Review 3.  Returning Athletes to Sports Following Anterior Cruciate Ligament Tears.

Authors:  Anna M Ptasinski; Mark Dunleavy; Temitope Adebayo; Robert A Gallo
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2022-07-26

4.  Return to Sports: A Risky Business? A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis of Risk Factors for Graft Rupture Following ACL Reconstruction.

Authors:  Anna Cronström; Eva Tengman; Charlotte K Häger
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2022-08-24       Impact factor: 11.928

5.  A Review of Current Concepts of the Anterolateral Complex of the Knee.

Authors:  Vasileios Athanasiou; Andreas Panagopoulos; Antonios Kouzelis; Zinon T Kokkalis; John Lakoumentas; Konstantinos Katsanos; John Gliatis
Journal:  Orthop Rev (Pavia)       Date:  2022-10-04

6.  Research on the Anterolateral Ligament of the Knee: An Evaluation of PubMed Articles From 2010 to 2019.

Authors:  Asep Santoso; Iwan Budiwan Anwar; Tangkas Sibarani; Bintang Soetjahjo; Dwikora Novembri Utomo; Edi Mustamsir; Nicolaas C Budhiparama
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2020-12-29

7.  Combined Anterior Cruciate Ligament Repair and Anterolateral Ligament Internal Brace Augmentation: Minimum 2-Year Patient-Reported Outcome Measures.

Authors:  Graeme P Hopper; Joanna M S Aithie; Joanne M Jenkins; William T Wilson; Gordon M Mackay
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2020-12-18

8.  Isokinetic Strength After ACL Reconstruction: Influence of Concomitant Anterolateral Ligament Reconstruction.

Authors:  Benoit Gillet; Yoann Blache; Isabelle Rogowski; Grégory Vigne; Olivier Capel; Bertrand Sonnery-Cottet; Jean-Marie Fayard; Mathieu Thaunat
Journal:  Sports Health       Date:  2021-04-02       Impact factor: 3.843

9.  Risk Factors for Contra-Lateral Secondary Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury: A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Anna Cronström; Eva Tengman; Charlotte K Häger
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2021-01-30       Impact factor: 11.136

10.  Satisfactory patient-reported outcomes at 5 years following primary repair with suture tape augmentation for proximal anterior cruciate ligament tears.

Authors:  Graeme P Hopper; Joanna M S Aithie; Joanne M Jenkins; William T Wilson; Gordon M Mackay
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2021-02-13       Impact factor: 4.342

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.